Anonymous at Mon, 22 Jul 2024 18:40:56 UTC No. 16292442

>>16292418
Math also predicted it, 21/7 = 3

Anonymous at Mon, 22 Jul 2024 18:46:38 UTC No. 16292453

>>16292418
You can't replicate coincidences. Once you can they are no longer coincidences and it's a science.

Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jul 2024 03:31:34 UTC No. 16293048

>>16292453
>when astrology is correct its just a coincidence, but when other branches of science are correct thats because they have predictive capability
why does the fact that astrology has predictive capability upset you so badly?

Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jul 2024 04:46:39 UTC No. 16293084

>>16293048
Programming in childhood. Retarded identity and self preservation instincts.

Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jul 2024 07:02:12 UTC No. 16293146

>>16292418
>predict
that's not a prediction, it's called being deductive and lucky.
The odds weren't that bad: not only there were a small number of days left until the DNC, and Biden had to decide before then, it was also was almost sure he would drop out very soon from all the pressure , the polls, and his mental decay, so...
Last week, I too predicted Biden would drop out within a week, and I didn't ask the stars. I didn't bother to guess specific dates like she did, but maybe I too would have gotten lucky, my odds being 1/7.

The fact is that, over many decades of scientific testing and analysis of data, astrology fails over, and over, and over again at predicting things, with sporadic lucky guesses which "believers" biasedly cherry-pick out of a huge set of failures to exemplify "predictions".
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KbJJ7bg-en0
cheers

Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jul 2024 09:16:23 UTC No. 16293226

>>16293048
It's a coincidence if it's not repeatable. If it's not repeatable, it's not science.

Let the girl in OP attempt, say, 1000 day predictions for similar events, compare with a control group of 1000 predictions done by someone who doesn't give a shit about astrology, compile results and write a paper on it.

Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jul 2024 09:51:02 UTC No. 16293242

>>16293226
>If it's not repeatable, it's not science.
how come abiogenesis is considered science

Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jul 2024 10:03:07 UTC No. 16293253

>>16293242
>abiogenesis

Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jul 2024 11:01:15 UTC No. 16293300

>>16293242
>abiogenesis
All hypothetical, which is one of the very first steps in the scientific method, right after observation. Hypotheses are tested through experiments, which are then repeated. In the case of abiogenesis, we simply lack the means of testing its validity, so we stopped at hypothesising. On the other hand, we have all the means to confirm the hypothesis that astrology is bullshit, which has been done and repeated so many times it became a commonly agreed upon theory. This is all pretty basic.

Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jul 2024 07:01:34 UTC No. 16294420

>>16293300
>which has been done and repeated so many time
no it hasn't, theres a myriad of scientific reasons that demonstrate the validity of astrology

Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jul 2024 09:51:59 UTC No. 16294503

>>16294420
>theres a myriad of scientific reasons that demonstrate the validity of astrology
see >>16293226
>Let the girl in OP attempt, say, 1000 day predictions for similar events, compare with a control group of 1000 predictions done by someone who doesn't give a shit about astrology, compile results and write a paper on it.

Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jul 2024 19:24:50 UTC No. 16295079

>>16294503
This isn't a good comparison. I would want them to be compared against somebody who is using some other personality profiling system for consulting and perhaps success of clients. Astrology theoretically stands miles above others in this regard. If it fails here, then the more nuanced points can be discarded in turn.
In case you have ever pondered why astrology is actually useful, consider that it exhaustively ties human traits, to mythical and memorable legends, that exist in spatial relationships. This means that is profiles people in an easy to remember system that can account for the most variation possible - as even angles and and distances are accounted, this allows for limitless consideration of relationships. Why is this important?
So if some celestial alignment indicates to be wary of greed, well it doesn't really matter if the rise of greed is actually a problem. If it can inform someone to think about how a greedy person might harm them, then it might help in a given circumstance.
This is the concept of ars combinatoria, where knowledge of orientation of simple elements lends to behaviors of complex systems.

Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jul 2024 19:44:13 UTC No. 16295110

Funny thing about astrology, the star signs aren't aligned anymore. They used to be, but changes in earth's rotation compounded over the years shifted the dates, and no astroretard has ever thought to check.
That's how you know it's bullshit.

Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jul 2024 04:54:27 UTC No. 16295643

>>16295110
>and no astroretard has ever thought to check
everyone in professional astronomy knows about that, snowflake, so does everyone in professional astrology

Anonymous at Fri, 26 Jul 2024 03:30:34 UTC No. 16296883

claiming that astrology isn't a real science is akin to claiming that developmental psychology isn't a real science

Anonymous at Sat, 27 Jul 2024 04:20:48 UTC No. 16298415

Astrology is just pattern recognition, its not different than any other science

Anonymous at Sun, 28 Jul 2024 02:01:06 UTC No. 16299821

>>16292418
How come medicine couldn't recognize the obvious symptoms of dementia since years ago?

Anonymous at Sun, 28 Jul 2024 02:08:49 UTC No. 16299830

>>16295643
>everyone in professional astronomy knows about that
No shit, they do real science
>so does everyone in professional astrology
You're in for a shock

Anonymous at Sun, 28 Jul 2024 22:33:38 UTC No. 16301008

>>16299830
>they do real science
no they don't, see pic
>You're in for a shock
its not shocking to learn that you have never once in your life interacted with a professional astrologer and that you have no idea what you're talking about. dishonest blowhards like yourself are extremely common

Anonymous at Sun, 28 Jul 2024 22:34:17 UTC No. 16301011

>>16301008
>look at this thing I made up
OK
>projection
OK

Anonymous at Mon, 29 Jul 2024 18:55:16 UTC No. 16302194

>>16301008
>95% of the universe is made out of imaginary unicorn energy and sasquatch matter
nothing is faker than modern astronomy

Anonymous at Wed, 31 Jul 2024 00:54:27 UTC No. 16303970

>>16302194
What about virology?

