Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jul 2024 18:11:38 UTC No. 16296258

you know society is fucked when a whore on youtube earns thousands of dollars per month or putting out a 5min video each week

Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jul 2024 18:12:38 UTC No. 16296260

I have never watched, and will never watch, a single video of this granny, EVER

Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jul 2024 18:14:12 UTC No. 16296262

There are more crucial threats, though it's good news cause I'm here and we will become the best. Whatever it's use, it has been used. I assume that's why. In a sense, it's a pity; in a more broad understanding of position, it's a gift - and it is a gift.

Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jul 2024 18:19:28 UTC No. 16296271

>>16296262
what the fukc are you talking about

Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jul 2024 20:03:29 UTC No. 16296399

Do you fags really watch YouTube for your science? It's not 2014 lmao

Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jul 2024 20:06:31 UTC No. 16296403

>yet another hossengoblin simp spam thread

Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jul 2024 20:35:30 UTC No. 16296456

>>16296252
MILF

Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jul 2024 20:41:18 UTC No. 16296466

>>16296260
I used to be a coomer just like you, until I took a mouse arrow and clicked on her recommended video. She is a much more tolerable Thunderfoot with a better sense of humor to boot. I'd rather watch her videos than some bold amerimutt creature fawning over a wunder discovery that will "change everything".

Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jul 2024 21:03:49 UTC No. 16296486

>>16296252
Is this picture altered? It looks like she has man tits

Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jul 2024 21:42:10 UTC No. 16296512

>>16296252
>hydrogen is bad
1 KWh of electricity -> powering electric car for 3 miles or household for an hour or dildo in your ass for five minutes, etc.
1KWh electricty ->making a spoonful of hydrogen -> storing it at cryogenic temps -> powering your dildo -> it blows your ass out
Forget about hydrogen, all the energy used to make it, store it, transpport it, make elctricity out of it again could just be used directly without losing 99 percent of it on retarded hydrogen nonsense.

Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jul 2024 22:18:54 UTC No. 16296553

>>16296512
The best way to get energy from hydrogen is to put 10^30 kilograms of it in one place and use solar panels. The second best way is using it to make hydrocarbons. People really underestimate the hydrogen storage issue

Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jul 2024 22:26:23 UTC No. 16296568

>>16296252
i had a sex dream that involved this german harlot

Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jul 2024 22:46:40 UTC No. 16296598

>>16296252
I cant stand her fake british accent. Basically unwatchable for me. Its sound so cringe when you yourself are a germ. Just roll the R it wont kill anybody.

Anonymous at Thu, 25 Jul 2024 23:19:41 UTC No. 16296627

>>16296598
It's a real German accent which she has because she's a German who learnt English from Brits, like most continental Germans.
Be stupid on some other board plz

Anonymous at Fri, 26 Jul 2024 05:40:08 UTC No. 16296968

>>16296627
German? She looks like a vatnigger

Anonymous at Fri, 26 Jul 2024 06:03:12 UTC No. 16296976

>>16296512
I don't know if you drones are being paid up by arabs or what but
>you don't need to power shit directly with hydrogen
>you don't need to store hydrogen under high pressure
>you don't need to transport hydrogen, you produce it locally

Anonymous at Fri, 26 Jul 2024 06:15:20 UTC No. 16296986

>>16296466
Nta, but It's sad that you believe those are the two alternatives. I agree that scientism is a disease and we won't be able to actually culturally progress further (with regards to genuine scientific achievement) until the "trust the science" crowd is drowned out by people who properly appreciate how little we actually know.

I like Sabine all things considered. Definitely not a fan of her ideas of "super-determinism" though. That seems like wishful thinking rather than dealing with the intractable aleotoric uncertainties that come with material reality (rather than the idealized abstractions where things can be deterministic).

Anonymous at Fri, 26 Jul 2024 06:55:37 UTC No. 16297016

>>16296968
Isn't she autistic? I remember seeing a video where she admitted to being on the spectrum. So maybe that autistic retardardation is on the mix as well, since autism will make you persistent and retarded.

Anonymous at Fri, 26 Jul 2024 07:13:27 UTC No. 16297034

>>16296252
SEX
RIGHT
NOW

Anonymous at Fri, 26 Jul 2024 08:17:10 UTC No. 16297063

>>16296252
Sabine is playing the game, she is open about this since she got the red pilled few years back after a failed research/academic career.
Imagine you having phd in math and you cant pay bills or rent.
So she is doing what everyone else is doing and I don't blame her.
I would not go that low tho,rather get a job as a cashier or something in the local market.

