Image not available

1020x600

Scientific_racism....jpg

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16284789

Is scientific racism a pseudoscience?

Anonymous No. 16284831

Yes.

Anonymous No. 16284913

Yes

Anonymous No. 16285443

Yeah

Anonymous No. 16285451

Yeh.

Anonymous No. 16285455

certain races do have certain characteristics which is unavoidable because of evolution. however this is no excuse to treat your fellow human being like an animal

Anonymous No. 16285464

Black people could be selectively breed to have "white" facial features and in fact many of them in africa already have them by pure coincidence.
You'd think they were mixed if you saw them in your home country.

Anonymous No. 16285466

>>16285464
You said yes

Anonymous No. 16285473

>>16284789
>Is statistics a pseudoscience

Anonymous No. 16285485

>>16285473
>jews are better than me and deserve to rule over me

Anonymous No. 16285494

>>16285473
Indian Americans earn more than white Americans, therefore they should be in charge

Anonymous No. 16285532

>>16285494
>>16285485
Yes.

Anonymous No. 16285557

>>16284789
Yes, as long as they can interbreed, they're the same species and race rhetoric is just selected characteristics over time, usually stemming from one family, or sets of families, having more offspring than other populations in a given area.
Before you say it, dogs and wolves are the same species and can interbreed safely and continuously, humans and neanderthals, despite having interbred, were likely to have had issues interbreeding due to male hybrid infertility, so they're not the same species.

Anonymous No. 16285558

>>16285485
>>16285494
Nobody said that. But yeah sub 90IQ people have no business voting on foreign policy and taxes and the like.

Anonymous No. 16285561

>>16285557
”Species” is not rigorously defined. Many different ”species” can interbreed and have fertile offspring, so it could be argued there are different species of human.

The genetic distance between whites/asians and africans is much greater than that found between some ”species” that are classified as different.

Anonymous No. 16285573

>>16285561
The genetic difference between whites/asians is lesser than the genetic difference between Mexican people in the same country and all of them are still the same species.
That species as a definition is fuzzy still doesn't take away from the argument that racism is a pseudoscience. I mean, even if you achieved optimal racism and made everyone a monorace, what rises up next is phrenology and so on. So, really, all you're left to do is categorize people by their actions taken and not, like we do wolves and dogs, and although race can be a correlation, it isn't cause.

Anonymous No. 16285752

>>16285558
There used to be literacy tests and poll taxes required to vote, but the 1964 civil rights act abolished that

Anonymous No. 16285765

>>16285473
it is.

science does not allow guessing of any kind.

Anonymous No. 16285769

>>16285557
Will a wolf select a dog as a mate, given a choice? No probably not
Will a Galapagos ground finch select a tree finch? Again no
Will a homo sapian (white) select a homo sapian (asian)? Sure, or black and brown, or white and white.

Anonymous No. 16285776

>>16285573
Uh yes your genes are literally the cause of your behaviors. Genes -> brain -> behavior in an environment.

Now what is not science is this tabula rasa ideologically motivated drivel that the French revolution thinkers shat out because they liked the sound of it.

Anonymous No. 16285779

>>16285765
Go eat crayons, retard

Anonymous No. 16285855

>>16285561
2500 years ago Hanno the navigator, a major naval figure from Carthage, set sail on one of the great voyages of discovery. He sailed from the Mediterranean out of the straights of Gibraltar to explore the coast of Africa with a fleet of 60 ships, he worked his way down the coast past Mauritania to subsaharan Africa where he found his surprise that the people there all had "burnt skin" as he described it, which is to say they were negroes. After meeting people like this for a while every time his ships made landfall, Hanno eventually came to an island off the coast of what is now Cameroon that was filled with burnt skin people who were very hairy and extremely unruly. He named this tribe "Gorillas".
Because Hanno was not influenced by our modern ideas of species he had to call things as he saw them and he was unable to differentiate between gorillas and African negroes other than that the gorillas were hairier.

Anonymous No. 16285869

>>16284789
No.
That picture is not scientific thoughever.

Anonymous No. 16285903

>>16284789
Nah people adapted to different conditions on the earth. It becomes controversial once you get into business since some adaptations are more profitable than others. Then you get into the domestication of the population for various things or resistance against that domestication.

Anonymous No. 16285957

>>16285903
It's not just business, it's life and death, the difference between success and failure.

Anonymous No. 16285977

>>16285557
Interracial/ethnic marriage and adverse birth outcomes
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0277953620307796

>Race/ethnicity is associated with adverse birth outcomes in the United States. However, mostly mother's race/ethnicity has been considered. We examined the associations of mother's and parents' race/ethnicity with low birth weight, small for gestational age, preterm birth and infant mortality among New York City women between 2012 and 2017.

Highlights
•Parents' race/ethnicity were associated with adverse birth outcomes
•Parents' race/ethnicity-outcome associations were outcome- and pairing-specific.
•Neighborhood racial/ethnic composition was associated with adverse birth outcomes.

