🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jul 2024 21:04:57 UTC No. 16293933
Is "climate science" really science? They don't do any double blind studies and they possess no predictive power
Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jul 2024 21:06:08 UTC No. 16293935
It's a science in the same way that "computer science" is
Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jul 2024 21:07:47 UTC No. 16293938
>>16293933
How on earth would you do a double blind study on something like the climate (which is by definition many year-long averages in global scale weather in a region).
Double blind RCT kind of studies are great for things like medicine or exercise science where you're trying to isolate a particular causal factor in a multifactorial process. It's basically impossible with something like climate.
Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jul 2024 21:09:19 UTC No. 16293939
>>16293933
>They don't do any double blind studies
I can't tell if these threads are made by bots or nolifers, but you guys are funny
Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jul 2024 21:10:42 UTC No. 16293941
>>16293933
THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED!
What part of settled do you not understand?
You don't get to question it anymore.
END OF DISCUSSION.
bodhi at Tue, 23 Jul 2024 21:11:42 UTC No. 16293945
>>16293938
>How on earth would you do a double blind study
You cant dipshit, that is the point
Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jul 2024 21:14:36 UTC No. 16293950
>>16293945
Ah, so your point is that you think "science == double blind study" even when that's a completey retarded standard that doesn't even make sense? Do you ask civil engineers to do double blind studies on structural failures for bridges too?
Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jul 2024 21:16:50 UTC No. 16293953
>>16293950
Yes. Astronomy isn't a real science either sweety
Anonymous at Tue, 23 Jul 2024 21:39:49 UTC No. 16293972
>>16293933
Climate is all about the arriving glacial period.
Temperature increase-> heat gradient between equator-north pole fades -> Gulfstream diminishes (measurable) -> area supporting snowfall grows -> snow reflects sunlight -> cooling accelerates -> glaciers form
Save your money.
>muh CO2
o, unfortunately. A lot of atmospheric CO2 will get diluted in the water around the glaciers and get photosynthsized by algea, eventually turning to oil again.
The Anthropocene is OVER!
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jul 2024 02:50:01 UTC No. 16294270
climate deniers eat tomatoes
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jul 2024 02:57:24 UTC No. 16294278
about a team of researchers studying dinoflagellate cyst fossils:
>By analyzing the fossils in different layers of the sediments, the team reconstructed the “paleoclimate” of southern Italy between about 200 B.C.E. and C.E. 600, with a resolution of roughly three years.
The reconstructions show that cooler periods—which had average temperatures as much as three degrees Celsius lower than the highs of preceding centuries for decades at a time—coincided with Roman reports of major pandemics
climate change killed the roman empire
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jul 2024 03:55:32 UTC No. 16294313
>>16293933
Why are you posting a twitter screenshot from someone roleplaying the matrix?
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jul 2024 03:58:26 UTC No. 16294315
>>16294313
why does this thread upset you so badly?
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jul 2024 12:50:58 UTC No. 16294626
>>16293950
Don't bother, the Anon you replied two has two working brain cells at best. While one is highly occupied trying to falsely comprehend information, the other is touching his sensitive parts
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jul 2024 12:57:12 UTC No. 16294632
>>16293933
>The architect
>Guy from The Matrix
>Being a pseud
Why is X (formerly Twitter) so cringe? Can science explain this phenomenon?
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jul 2024 21:27:42 UTC No. 16295278
>>16294315
I don't care about this thread. I just want to know why you're using a screenshot from someone pretending to be a character from a cringy movie.
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jul 2024 05:17:41 UTC No. 16295660
>>16295278
this thread clearly upsets you, why are you trying to deny that? your emotional distress is made readily apparent by the language you choose to use
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jul 2024 05:22:14 UTC No. 16295664
>>16295660
I think you're projecting, and I'm not that anon. Very defensive, repeating the same "insult."
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jul 2024 07:30:59 UTC No. 16295757
>>16293933
>possess no predictive power
hmm, it's been predicted for decades that average global temperatures would rise.
Are you trolling, or are you ignorant?
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jul 2024 07:31:59 UTC No. 16295758
>>16295757
>hmm, it's been predicted for decades that average global temperatures would rise.
seriously, OP, are you trolling, or are you ignorant?
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jul 2024 07:33:01 UTC No. 16295761
>>16295757
>>16295758
or are you getting paid by somebody to disinform others, OP?
