Image not available

1178x870

15m.jpg

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16294338

Is it possible to use math to accurately estimate the initial number of holocaust survivors if you know how many were left 80 years after the holocaust? Would you need to use actuarial tables to do something like this or could there be a simpler method?

Anonymous No. 16294348

>is it possible to estimate something without any actual data to back up your claims
Sure, just claim something and call everyone an antisemite when they ask for proof

Anonymous No. 16294359

Using this actuarial graph from the US https://www.cdc. gov/nchs/data/lifetables/life39-41_acturial .pdf for people born 1941-45, we get a survival rate of around 0.11 for 85 year old whites (the median age of a Holocaust survivor).
250,000/0.11 = 2.3 million estimated survivors. This isn’t 6 million, but this might because we are using average American mortality rates. I would assume the mortality rates of holocaust survivors would be lower, as starvation can’t help your longevity, and this could explain the under-estimate.

Anonymous No. 16294436

>>16294338
>estimate the initial number of holocaust survivors
don't we actually know the number? Why estimate?

Image not available

966x809

file.png

Anonymous No. 16294555

>>16294338
There were initially around -1300000 survivors.
And in 2010 there were no survivors.

Anonymous No. 16294600

>>16294555
Fucking kek, the Nobel committee will be in touch.

Anonymous No. 16294602

>>16294555
True and real.
/thread

Anonymous No. 16294889

>>16294359
>survival rate of around 0.11 for 85 year old whites
Were thy all interned at the age of 0?

Anonymous No. 16294903

>>16294338
what's really enlightening is using math to compare the number of jews living in europe in 1935 and the number of jews that emigrated out of europe between 1935 and 1945.

Anonymous No. 16294916

>>16294338
Some people live up to 120 so year 2065 is when my patience runs out

Anonymous No. 16294956

>>16294903
>is using math to compare the number of jews living in europe in 1935 and the number of jews that emigrated out of europe between 1935 and 1945.
You cant use math to know these things. Its impossible to define what a jew even is and nobody kept a real census of jew populations in eastern europe or russia. INB4, keep your almanac records, as if they had any valid source for anything

Image not available

800x811

Riegner_Telegram.jpg

Anonymous No. 16295112

Note that the official claim is
>by the end of the war in Europe in May 1945, about 3.5 million of them had survived.[2][11]

Curiously, give or take a few hundreds of thousands, that's also the estimate of jews living in german controlled europe before the genocide according to the World Jewish Congress secretary of the time.

Image not available

1280x769

c6f.jpg

Anonymous No. 16295162

Image not available

560x1477

1266880586788.jpg

Anonymous No. 16295240

>>16294956
>impossible to define what a jew even is
if only there were some experts to defer to

Anonymous No. 16295382

>>16294338
shut the fuck up, antisemite

Anonymous No. 16295457

>>16294916
nobody lives that long except for people with fake birth certificates.
lots of people fake being older in order to start collecting government pension benefits earlier in life, most commonly they adopt the identify of a recently deceased relative

Anonymous No. 16295462

>>16294555
Mathcels will defend this.

Anonymous No. 16295485

>>16295240
nehanderthals, basically

Anonymous No. 16296771

>>16295457
>entire family is living off grandma's social security check
>grandma dies
>"oh no we're all going to starve!"
>"hold on - I have a clever plan. hide the body and don't tell anyone she died, i'm grandma now"

Anonymous No. 16297984

>>16294338
>Would you need to use actuarial tables to do something like this or could there be a simpler method?
using actuarial tables would get you the most accurate result

Image not available

640x571

Holocaust.jpg

Anonymous No. 16298011

>>16294338
Statistically there is at least one thread in /sci/ mentioning the holocaust at all times.

