🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jul 2024 17:42:19 UTC No. 16293659
Umm bros? Can LHC really send information to the past?
Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jul 2024 17:42:40 UTC No. 16293660
No it can't.
Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jul 2024 17:43:43 UTC No. 16293663
I'm not even going to bother reading that but I assume it's based on a misunderstanding of delayed choice quantum eraser or other quantum spookiness.
Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jul 2024 17:45:55 UTC No. 16293664
>>16293663
It's not. But I recommend you read it, not because it's correct (it isn't) but because it's a really nice premise for a sci-fi novel. In fact, I'd be surprised if something similar hasn't already been published.
Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jul 2024 17:47:31 UTC No. 16293666
>>16293664
not him but it probably has been explored in works of fiction
the market is so saturated though
also >>>/lit/ is a great place to discuss fiction (sci-fi)
Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jul 2024 18:05:22 UTC No. 16293686
>>16293660
>>16293663
>>16293664
>>16293666
>/sci/ is a slow board, with many threads only getting a few replies for days.
>Yet within 6 minutes 4 posters have appeared in this thread to deny it
Really suspicious, isn't it?
Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jul 2024 18:05:22 UTC No. 16293687
>>16293664
>LHC is a collider and giant sensor
If I'm supposed to take this as sci-fi, it needs to be more creatively written so I can momentarily suspend disbelief. "Giant sensor" is unimaginative and bland.
Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jul 2024 18:09:00 UTC No. 16293693
>>16293686
i didn't deny anything fag
i pointed out how the market for sci-fi is already at capacity in response to other anon
you know why lurkers show up to these threads so quickly? they're interesting and inflamitory
=
potential fun to be had
cope moar and lurk moar
we ain't bots or shills, well, I'm not at least
the entire site has been flooded with 'em lately, so maybe you're on to something, but I'm not part of that something
and you didn't even read my post
but you still accused me of being sus
fuck you!
Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jul 2024 18:23:44 UTC No. 16293707
>>16293664
Can you point out how it is incorrect then?
Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jul 2024 18:31:44 UTC No. 16293716
>>16293707
Sure, that's not how space or time work.
Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jul 2024 18:34:39 UTC No. 16293722
>>16293664
John Woo directed a forgettable Ben Affleck movie based on this.
Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jul 2024 18:40:25 UTC No. 16293734
>>16293659
anything can. time travel is trivial.
Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jul 2024 19:04:33 UTC No. 16293778
>>16293686
I use a bot that auto destroys retarded threads like this.
Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jul 2024 19:50:29 UTC No. 16293835
>>16293686
Suspicious indeed.
Within 21 seconds someone responded to deny.
If OP wasn't samefagging I'm a little bit disturbed that a response came in that fast on this board.
Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jul 2024 20:23:07 UTC No. 16293879
>>16293659
tl;dr dont trust anything or anyone claiming retrograde time travel. not possible without negative energy, higher dimensional transversal or maybe some (completely fictitious) temporal uncertainties on the quantum level that do not exist and never will
Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jul 2024 20:28:04 UTC No. 16293882
>>16293879
Given what I've seen in this thread I'm starting to think the merchants are hiding time travel from the goy.
Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jul 2024 20:34:49 UTC No. 16293889
>>16293659
The thing that's way more important than the ridiculous conspiracy bullshit: how was he able to post on 4chan with a VPN?
Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jul 2024 20:39:08 UTC No. 16293894
>>16293889
By using a 4chan pass
Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jul 2024 20:40:22 UTC No. 16293896
>>16293882
based
>>16293660
>>16293663
>>16293882
the jew is exposed
Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jul 2024 20:43:41 UTC No. 16293899
>>16293882
idk what i expected from 4chan but ofc you believe in the schizoid retard conspiracy of jewish world control and extreme lobbying. go believe in flat earth next or something. at least it doesn't violate ALL of known science, just MOST of it.
Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jul 2024 20:45:21 UTC No. 16293902
>>16293899
ok schlomo
the goy know what you built the lhc as a time machine
time for damage control
Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jul 2024 20:45:31 UTC No. 16293903
>>16293894
What purpose does a VPN even serve here? Most will hand out your data to the feds, and it's especially easy for them when you pay for a 4chan pass, where all the payment methods can be used to deanonymize you.
Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jul 2024 21:18:27 UTC No. 16293954
>>16293879
>not possible without negative energy
negative energy is just potential energy
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jul 2024 02:40:01 UTC No. 16294260
Hypercymatic temporary signal bounce render
There's that future gigaproject minituarised in one way
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jul 2024 02:41:09 UTC No. 16294263
>>16294260
https://youtu.be/SHOy5HRCXxg?si=1VZ
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jul 2024 02:43:36 UTC No. 16294266
>>16294260
>>16294263
Hmm what about negative hrtz frequencies?