Which one is it?
bodhi at Thu, 25 Jul 2024 11:01:08 UTC No. 16295890
>>16294626
>replied two
pottery, stfu retard
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jul 2024 19:39:13 UTC No. 16296364
>>16293941
this!
How dare you question our experts?!?! They said they know everything and they posted it on x and facebook, so it must be real! You're racist if you don't agree
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jul 2024 19:41:10 UTC No. 16296369
>>16294278
it's actually much worse than "climate". All cultures are very clear about what happened back then, but most people are too stupid to pay attention and believe the reality. This is why history is so messed up and makes no sense if you look at the mainstream version objectively.
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jul 2024 20:07:29 UTC No. 16296406
>>16293938
>How on earth would you do a double blind study on something like the climate
You cant, hence climate science is not science.
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jul 2024 20:09:03 UTC No. 16296412
>>16293950
The standard is the scientific method. No one said it was easy or doable every time, if you cant do an experiment because hard, then it isnt science. Theres no bending of the rules when it gets hard
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jul 2024 20:16:57 UTC No. 16296431
>>16296412
>standard is the scientific method
What is the "scientific method"? Don't use something that's debunked like falsifactionism or whatever
Anonymous at Fri, 26 Jul 2024 12:37:11 UTC No. 16297219
>>16295758
systemic error in measurement. If each of these were really the hottest we would see secondary and tertiary indicators. You would see rainfall records also being broken, you don't. You would see increased natural disasters, you don't. You would see increase global vegetation, you don't. Just a lot of people screaming that it will happen. Soon_tm
Anonymous at Fri, 26 Jul 2024 12:43:25 UTC No. 16297228
Holy shit, just shoot up some satellites that block 1% of the light coming to earth and be done with it. Fucking retards. It won't be more than $10 trillion which will be way less than <10% of earths gpd by the time it's actually done. This is a literal non-problem.
Anonymous at Fri, 26 Jul 2024 12:57:43 UTC No. 16297244
>>16293933
>Is "fluid dynamics" really science?
>Is "complex systems" really science?
>Is "computational physics" really science?
>Is "chemistry" really science?
If yes, then "climate science" is really a science
Anonymous at Fri, 26 Jul 2024 18:58:50 UTC No. 16297687
>>16295660
I am that anon and you're definitely projecting. Did you want to answer the question?
Anonymous at Fri, 26 Jul 2024 19:01:16 UTC No. 16297691
>>16297219
Retard.
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Jul 2024 05:43:07 UTC No. 16298515
>>16298479
>cherry picking a single date
>even waiting to cherry pick the coldest day of the summer you can't crack the top ten records for that date
>meanwhile June 2024 was the hottest June on record for the globe and for most individual countries
Anonymous at Sun, 28 Jul 2024 04:02:25 UTC No. 16299906
>>16298515
global warming is fake, sorry if that upsets you
Anonymous at Sun, 28 Jul 2024 13:21:13 UTC No. 16300339
>>16299906
Source?
Anonymous at Mon, 29 Jul 2024 00:54:27 UTC No. 16301207
>>16301079
How do you justify that metric?
Anonymous at Mon, 29 Jul 2024 02:38:05 UTC No. 16301309
>>16295757
Bull fucking shit. They were still teaching peak oil and the next ice age when I was in college. Literally articles about how we had two years in a row of the coldest temperatures ever in my state.
Anonymous at Mon, 29 Jul 2024 04:13:52 UTC No. 16301376
>>16301309
its easy to predict whats going to happen to temperatures when you can just adjust the temperature record to fit your predictions
Anonymous at Mon, 29 Jul 2024 19:41:04 UTC No. 16302287
>>16293938
>How on earth would you do a double blind study on something like the climate
You can do it, but not on Earth. If you think CO2 is a greenhouse gas, why not look at the effects of atmospheric CO2 on other planets? Mars conveniently has an atmosphere which is nearly 100% CO2, that takes other variables out of the equation. If CO2 were really a powerful greenhouse gas then Mars should have an enormous greenhouse effect give than Mars has over 3000% more CO2 per unit surface area than Earth does.
Mars' observed average surface temperature is exactly as predicted by the planetary equilibrium temperature equation which calculates what the average surface temperature of a planet would be if it had no atmosphere whatsoever, this proves that CO2 is not a greenhouse gas.
Anonymous at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 22:17:19 UTC No. 16303793
Anonymous at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 22:33:35 UTC No. 16303816
>>16302287
Mars has 2% of the atmosphere total that earth does