Anonymous at Fri, 26 Jul 2024 09:48:41 UTC No. 16297111

>>16296553
>solartard says hydrogen's storage problem is underestimated
kek

Anonymous at Fri, 26 Jul 2024 10:56:06 UTC No. 16297155

>>16297016
girls say they're autistic like they say they are virgin

Anonymous at Fri, 26 Jul 2024 10:59:46 UTC No. 16297157

>>16296512
>>16297111
NTA and not pro or anti solar or hydrocarbons, but it does seem like a no brainer, even if we do it the low tech way and just grow corn ethanol fuels. There are energy density, redundancy and refuelling benefits to the existing fleet of ICE vehicles, especially in niche performance fields like logistics and construction / industrial plant vehicles.

Anonymous at Fri, 26 Jul 2024 11:37:43 UTC No. 16297171

>>16296627
Shut you whore mouth you simp. Its sounds forced and complete cringe. And learn to read I said Im a germ myself.

Anonymous at Fri, 26 Jul 2024 12:43:35 UTC No. 16297229

>>16296252
God help me, why does that ugly German man's body make me so horny.

Anonymous at Fri, 26 Jul 2024 12:46:43 UTC No. 16297230

>>16296486

Anonymous at Fri, 26 Jul 2024 13:03:05 UTC No. 16297247

>>16297111
>slightly worse electricity for which there is already an entire global infrastructure
vs
>nearly impossible to store safely and no infrastructure or use case
The only reason to make hydrogen is to use it to make hydrocarbons

Anonymous at Fri, 26 Jul 2024 13:37:13 UTC No. 16297287

>>16297247
You make electricity from hydrogen you fucking retard

Anonymous at Fri, 26 Jul 2024 13:38:53 UTC No. 16297291

>>16297230
Quick work, very nice

Anonymous at Fri, 26 Jul 2024 13:50:48 UTC No. 16297304

>>16297287
You make hydrogen from electricity dumbass. It's a worse battery. Hard to store and move.

Anonymous at Fri, 26 Jul 2024 13:58:12 UTC No. 16297312

>>16296252
Cute monke

Anonymous at Fri, 26 Jul 2024 14:05:47 UTC No. 16297320

>>16297304
Why do you move hydrogen retard? You move the electricity, you are a chinese bot

Anonymous at Fri, 26 Jul 2024 14:33:10 UTC No. 16297346

>>16296252
Literal tranny

Anonymous at Fri, 26 Jul 2024 15:59:26 UTC No. 16297484

>>16297320
But you make the hydrogen from electricity? What use case are you talking about? Hydrogen as a battery? What that fuck are you saying? Do the Chinese have some stake that conflicts with hydrogen?

Anonymous at Fri, 26 Jul 2024 16:52:51 UTC No. 16297565

>>16297484
You are so dense. All this anus licking has gotten you a brain infection.
Go read on simple english wikipedia or something about hydrogen storage and maybe powerpaste.
Nobody is planning on putting a fuel cell in your dildo fag.

Anonymous at Fri, 26 Jul 2024 16:52:57 UTC No. 16297566

>>16297247
>implying the electric grid will work just fine if you plug in 999 squintillion solar panels
there is so much you don't know. the tldr is you need batteries, metric and imperial shit tons, and there simply isn't enough mineral in the ground to make them all. (Plus it's toxic and mined by congolese child slaves)

Coal and nuclear are the only two power sources that anybody without brain damage should ever even consider.

Anonymous at Fri, 26 Jul 2024 17:05:56 UTC No. 16297573

>>16296968
>vatnigger
Go back to /k/ faggot

Anonymous at Fri, 26 Jul 2024 17:06:39 UTC No. 16297574

>>16296252
She is a weird combination of woke and chud.

Anonymous at Fri, 26 Jul 2024 18:57:51 UTC No. 16297685

>>16297566
There's probably a way to make a much heavier and less efficient battery with more common materials like salt-iron, but there isn't enough solar yet to justify the endeavor. The steps to fit solar into the grid are much simpler than fitting in hydrogen

Anonymous at Sat, 27 Jul 2024 01:56:12 UTC No. 16298261

>>16297685
Even to build the solar panels themselves will need huge amounts of rare minerals and land. Plus you have to do it again in 25 years because they break that quickly (and cannot be economically recycled) meanwhile coal and nuclear can last a century or more.

Anonymous at Sat, 27 Jul 2024 01:57:47 UTC No. 16298262

>>16297685
P.S. I agree hydrogen is hopeless but I don't really care whether it is more or less hopeless than solar or wind

Anonymous at Sat, 27 Jul 2024 02:04:50 UTC No. 16298270

>>16298261
We're on the same page about nuclear, but this continent spanning retirement home is too ossified to ever relax regulation on it. Coal will run out and while it shouldn't be decommissioned it will eventually lose. I'm sure 25 years from now there will be enough spent panels that recycling them economically will be incentivized and solved. I don't know, I'm optimistic. I'm expecting the low cost per watt combined with the complete inconsistency and unreliability will lead to some semi automated industries with a high per unit cost from electricity to adapt somehow, so instead of five acres and a transformer you have 20 acres with a little factory in the middle with stuff shipped in and out daily. You could fill otherwise useless land. Like 100,000 acres of desert