Anonymous No. 16285997

Africa should become a multi cultural continent.
Africa is suffering from too much homogenousness. Every African city should have a little Paris in it. European farmers in Africa should be given special protections and grants all across Africa. Africans are really suffering from ethnocentrism. Our Western leaders should peacefully help them become more aware and accepting of other cultures.

Anonymous No. 16287850

>>16285977
>non-hispanic
>non-hispanic
>correlation
>correlation
>nothing fertility of birth outcomes
anon, if you're gonna grasp for straws, get a good one.

Anonymous No. 16287886

genetics are real and the races evolved different traits to suit different environments, yes.

Anonymous No. 16287889

>>16285557
That's a highschool level understanding of species. All bears can interbreed, as well as many other types of mammals, and also many birds and fish. Yet they are all still considered different species.

Image not available

1062x903

IMG_5343.png

Anonymous No. 16287939

>>16284789
Anon


There’s no such thing as “scientific racism “ just science , science is neither good nor bad

Image not available

1080x1268

IMG_5408.jpg

Anonymous No. 16287940

>>16285557
You were saying ?

Image not available

273x245

IMG_5086.jpg

Anonymous No. 16287941

>>16285765
This isn’t the board for you buddy , go back to your dumpster fire of a website plebbit and worship worship nihilism and hedonism away from us

Anonymous No. 16287960

>>16287940
What is the criteria for humans differentiating into different subspecies?

Anonymous No. 16287983

>>16287960
Differences in facial and skull structure , skin tone , along with this if members of two groups of subspecies of human have a child and it has health complications after being born (not being able to get transplants for organs or bone marrow and having a extremely difficult time finding a suitable blood donater that means the two groups are separate subspecies of homo sapien and are genetically incompatible,

Anonymous No. 16287999

>>16284789
Who can tell, when it's considered bad form to even do the research? "Not the done thing, y'know?"

Anonymous No. 16288129

>>16284789
Yes

Anonymous No. 16288251

>>16284789
What do you mean by race? Because the definition that the bad faith propagandists use is intentionally designed to be unreasonable and incomprehensible so that the "truth-representing counterarguments" can easily dismantle and delegitimize this straw men-propelled concept in front of an audience of impressionable young people.

Anonymous No. 16288258

>>16287940
>Sumatran tiger and sumatran orangutan not lined up
Anon...

Anonymous No. 16288293

>>16285573
>The genetic difference between whites/asians is lesser than the genetic difference between Mexican people in the same country
Bro doesn't understand genetic clusters baka

Image not available

5000x5000

1593532252791.png

Anonymous No. 16288297

>>16285573
I don't get why people make this retarded argument when there are clear clusters to be observed

Anonymous No. 16288338

Racism nowadays is much more nuanced because of advances in genetics and neuroscience. Scientific racism as an early 20th century movement has been debunked.

Anonymous No. 16288348

>>16285765
KEK
>>>/pol/

Anonymous No. 16288378

No, race is social construct, such as god is, you should fuck around and find out how much fucking social cuntstructs hurts.

Anonymous No. 16288381

>>16285473
>lies, damn lies, and statistics

Anonymous No. 16288387

>>16285776
You should read a little about epigenetics if you're so sure... But yeah genes play a part in human behavior but they don't explain everything

Anonymous No. 16288444

>>16288338
Debunked only in the political sense.

Anonymous No. 16288734

>scientific racism
>"scientific"
>SCIENTIFIC
>pseudoscience?
you should be a nigger to ask this question.

Anonymous No. 16288999

>>16284789
>science
>racism
It's a contradiction, not a pseudoscience.

🗑️ Anonymous No. 16289008

>>16284789
Yes, but no. Races exist, but the differences are very minimal due, there is barely any difference from the average Joe, John, JoĂŁo, Johan or whatever, except maybe in some very secluded areas. Practically speaking there is no reason why races should be someone's favorite daily topic.

Anonymous No. 16289010

>>16284789
Yes, but no. Races exist, but the differences are very minimal due to early mixing, there is barely any difference from the average Joe, John, JoĂŁo, Johan or whatever, except maybe in some very secluded areas. Practically speaking there is no reason why races should be someone's favorite daily topic.

Anonymous No. 16289027

>>16289010
>there is no reason why races should be someone's favorite daily topic
My dying wish in 80 years will be that everyone who acquiesced to race animosity as a career will have their bones dug up out of their graves and their spirits forever encapsulated in industrial saran wrap.

Anonymous No. 16289042

>>16288387
What else other than genes has a comparable influence on human behaviour?

Anonymous No. 16289049

>>16289042
Not him but e.g. drowning in water has a greater influence on human behavior than genes.

Anonymous No. 16289062

>>16289042
The environment

Anonymous No. 16289754

You're asking if evolution is pseudoscience.