🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jul 2024 07:34:39 UTC No. 16294437
an scientific experiment has been performed
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jul 2024 07:40:00 UTC No. 16294443
>>16294437
because of meme quotas
in some companies such as google and bbc they found that women get paid more for the same job and hours
yet somehow men on average still make more
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jul 2024 07:41:43 UTC No. 16294445
Understandable. Females are more likeable than males, and you want likeable people in your team, it's not hard to understand.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jul 2024 07:46:39 UTC No. 16294449
>>16294443
No it's because women have boobies and vaginas and you you're all testies, no shaft, and BO
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jul 2024 08:12:52 UTC No. 16294470
>>16294445
>Females are more likeable than males
No they aren't, it's bias
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jul 2024 08:17:40 UTC No. 16294475
>>16294470
>No they aren't, it's bias
that very answer proves my point.
/thread
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jul 2024 09:05:15 UTC No. 16294492
Nope will still live under a patriarchy where women are second class citizens and any example of men having it harder is actually due to flawed assumptions or methods or if it does exist is actually a good thing.
Anonymous at Wed, 24 Jul 2024 11:31:40 UTC No. 16294559
>>16294437
Anyone who has had to make grant applications and write DEI statements knows just how much better it would be to be a woman.
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jul 2024 05:35:23 UTC No. 16295670
>>16294475
No, lady, it just proves that you are a narcissist who only likes people who automatically agree with you since you clearly mistake agreeability for likeability.
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jul 2024 06:10:46 UTC No. 16295691
>>16294437
this was an observational study, not an experiment.
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jul 2024 07:28:07 UTC No. 16295755
>>16295670
>lady
wrong.
But, if I owned a business and wanted to assemble a harmonious and hard working team, I'd most certainly begin with women, have no doubt.
Oh wait, I actually did, several times. And it always worked out better with women than with men. How interesting.
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jul 2024 07:32:28 UTC No. 16295759
>>16295755
Sure it did, your businesses were so successful and harmonious that you had to abandon them to make other businesses instead.
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jul 2024 07:40:23 UTC No. 16295767
>>16295755
you would have to start businesses with women and men an equal number of times to come to any valid conclusion.
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jul 2024 07:44:28 UTC No. 16295771
>>16295755
Ok, so name some fortune 500 companies founded and primarily run by women.
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jul 2024 09:01:21 UTC No. 16295824
>>16295755
lol lmao kid, sims doesn't count
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jul 2024 12:44:06 UTC No. 16295958
>>16294437
so, how hard do you have to commit to the whole tranny act? can you just say "call me sandy," and continue to dress and act like a man?
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jul 2024 12:49:51 UTC No. 16295965
>>16294437
This has been known for a while. Decades ago feminists argued women should anonymize their names to get hired more frequently. Studies were done to see if this helped. The opposite occurred and women were hired less frequently. Feminists, like the good scientists they are, reversed their hypothesis and said women should show their names and that when male names were seen the patriarchy was working as intended.
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jul 2024 12:51:14 UTC No. 16295970
>>16295755
You are absolutely a woman lmfao.
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jul 2024 17:12:28 UTC No. 16296194
>>16294437
Now do the same but for healthcare jobs. Watch how you get double as a dude.
Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jul 2024 19:11:07 UTC No. 16296333
>>16294443
>Google
kek remember pic-related? Google discriminated against MEN and it was the WOMEN who complained. Female victim complex is insane.
Anonymous at Fri, 26 Jul 2024 04:07:12 UTC No. 16296920
>>16296333
did the men ever sue to get fair pay for themselves or did they cuck out?