Anonymous at Sat, 27 Jul 2024 02:08:27 UTC No. 16298272

>>16298262
Wind is shit as well. You should check out how much the amortized cost/watt of solar has changed over the last few years. It's sort of nuts how cheap it's getting. We're at the point where there might be an economic forcing function to adapting around the inconsistency, like battery packs in substations or in your house, or local industrial processes tailored to the weird timing. Seriously though check those numbers out, if you formed that opinion even five years ago I think you'll be surprised

Anonymous at Sat, 27 Jul 2024 02:15:50 UTC No. 16298282

>>16296252
Original GGG girl.

Anonymous at Sat, 27 Jul 2024 04:13:38 UTC No. 16298400

>>16296486
no, she's just german.

Anonymous at Sat, 27 Jul 2024 04:17:54 UTC No. 16298407

>>16297171
you don't sound any better, you're just a german and as such are naturally fucking retarded as well as crippled by autistic hubris. your main issue with that dwarf is that she is BREAKING ZE RULEZ and DAS IST VERBOETTENNNN!!@!!!. the day your people finally die out is the day actual europeans will become free.

Anonymous at Sat, 27 Jul 2024 10:11:32 UTC No. 16298705

Everything I see is dangerous

Anonymous at Sat, 27 Jul 2024 10:18:05 UTC No. 16298714

>>16296968
calm down, Avi

Anonymous at Sat, 27 Jul 2024 10:33:13 UTC No. 16298735

>>16298272
they've gotten sneakier about accounting. Solar electric bids in Australia are ridiculous, they either make nothing or they big -$5000 $/MWhr when they do it. (because that guarantees they get in when the actual price is set to somebody else's sensible bid) Brown coal meanwhile wins bids for $1/MWhr (1 cent per KWh). Batteries to store energy on a grid scale are ridiculous, and even micro-applications (e.g. a personal home battery) that are connected to the grid are only small scale versions of this. The actual reality is that every grid that has a high amount of renewables has some reliable form of power backing it -- coal, nuclear, natural gas or diesel generators. Occasionally hydro.
I also refuse to believe there are significant areas of the economy that can run on unreliable power. What businessman is going to accept shutting down the factory on random days (and paying the employees to twiddle their thumbs)? Plus all the uses that need power to keep something, e.g. refrigerators or aluminium foundries which absolutely must have electricity or the molten metal will set in the machinery and cause millions in damages. Maybe 10-15% at most could be powered as unreliably as solar delivers.

Anonymous at Sat, 27 Jul 2024 10:49:11 UTC No. 16298743

>>16298735
>I also refuse to believe there are significant areas of the economy that can run on unreliable power
>aluminium foundries
You picked the one that actually might benefit from this
>must have electricity or the molten metal will set
Just insulate a bunch of bricks with a high thermal mass around your equipment and it'll stay hot. I've seen some promising testing in this area
>What businessman is going to accept shutting down the factory on random days
I'm not sure of the economics here but it might literally be the cost/watt makes those costs worth it. We're measuring efficiency in dollars only so the machine time or the actual watt/aluminum is only a function of the number we care about. You'd need some plan for scaling and automation but a country like Australia with all its deserts and a 1st world population would be well positioned to be the hydrocarbon and aluminum producer for the Earth. That's a lot of otherwise unproductive land that could be paved with industry. Hell, dig swales before installing the panels and the water and shade would green your entire continent for a profit

Anonymous at Sat, 27 Jul 2024 11:04:11 UTC No. 16298753

What bothers me most about her is that she's really fucking ugly

Anonymous at Sat, 27 Jul 2024 11:15:06 UTC No. 16298767

>>16298743
How would you feel if your computer turned off on random days, it would be annoying and you would miss a lot of work right? Why would an aluminum company feel any different, they already try to go for the cheapest power they can by setting up next to hydro damns so I don't see how they would benefit at all from this.

🗑️ Anonymous at Sat, 27 Jul 2024 11:59:37 UTC No. 16298815

>>16298407

Holy hell the seethe, patch up your bleeding asshole and head back where ever you cockmuncher.

Anonymous at Sat, 27 Jul 2024 12:00:08 UTC No. 16298816

>>16298743
This country has like 9 separate grids because it's too big to unify, and nobody in between. Western Australia alone has 4. The transmission losses would be crazy.
Alumina refineries REALLY cannot afford to let the power switch off. Solar (wind too) tends to be extremely variable. I think this country has like 11000 MW of nameplate wind capacity, the most it has ever made is about 8000 and the least is about 300. And today could be a 500 day and tomorrow 5000, you can't run a grid on this kind of variation. Even with a country big enough to be a dinky continent, it's not big enough to escape the weather.