Anonymous at Wed, 31 Jul 2024 00:55:16 UTC No. 16303972

>>16292418
Astrology is unclamped, unvaxxed, and uncut.
Science is clamped, vaxxed, and circ'd.

Anonymous at Thu, 1 Aug 2024 02:43:56 UTC No. 16305367

>ASTROLOGY BAD!!!
>ASTRONOMY GOOD!!!
>No I can't justify these beliefs, but I know they're true anyway because thats the dogma I was brainwashed with during my developmental years.
>Everyone who disagrees is a heretic!!!

Anonymous at Thu, 1 Aug 2024 02:46:03 UTC No. 16305372

>>16293146
Mars effect in athletes is real

Anonymous at Thu, 1 Aug 2024 03:00:48 UTC No. 16305392

>>16295110
>the star signs aren't aligned anymore
>no astroretard has ever thought to check.
There was no need to check because the signs were never literal constellations. The zodiac is a coordinate system evenly divided into 12 30 degree segments; the constellations that the signs get their names from are all of varying size. This has been well understood since Ptolemy. Only dumbass jeets use a sidereal system where the signs move with the stars (while funnily enough keeping the 30 degree divisions which don't match the stars they are tracking)

Anonymous at Thu, 1 Aug 2024 03:09:21 UTC No. 16305404

>>16305392
>coping
I wonder why leo was called leo. If you ever ask yourself this, feel free to research it
You'll see I'm right.

Anonymous at Thu, 1 Aug 2024 04:17:34 UTC No. 16305475

>>16305404
It was called Leo because of the constellation that happened to reside in that particular segment at the time.
How about you do some basic research, retard? The zodiac is just a division of the ecliptic, defined to start 0 degrees at spring equinox, which was in Aries when the signs were named. Astrology hasn't been constellation-based since the fucking Babylonians or Ancient Egyptians.

Anonymous at Thu, 1 Aug 2024 05:46:30 UTC No. 16305531

>>16305475
It's also never been accurate, so that's a bit curious. If it can't work, why fix it?

Anonymous at Thu, 1 Aug 2024 06:21:55 UTC No. 16305565

>my clock has been stopped at 6:15 for 20 years
>I just checked my phone and it said 12:40
>I checked my phone again later and it said 1:22
>I checked again and it said 3:07
>I checked again and it said 4:25
>I checked again and it said 6:15
>I looked at my clock.. guess what it said?
>Surprise surprise... 6:15. Heh, what are the odds? My clock works perfectly.

Anonymous at Fri, 2 Aug 2024 19:30:40 UTC No. 16307493

>I believe in made up fictitious dark matter for which there is no evidence but I'm positive that astrology is fake even though there is scads of evidence that astrology is an accurate predictive tool

Anonymous at Sat, 3 Aug 2024 20:54:57 UTC No. 16308909

>>16307493
That is what soiyence retards actually believe

B00T approved at Sat, 3 Aug 2024 20:56:22 UTC No. 16308912

.

bodhi at Sun, 4 Aug 2024 03:08:47 UTC No. 16309306

I have always told the half wits here astrology is a legit science, it the study of how revolving magnetic fields (planets) effect "water" (humans are 75% water) and mental states. Sadly this board is mainly retards who are incapable of actually understanding anything for themselves and mainly just regurgitate whatever they have been told to believe from people equally as retarded as they are.

Anonymous at Sun, 4 Aug 2024 12:43:31 UTC No. 16309676

>>16292453
>You can't replicate coincidences
Tell that the to CIA.

Anonymous at Sun, 4 Aug 2024 13:30:27 UTC No. 16309712

>>16305565
/thread

Anonymous at Sun, 4 Aug 2024 14:00:00 UTC No. 16309742

>>16309306
>if I make it "sciency" then it's okay

bodhi at Sun, 4 Aug 2024 16:25:19 UTC No. 16309883

>>16309742
>If I pretend to know what I am talking about then am I still a retard?
Yes you are

Anonymous at Sun, 4 Aug 2024 16:30:56 UTC No. 16309886

>>16309883
>says something that applies to himself
>projects
Every time.

Hardcore Truckin' - WWG1WGA !CN8WwNqRfw at Sun, 4 Aug 2024 16:45:30 UTC No. 16309897

stars isn't aligned anymore, shit hasn't work since like 1500

Anonymous at Sun, 4 Aug 2024 17:28:01 UTC No. 16309938

>>16309306
Many planets don't have a magnetosphere, retard, and water is not magnetic, and the brain is not made of water.
So by trying to make it realistic you've officially disproved it.

Anonymous at Sun, 4 Aug 2024 23:33:24 UTC No. 16310350

>>16309938
>water isn't magic

Anonymous at Tue, 6 Aug 2024 06:04:38 UTC No. 16311845

>astrology is bad because black soience man says it is
>black soience man said
>i believe it
>that settles it
>t. 85iq

Raphael at Tue, 6 Aug 2024 17:44:10 UTC No. 16312397

>>16292418
Astrology isn’t a science

It’s just correlation

Anonymous at Tue, 6 Aug 2024 18:40:00 UTC No. 16312464

Sure are a lot of women in this thread.

Anonymous at Tue, 6 Aug 2024 20:06:58 UTC No. 16312555

>>16292418
human life evolved around seasonal cycles, the moon has daily cyclical impacts on the earth and stars signify changes of season, therefore, there is a high chance we evolved tuned in to the astral clock

#facts