Anonymous at Mon, 22 Jul 2024 20:04:00 UTC No. 16292580

>>16292572
Why indian camera has the best quality?

Anonymous at Mon, 22 Jul 2024 20:06:57 UTC No. 16292589

>>16292572
Why is China's so bad?

Anonymous at Mon, 22 Jul 2024 20:11:45 UTC No. 16292600

>>16292572
>Indians caught it at Lunar "magic hour"
Pajeets were born for great cinema.

Anonymous at Mon, 22 Jul 2024 20:18:27 UTC No. 16292612

>>16292572
they're all in on the conspiracy

Anonymous at Mon, 22 Jul 2024 20:22:11 UTC No. 16292620

>>16292580
they stole an iPhone and attached it to a probe

once human at Mon, 22 Jul 2024 20:54:56 UTC No. 16292671

>>16292600
>indian joker
based

Anonymous at Mon, 22 Jul 2024 22:45:44 UTC No. 16292836

>>16292572
Apollo missionsalready took great photos of the landing site, I fail to see why you would want worse images of it just to compromise the actual mission those photos are meant to achieve.

Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jul 2024 00:09:40 UTC No. 16292906

>>16292600
ChinChin, is that you?!

Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jul 2024 12:05:37 UTC No. 16293338

>>16292580
maybe they had a lower orbit? i could check it out but i can't be bothered

Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jul 2024 12:26:54 UTC No. 16293356

>>16292572
Go to your window and take a photo of an ant in the tree across the street. Let us know how it turns out.

Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jul 2024 14:00:40 UTC No. 16293417

>>16292572
no

Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jul 2024 15:16:14 UTC No. 16293469

>>16292580
It probably looks better quality because it has a higher contrast. Look at the craters, the sun is lower in the Indian picture.

Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jul 2024 16:16:26 UTC No. 16293530

>>16293469
thats a good point. they always aimed to land during similar light conditions to the one shown in that shot from the indian orbiter for the same reason.

Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jul 2024 19:20:04 UTC No. 16293793

>>16292572
You go up there and take a shot if you think you can do better