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Jul 2024 04:41:04 UTC No. 16298440
>>16296920
Its Google, of course the men are cucks
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Jul 2024 20:15:45 UTC No. 16299406
>>16298440
most of google is jeets
DoctorGreen !DRgReeNusk at Sat, 27 Jul 2024 20:25:27 UTC No. 16299439
>>16295965
>This has been known for a while. Decades ago feminists argued women should anonymize their names to get hired more frequently. Studies were done to see if this helped. The opposite occurred and women were hired less frequently. Feminists, like the good scientists they are, reversed their hypothesis and said women should show their names and that when male names were seen the patriarchy was working as intended
lmao
interesting
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Jul 2024 20:31:19 UTC No. 16299447
>>16294443
it makes sense for restaurants and places like that, people want female servers. For cunt services (CS) it also makes sense
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Jul 2024 22:23:05 UTC No. 16299569
>>16295691
Explain
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Jul 2024 22:38:03 UTC No. 16299586
>>16299447
>people want female servers
I don't, women are disgusting filthy creatures, they're also vindictive and can't control their emotions.
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Jul 2024 22:42:32 UTC No. 16299592
>>16294445
Unironically there is some truth to it.
Having a woman in the team also subconsciously forces your team to become social, well-kept and clean as well.
Every single male dominated engineering team I've worked with were in companies that couldnt seek out talent. Even if the company had great success and workers were competent, the lack of interaction, the poor communication skills and the uneasy feeling you get working with dweebs does weight on your work. In big techs however there was always at least 20% females and it literally did make the atmosphere better. Women are scarce in this field so people put on their best behavior without realising it.
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Jul 2024 22:50:39 UTC No. 16299597
>>16299592
Only a woman would have this perspective.
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Jul 2024 22:54:06 UTC No. 16299604
>>16299592
You only need one woman per l;arge group to get the positive effects, adding more women just negates the benefits
Anonymous at Sun, 28 Jul 2024 04:18:04 UTC No. 16299919
Fuck Reddit. Do you realize their version of shit posting is just turning to gyp your feelings? Years of repost after repost, and now they have a whole scam stock
Anonymous at Sun, 28 Jul 2024 23:20:30 UTC No. 16301085
>>16299919
Reddit is owned by Advance Publications which is in turn owned by the Newhouse brothers, sons of Si Newhouse who was the American version of Robert Maxwell, Ghislaine's father. the Newhouse brothers even hired Ghislaine Maxwell to be head of moderation at Reddit, a position she held until she was arrested for underaged sex trafficking
Anonymous at Mon, 29 Jul 2024 19:12:13 UTC No. 16302238
>>16301085
Ghislaine Maxwell is still the all time reigning champion of Reddit upvotes
Anonymous at Mon, 29 Jul 2024 19:22:24 UTC No. 16302261
Sharing my anecdote here; I work in a tech field. I entered the field through a boot camp in 2020. The people who got jobs first in our camp were mostly women. One girl got a job three weeks after the camp ended. Even another dude in our camp noticed and said out loud, "yeah, they're all women! (who got jobs first)".
I eventually got a job of my own. A few women left my team for other companies. I asked one of them, "what was your interview rate?" and they told me they got interviewed from most of their applications. Then that woman and another who left our company got laid off from their new company but found new jobs pretty quickly. I asked another one of those women how often they were interviewed. Again, most of the applications granted interviews and they were even contacted by recruiters on linkedin almost every day.
Meanwhile, I have maybe a 3% interview rate from my applications and no recruiter has ever contacted me.
Anonymous at Mon, 29 Jul 2024 19:25:50 UTC No. 16302267
>>16299604
A mindset like this comes from the thinking of man = default.
Anonymous at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 02:39:08 UTC No. 16302741
>>16294475
>it's not bias when it benefits us, it is just because we are more likeable
When this kali yuga ends, you're all going permanently back into Pandora's box.
Anonymous at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 02:45:37 UTC No. 16302750
>>16294445
kys nigger
Anonymous at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 22:21:01 UTC No. 16303798
>>16295759
kek, no response, you fucking nailed that faggot
Anonymous at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 23:05:27 UTC No. 16303845
>>16294443
>because of meme quotas
Weird way to say systemic discrimination.