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jul 2024 02:47:44 UTC No. 16294268
>>16293707
its wrong because the author is a polcel
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jul 2024 03:51:33 UTC No. 16294310
>>16293687
>LHC is such a powerful collider and exotic sensor that even your mom can't comprehend his magnificent implication when I stick it in her.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jul 2024 04:06:46 UTC No. 16294329
>>16294266
Define frequency, and how you think it can be negative.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jul 2024 04:35:25 UTC No. 16294344
>>16293899
>I hate 4chan
>everyone on 4chan is so stupid
>except me of course, I'm a super special unique snowflake genius
why are you here if you hate 4chan and hate everyone who uses the site?
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jul 2024 04:48:10 UTC No. 16294352
Can you send Dr. Pepper into the past? I need to know.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jul 2024 05:13:52 UTC No. 16294360
>>16293659
Doesn't make sense, it would be like having an open 4chan post where anyone through all of time can just add in characters but not remove them, it would be indecipherable unless it was deleted and archived within the first couple of edits.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jul 2024 05:25:50 UTC No. 16294365
>>16294329
NTA, but frequency is repetitions per second and if the repetition is measured by way of cycles into the past instead of the future, it would be a negative rate instead of positive.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jul 2024 05:26:52 UTC No. 16294367
>>16294352
Dr. Pepper is already in the past, so that time travel mission must have been successful.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jul 2024 06:16:49 UTC No. 16294388
>>16293686
>retarded niggerbaby doesn't understand that there isn't anything outside the present moment
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jul 2024 06:22:48 UTC No. 16294398
>>16294388
Kind of like how you clearly can't comprehend what you would feel like now if you didn't have breakfast today?
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jul 2024 06:25:08 UTC No. 16294400
>>16294398
Whether or not you had breakfast is irrelevant, the past state no longer exists
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jul 2024 06:29:49 UTC No. 16294402
>>16294400
Which means that past state is definitely outside the present moment which you clearly can't comprehend since you are the type of person who doesn't understand what you might feel like if you hadn't been able to eat today.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jul 2024 06:34:29 UTC No. 16294406
>>16294402
>Which means that past state is definitely outside the present moment
Which is irrelevant, as it is no longer that state, thus no new information can be extracted from it, ergo it doesn't exist
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jul 2024 06:39:16 UTC No. 16294408
>>16294406
>Which is irrelevant,
Wrong it is totally relevant to being outside of the present.
>as it is no longer that state
Which makes it even further removed from the present moment.
>thus no new information can be extracted from it, ergo it doesn't exist
Which means it well outside of the parameters of the present moment, exactly the opposite of your original claim.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jul 2024 06:47:36 UTC No. 16294414
>>16294365
Are You acronyming not the asshole? Why?
And You're not going to gallivant that idea You just defined rather than invented and then praise satan, are You?
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jul 2024 06:56:45 UTC No. 16294418
>>16294414
NTA is the acronym for Not That Anon because I am not the anon that was directly asked the question just someone else who knew the answer, but genuinely has no idea what else you are trying to ask.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jul 2024 07:10:27 UTC No. 16294421
>>16294365
I wish you didn't answer for him, whenever anyone brings up frequency you can ask this question and get insane schizo responses.
Sure, you could model a mathematical negative frequency, but it is meaningless in the real world, which is why my question was interesting.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jul 2024 07:19:56 UTC No. 16294424
>>16294418
Okay! Goodluck!
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jul 2024 07:55:24 UTC No. 16294456
>>16294408
It is only separate conceptually, retard, the past and future are extrapolations, not physical occurences
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jul 2024 07:58:35 UTC No. 16294459
>>16294456
>It is only separate conceptually, retard
So the past and future do exist to the exact same degree as the present, you were just speaking "conceptually" when you said they didn't?
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jul 2024 08:26:01 UTC No. 16294478
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jul 2024 08:30:46 UTC No. 16294479
>>16294478
So then the past and future are outside of present moment and you were full of shit when you said there isn't anything outside the present moment?
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jul 2024 08:47:10 UTC No. 16294483
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jul 2024 08:57:29 UTC No. 16294487
>>16294483
So you just like saying retarded shit that is logically unsound so people will correct you and you can simply tell them no given you can't actually justify the retarded shit you say in an effort to garner attention?
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jul 2024 09:08:14 UTC No. 16294494
>>16294487
Try passing the mirror test before delving into topics outside your expertise.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jul 2024 09:16:39 UTC No. 16294495
>>16294494
Try making a logically sound argument instead of inventing strawmen so you can apply non sequitur ad hominem attacks instead of using reasoning and a healthy vocabulary to justify your original claim.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jul 2024 09:29:07 UTC No. 16294497
>>16294495
I'm sorry the concept of something not existing is difficult for your little smoothbrain, but if you can't figure out something as simple and self-explanatory as that then there is no point in entertaining your retarded ass
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jul 2024 09:35:53 UTC No. 16294498
If there is negative frequency, can there be Accelerated frequency and is that how the chronovisors function?
