Anonymous at Mon, 22 Jul 2024 17:01:24 UTC No. 16292314

i like this pepe

Anonymous at Mon, 22 Jul 2024 17:08:02 UTC No. 16292320

>>16292313
it moves at c - 1 actually, you are the one providing the +1m/s

Anonymous at Mon, 22 Jul 2024 17:11:17 UTC No. 16292325

>>16292320
You are adding velocity to the light beam. So it's c + 1. If you are walking at 1m/s and drop a ball, its forward velocity starts at 1m/s before losing energy. It doesn't just drop straight down.

Anonymous at Mon, 22 Jul 2024 17:13:35 UTC No. 16292329

>>16292325
>You are adding velocity to the light beam
exactly, so it doesnt have to work so hard to reach the speed of light it goes c - 1

Anonymous at Mon, 22 Jul 2024 17:26:02 UTC No. 16292341

Why does it have to stop at the speed of light? It goes at c + 1 because you are adding 1 m/s of velocity to it. That's how physics works.

Anonymous at Mon, 22 Jul 2024 17:55:20 UTC No. 16292379

>>16292313
except all experimental observation and theoretical examination shows that that's not just how it works.

electrodynamics doesn't fully work in a galilean universe - it can still describe limited cases of electro- or magnetostatics and some low-velocity dynamics, but completely breaks down at higher-velocities and doesn't allow for EM wave formation.

Anonymous at Mon, 22 Jul 2024 17:58:52 UTC No. 16292382

>>16292341
For the same reason that water stops being a liquid at 100C at standard pressure.

Anonymous at Mon, 22 Jul 2024 18:25:55 UTC No. 16292422

>>16292382
The energy breaks the hydrogen bonds by exciting them causing the water molecules to flow freely.

Now explain why there is a speed limit at which light can move.

Anonymous at Mon, 22 Jul 2024 20:36:37 UTC No. 16292641

>>16292379
Yea, it’s an engineering approximation that works in some contexts. It is not a blueprint of the universe.

Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jul 2024 06:33:11 UTC No. 16293131

>>16292313
>I don't believe in special relativity
learn
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michelson%E2%80%93Morley_experiment