Image not available

436x533

1603471856549.jpg

๐Ÿ—‘๏ธ ๐Ÿงต Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16294770

What was the scientific reason for the YMCA requiring boys to swim completely naked while allowing the boys' families including the boys' sisters and female classmates to watch?

Anonymous No. 16294778

First of all social science is science (understand, jannies?) Secondly, according to social science which I cannot stress enough is a science, the patriarchy exists. This is indisputable and all social scientists agree it exists via scientific consensus. According to this patriarchy, females are subjugated as second class citizens and males are seen as the superior sex. As such, male penises are lauded while female anatomy is seen as taboo and must be covered. This is corroborated by Islam.

Again, jannies, this is obviously science and it is scientific consensus. Denying this is science denial and something only nazis do. This is supported by Nature's journal publications, which is the Paragon of scientific literature.

Anonymous No. 16294798

>>16294778
>First of all social science is science
Funniest post of the day. Well meme'd friend.

Anonymous No. 16294839

>>16294770
This was part of a covert eugenics program to allow young girls to evaluate the physical fitness of their male classmates to select the strongest young males with the largest BWC's for future mating opportunities.

Sadly, it is clear you were not part of this program since you didn't know this.

Anonymous No. 16295160

>>16294770
Probably an equality issue as some families couldn't afford to buy clothing specific to swimming. Might also been to prevent the pool from being filled with fabric debris and dyes from families that tried making their own swim wear out of existing clothes, which often were heavily soiled and worn out.

Anonymous No. 16296380

>>16294839
True and real.
/thread