Image not available

850x850

fractal_omnipepe_....jpg

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16287534

>make a new journal and become its editor in chief
>have your friend make another new journal and become its editor in chief as new
>you submit papers to your friend journal
>your friend submit papers to your journal
>always accept each other papers
>always cite each other work from the other journal
>now both journals will have high impact factor due to citations from the other ones
>now you both have high citation counts in high impact factor journals
is there a system to stop people from doing this or it's just unlimited exploit for a free "high impact" academic career?

Anonymous No. 16287537

>>16287534
Delete your garbage thread OP.

Anonymous No. 16287538

>>16287537
why is it garbage? It could help one academic career tremendously. I need to know in case I need to farm citation in the future.

Anonymous No. 16287543

>>16287534
>is there a system to stop people from doing this
yeah people who read papers don't like papers that look like that, hope this helps!

Anonymous No. 16287550

>>16287543
My papers can be of high enough quality and I can still do this to increase citation counts.

Anonymous No. 16287552

>>16287550
if your papers were of high enough quality, they would get published and cited on more popular journal hosts :^)

Anonymous No. 16287556

>>16287552
But that wouldnt be as cool as having my own high impact factor journal

Anonymous No. 16287563

>>16287556
>be you
>design scam journal
>no credit because the only other associated journal host is also a scam
>no other contributors to make you an actual journal host
>no contributors to pad out scam
>nobody considers journal legit
>go under due to irrelevancy
many such cases!

Anonymous No. 16287776

>>16287563
>nobody considers journal legit
what if I have like 5k citations? wouldn't that add crediblity. people like Yann LeCun and Geoffrey Hinton basically did the same thing with their ICLR conference and it turned into a legit top tier venue so it is possible.

Anonymous No. 16287786

>>16287776
>5k citations
>1 journal
>1 author
KEK

Anonymous No. 16287787

>>16287786
hey, I have closer and closer to 500 already. it's not farfetch that in 5-10 years I'll have 5k

Anonymous No. 16288008

>>16287534
To all the anons clowning OP, american psychology before the replication crisis became common knowledge was exactly like this. A closed group of professors reviewing each other’s work, accepting it, accepting each other’s students for research, agreeing to be examiners and whatnot. Things have changed in the decade and a half since then, but don’t think this doesn’t occur.