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jul 2024 09:52:12 UTC No. 16294504
>>16294497
What I don't understand because you can't explain it because it is logically unsound is how something can "not exist" without specifically being outside of existence, it has to be one or the other, by definition.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jul 2024 09:59:58 UTC No. 16294506
>>16294504
>I don't understand how my reflection doesn't exist when I haven't moved in front of the mirror yet it doesn't make any sense!!!
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jul 2024 10:08:45 UTC No. 16294512
>>16294506
That little metaphor might makes sense if there was only 1 mirror and that mirror was the only thing that could reflect and if we were actually talking about reflections instead of light itself.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jul 2024 10:47:58 UTC No. 16294529
>>16293659
Meth's a helluva drug
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jul 2024 11:02:24 UTC No. 16294537
>>16294512
>lose argument
>start spewing retardation
Sad, many such cases
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jul 2024 11:06:10 UTC No. 16294539
>>16294537
I didn't lose anything, you are the retard who came up with a silly argument that assumes 1 mirror is the only thing that reflects your image and only when you are directly in front of it when every drop of moisture at every angle of incident has your reflection embedded in it.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jul 2024 11:20:57 UTC No. 16294549
>>16294539
>I didn't lose anything, you are the retard who came up with a silly argument that assumes 1 mirror is the only thing that reflects your image and only when you are directly in front of it when every drop of moisture at every angle of incident has your reflection embedded in it.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jul 2024 11:24:39 UTC No. 16294554
>>16294549
Glad you agree, it was so true you had to make sure it was said twice. I accept your concession and you can quote this too all you want if you want to signal you have accepted it as truth too.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jul 2024 11:34:04 UTC No. 16294560
>>16294554
Take your meds and go to school, schizo
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jul 2024 11:37:27 UTC No. 16294563
>>16294560
What school did you go to where you were taught retarded shit like reflections stop existing the moment you aren't directly in front of the 1 mirror capable of reflecting?
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jul 2024 11:46:49 UTC No. 16294569
>>16293659
The LHC creates a black hole, which can be used to compress information, which can then be sent back in time.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jul 2024 12:00:16 UTC No. 16294580
>>16294563
Total ESL retard, at least make an attempt to construct an argument in line of the discussion instead of inventing random unrelated schizophrenic scenarios
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jul 2024 12:12:51 UTC No. 16294590
>>16294580
Totally sensible arguments like reflections don't exist if you aren't looking right at them?
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jul 2024 12:19:19 UTC No. 16294594
>>16294590
Nobody said that ESL-kun, learn to read, please.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jul 2024 12:19:37 UTC No. 16294595
>67 replies
>Still no detailed refutation to the demonstration in the pic, just a bunch of vague coping
Oh, which means it is indeed correct, otherwise why can't you basedentists refute it?
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jul 2024 12:30:39 UTC No. 16294603
>>16294595
There is nothing to refute, it's just retarded /x/-tier schizophrenia written by some tard who didn't pass 5th grade physics
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jul 2024 12:34:41 UTC No. 16294610
>>16294594
Based Natalia poster
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jul 2024 12:45:55 UTC No. 16294623
>>16294603
>it's wrong because... it's just IS OKAY?!?
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jul 2024 15:47:14 UTC No. 16294830
>>16294623
It's wrong because it's schizophrenic jargon without a shred of evidence or correspondence to known physical phenomena, now take your shitposting ass back to r*ddit and don't come back, faggot
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jul 2024 20:21:14 UTC No. 16295177
>>16294398
time is merely a measure of the motion of objects in relationship to one anther. If all motion were stopped, and there were no more energetic exchanges, there would no longer be the measure you refer to as time.
There is no "past" to return to. There are only accounts and evidence of past actions ingrained in material objects.
The 'Future' is what we make it, but truly there is only the moment and motion. Space and time are not things unto themselves, but measures of distances and difference in relationship to objective matter.
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jul 2024 16:02:27 UTC No. 16296115
>>16293659
It is possible, but not with 100% reliability.
Anonymous at Fri, 26 Jul 2024 06:33:21 UTC No. 16296999
>>16294594
wrong, >>16294506 said that
Anonymous at Fri, 26 Jul 2024 06:34:23 UTC No. 16297000
Anonymous at Fri, 26 Jul 2024 23:55:11 UTC No. 16298110
bump
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Jul 2024 03:47:13 UTC No. 16298364
>>16293954
No that's just potential energy, pretty sure they mean anti energy (think antimatter)