๐งต Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Sat, 20 Jul 2024 19:02:35 UTC No. 16289931
>https://www.newscientist.com/artic
How significant is this new progress to the proliferation of nuclear power?
Anonymous at Sat, 20 Jul 2024 19:33:18 UTC No. 16289967
All chinese reactors are meltdown-proof.
Chinese press would never have to report any.
Anonymous at Sat, 20 Jul 2024 19:43:18 UTC No. 16289974
>>16289931
>>16289967
I actually wouldn't be surprised if they were meltdown proof. Even something like fukushima they were decades old reactors and they got hit by a tsunami. All you have to do is keep water on the core.
Anonymous at Sat, 20 Jul 2024 20:15:33 UTC No. 16290018
>>16289974
actually if you really dig into the fukushima case you realise some israeli engineering company literally bolew up the reactor and shut down half of the regulatory pumps and switchgears...
Magna bsp I think it was called
Anonymous at Sun, 21 Jul 2024 11:07:01 UTC No. 16290719
Consider this, the US Navy has several hundred reactor-years of operation under their belt without a single meltdown.
Anonymous at Sun, 21 Jul 2024 14:38:35 UTC No. 16290871
>>16289931
This isn't new, at all.
Anonymous at Sun, 21 Jul 2024 15:30:01 UTC No. 16290914
This sort of reactor is not new. This demonstration is essentially a demonstration that even in the worst possible scenario imaginable, nothing will happen of even the most mild sort. It's like going from a 0.000001% risk with existing Salt Reactors to 0. Bill Gates was even in the news recently for funding a new-build salt reactor. So, I doubt it will do much.
The Thorium reactor projects in China could end up being a very different story in terms of bringing costs down and solving the supply issue if the world ever scaled up nuclear usage. I would also look to this modular reactor project out of North Carolina as well as Gate's own. Though, the project out of North Carolina is looking much less promising than it was maybe thought.
Anonymous at Mon, 22 Jul 2024 06:52:31 UTC No. 16291855
>>16289931
capitalist nuclear reactors are designed to break so the manufacturers can make more money.
Anonymous at Mon, 22 Jul 2024 08:21:47 UTC No. 16291909
>>16289931
>How significant is this new progress to the proliferation of nuclear power?
not much because the greatest hinderance is not the disaster risk, but the cost and what to with all that radioactive waste. Not even rich countries know what to do with it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hOW
Anonymous at Mon, 22 Jul 2024 19:08:58 UTC No. 16292499
>>16291909
this was/is deliberate sabotage we know since the 60s(?) how to transmute spent nuclear fuel so you cut down the lifetime from a couple thousand/million years to a couple hundreds physicists knew this shit was harmful yet the government still went ahead with this bullshit. No one wants to admit why because then they would have to admit ((who)) it was that sabotaged the German nuclear program and exactly ((who)) it is that has put a complete stop on all nuclear tech in Germany. That affects new promising fusion research as well. In fact a new reactor is being build in experimental Belgium that is going to transmute old fuel together with the french because the German gov refused to fund similar reactor back home despite us having better designs vs the french.
Nuclear waste is a non issue in a well functioning society sadly there are many people who don't like others working peacefully together if it threatens their grip on them.
Anonymous at Mon, 22 Jul 2024 19:09:59 UTC No. 16292500
>>16292499
>In fact a new reactor is being build in experimental Belgium
*new experimental reactor is being build in Belgium
Anonymous at Mon, 22 Jul 2024 19:11:38 UTC No. 16292507
>>16289931
>In other news, China now has technology America invented fifty years ago.
I'm unconvinced that China has ever invented ANYTHING on its own.
Anonymous at Mon, 22 Jul 2024 19:13:11 UTC No. 16292513
>>16291909
Just launch it into space, let the aliens deal with it.
Anonymous at Mon, 22 Jul 2024 19:40:08 UTC No. 16292552
>>16289931
What if a rocket hits it? What if that self-cooling system fails? What if that is nothing but baseless chinese propaganda?
Those are the questions you should have been able to ask yourself.
Anonymous at Mon, 22 Jul 2024 19:52:25 UTC No. 16292563
>>16291855
I hate commie faggots like you wouldn't believe.
Anonymous at Mon, 22 Jul 2024 20:06:14 UTC No. 16292586
>>16289931
I think... I think I've seen this one before.
Anonymous at Mon, 22 Jul 2024 20:29:03 UTC No. 16292633
>>16292552
There's a huge box of graphite "pebble" balls suspended over the reactor. If anything goes wrong, they fall down over the reaction chamber and everyone gets an extra hour in the graphite ball pit.