Anonymous at Wed, 31 Jul 2024 04:47:44 UTC No. 16304211
>>16299592
Kys niggress
Anonymous at Wed, 31 Jul 2024 06:55:35 UTC No. 16304327
>>16294437
Not mentioned: the male name was Patelreshnya and the female name was Anna
Anonymous at Wed, 31 Jul 2024 06:57:21 UTC No. 16304334
>>16302261
>bootcamp
Sorry we're talking about real devs
Anonymous at Wed, 31 Jul 2024 18:17:18 UTC No. 16304840
>>16294443
>in some companies such as google and bbc
Didn't you see that report on the fortune 500 companies? something like 90% of everyone they hired was a woman or a shitskin in the last few years. The system is now literally rigged against men and white men specifically
Anonymous at Wed, 31 Jul 2024 18:18:06 UTC No. 16304844
>>16295755
Blatant lie
Anonymous at Thu, 1 Aug 2024 05:21:04 UTC No. 16305516
>>16304840
>The system is now literally rigged against men and white men specifically
And that rigged system was implemented by financial industry jews
Anonymous at Thu, 1 Aug 2024 05:55:02 UTC No. 16305540
>>16294437
Circumcising culture.
Anonymous at Thu, 1 Aug 2024 19:17:00 UTC No. 16306123
>So I did an experiment
Yeah the post is the experiment
Anonymous at Thu, 1 Aug 2024 20:21:43 UTC No. 16306185
>>16294437
what i got out of this.
the women need 6 times as much as a chance then men to get the same job. give or take the gender balance already hired at the company.
Anonymous at Thu, 1 Aug 2024 20:24:23 UTC No. 16306190
>>16294445
and they dont like the men because the men were/are in charge. but one of the reasons they dont like the men is because theyre blaming power for their own demise.
Anonymous at Fri, 2 Aug 2024 05:06:36 UTC No. 16306623
>>16302741
Stfu pajeet go eat shit if you're gods truly cared they would have saved you from the British fags and muzzies
Anonymous at Sat, 3 Aug 2024 03:52:21 UTC No. 16308065
>>16294445
>Understandable. Females are more likeable than males
Exactly. And in the past, when men were almost always hired, it was simply because men were more likable. They are also stronger and smarter than women, basically superior in every way. It wasn't bias, just logic.
Now that leftist söyboys have become common, they have altered the situation because they are all stupid, weak, and unlikable.
Anonymous at Sat, 3 Aug 2024 04:13:17 UTC No. 16308082
>>16308065
Sọylent men have behaviors on par with mentally ill women. It's why they're so unlikeable, even by women.
Anonymous at Sun, 4 Aug 2024 03:26:09 UTC No. 16309324
>>16308065
>lets give people who can't do math the right to vote
Anonymous at Sun, 4 Aug 2024 22:41:31 UTC No. 16310308
>>16310294
Clearly, this demonstrates that gravity is a tool of whiteness and the patriarchy.
Anonymous at Sun, 4 Aug 2024 22:43:09 UTC No. 16310309
>>16308065
So is it going to take a full-on collapse to reverse this, or is there a point where men collectively get fed up and reclaim their natural birthright?
Anonymous at Sun, 4 Aug 2024 22:46:02 UTC No. 16310311
>>16310309
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JZy
>A History of Central Banking and the Enslavement of Mankind by Stephen Goodson
Anonymous at Sun, 4 Aug 2024 23:33:52 UTC No. 16310352
>>16294437
Why can't I find this post on reddit?
Anonymous at Sun, 4 Aug 2024 23:37:22 UTC No. 16310355
>>16294449
>>16294445
Females are more likable because they have boobies and vaginas, compromise?
Anonymous at Mon, 5 Aug 2024 00:12:48 UTC No. 16310378
>>16294445
>Females are more likeable than male
I thought that females were cheaper than males?. You know, the pay gap blah, blah, blah...
Anonymous at Tue, 6 Aug 2024 02:20:26 UTC No. 16311687
why the perception difference?