Image not available

832x1200

dadbodwtf.jpg

Anonymous No. 16298577

>>16294359
>whites

Anonymous No. 16298670

>>16295382
kys kike

The holocaust occurred during WW2 and the number of Jews rightfully murdered was around 2% of the total number of people who died, similar to the Jewish population per capita

They didn't even get a nuclear warhead like Japan and they're still complaining about this shit 100 years later

We need to have another holocaust in order to match all the money and resources given to Jews

Anonymous No. 16299041

>>16295112
>Curiously
Very curious.

Anonymous No. 16299063

>>16298670
i don't like the jews but japan KINDA deserved the two nukes

Anonymous No. 16299738

>>16294338
every year the number of survivors increases. What's really interesting is the census before and after WWII is essentially the same, maybe 300,000 less after the war. Also interesting is the newspaper reports of the 6,000,000 jews who died in 1935 in Ukraine. Even more interesting is how many newspapers ran stories about jews and used the number 6,000,000 over and over from about 1890 to 1935 before WWII even started. So, I guess you cannot rely on the data reported in media as a basis for back calculating the population numbers.

Anonymous No. 16299740

>>16298011
Good. Never forget.

Anonymous No. 16300815

>>16299738
How many fewer Germans were there after the war?
How many fewer British, Russians, French, Italians were there after the war?
How many fewer whites were there in Europe after the war vs before?

Anonymous No. 16301962

>>16300815
>How many fewer Germans were there after the war?
11 million

Image not available

792x1024

b2d8506408aa4b27d....jpg

Anonymous No. 16302026

Anonymous No. 16303968

>>16302026
what information is learned by kicking the witnesses in the balls?

Anonymous No. 16305378

>>16303968
Its how you learn how many kicks it take to get someone to sign a false confession

Anonymous No. 16305429

Fun Fact: There are two different metrics for labeling someone a Holocaust survivor.

The term can refer to someone present in Nazi controlled areas for the duration the Holocaust who is a member of a group targeted by it. However the term can be expanded to include those who avoided the Holocaust by fleeing from those areas before it began.

There isn't a universally accepted definition and different groups and bodies can use either metric.

Anonymous No. 16305682

>>16294338
The correct number is zero, because the Holocaust never happened.

Anonymous No. 16306104

>>16298670
>2% of the total number of people who died
but what percentage of jews?

Anonymous No. 16307758

>>16294338
Yes, the number of holocaust survivors is zero because the holocaust never happened

Anonymous No. 16307797

>>16305429
>However the term can be expanded to include those who avoided the Holocaust by fleeing from those areas before it began.
what kind of pants-on-head retarded definition is this? I don't want to think people actually use this one

>yeah so I moved from NYC to California in 2000, so I'm a 9/11 survivor if you really think about it

Anonymous No. 16309305

>>16305429
how can their numbers have increased between 2016 and 2024?

Anonymous No. 16310102

>>16309305
Is it an issue that their numbers increased? Why should Holocaust survivors go extinct? Go ahead, antisemite. Explain.

Anonymous No. 16311553

>>16310102
If they don't eventually go extinct then that would make them the embodiment of "the eternal jew", which would be a very antisemitic thing to become

Anonymous No. 16311589

>>16305378
Look up that Mustang pilot whose life was saved because the Kempetai didn't know shit about nuclear fission. The physicist from Tokyo knew, and realized our protag didn't know shit either, but he had him fed and kept from beating "for further questioning".

Anonymous No. 16313003

>>16311589
That was Marcus McDilda, he was also the guy who came up with the 'dark matter' story

Anonymous No. 16314536

>>16309305
Dishonestly

Anonymous No. 16316184

>>16314536
its just basic talmudic mathematics

Anonymous No. 16317715

>>16311589
>The physicist from Tokyo knew
no he didn't, if he did then japan would've been able to produce it's own atomic weapons. if guy from tokyo had no idea what he was talking about. even decades later japan was only able to harness and use atomic energy because they were gifted the technology by western interests and even then the japanese did a third world tier job of implementing it.
>lets store the fuel for the backup generators at sea level so it can be swamped by a tsunami and cause a meltdown instead of elevating it so it stays dry and we'll have backup power in case of an earthquake.