Electricity cost to make industries move? No, ridiculous. My pay (at a chemical plant) is $32 an hour. Electricity would need to be 100x its current (high) price to be in the same ballpark. Even if you could get 90% reduction in electricity use, it wouldn't matter, that's a failed grid on price alone.

Nuclear is the ONLY kind of renewable that can run a grid. Hydro is reliable but there are only so many rivers. And since both it and coal run steam turbines, let's build more coal and convert them to nuclear. Nuclear has a high capital cost but is the only power source that can compete with coal on a marginal basis.

Regardless, Australia makes 0.32% of global CO2, and we have killed our grids shutting down a handful of coal plants when right now China is building a new one every week.

Anonymous at Sat, 27 Jul 2024 12:01:44 UTC No. 16298817

>>16298407
Holy hell the seethe, patch up your bleeding asshole and head back whereveryou came from you cockmuncher.

Anonymous at Sat, 27 Jul 2024 13:26:44 UTC No. 16298879

>>16298767
Quit reasoning by analogy. You don't plan systems around how a company feels. Electricity and aluminum are both trackable commodities, I honestly think this one is an engineering problem not an economics problem.
>>16298816
You'd build the systems to handle the variable load and hook them directly to panels in a certain acreage around them. Aside from the lights in the office you'd be off grid. This sort of development is only just starting to take place but there's some promising progress.
>Electricity cost to make industries move?
Here in the US you have tiny towns whose only purpose is to farm the surrounding 1000 square miles, and solar is something like 100x as economically productive as farmland. If Australia invests in this sort of thing you have a good chance of being one of the world's largest economies. Most of the first world doesn't have land with no cities, farms, or life. Your GDP per capita could be the highest in the world

Anonymous at Sat, 27 Jul 2024 13:45:04 UTC No. 16298890

>>16298879
As an engineering student, the engineering problem is self imposed and absolutely stupid when we could just not.
Barring storage (which would be insanely expensive) you then have to build capacity to compensate for lost time, and on top of that add more lead time, storage and uncertainty to sheduling and orders to cover the possibility of a bad spell of weather.
This engineering problem IS an economics problem: when everything is twice as expensive, who pays for it? Why doesn't all business get exported to China/etc? As has already happened with manufactured goods because with our high regulatory standards we cannot compete.

Towns built for 1000 square miles are a relic of horses and carts. We now have cars and trucks, and such towns would never be settled today when you could just drive an extra 10 minutes from the next town over. You see this in the very late colonial areas" and very rural Western Australia is again an example of the tiny density actually needed now.
Solar as it is now is only profitable because of government subsidy.

>Australia invests in this sort of thing you have a good chance of being one of the world's largest economies
110% bullshit. We already have electricity; it would help out economy not one cent if magically all the smoke from it (0.32% of the world's) disappeared. The costs would be enormous and it would be far, far better for our economy to sell every solar panel and wind turbine and build more cheap Victorian coal. Our electricity would undoubtedly be cheaper, and require less land and labour to do it.

Anonymous at Sat, 27 Jul 2024 13:58:05 UTC No. 16298905

>>16298890
Also an engineering student my antipodean friend. I don't think you understand what I'm saying. The system would be designed around the unusual constraints of solar. This isn't a replacement for grid power for home use or something. I'm talking about completely independent solar based factories. No storage, no transport. I'm not positive it would be twice as expensive. For high electrical cost systems the trade-off of lower machine time could be worthwhile.

Anonymous at Sat, 27 Jul 2024 14:18:54 UTC No. 16298935

>>16298905
Remember when Texas tried it and all of their solar panels were destroyed by hail, multiple times, in the last year?

Anonymous at Sat, 27 Jul 2024 14:19:32 UTC No. 16298937

>>16296252
She looks like a man.

Anonymous at Sat, 27 Jul 2024 14:28:04 UTC No. 16298944

>>16298935
>spikey hail
I shouldn't have expected anything less from Australia. Anyway, that's an engineering problem people are already incentivized to work on

Anonymous at Sat, 27 Jul 2024 14:37:55 UTC No. 16298960

>>16296252
Annoying, self-absorbed mediocrity. unlike her, David Deutsch knows what he's talking about.

Anonymous at Sat, 27 Jul 2024 14:39:16 UTC No. 16298961

How much Sabine is paying to her shills to keep shilling her here.

Anonymous at Sat, 27 Jul 2024 17:59:48 UTC No. 16299194

>>16298961
Five deutschmarks per post, but I would defend my Fräulein's honor for free.

Anonymous at Sat, 27 Jul 2024 22:54:36 UTC No. 16299606

>>16296252
>proceeds to asskiss elon musk

Dude, for a million dollars I would ass kiss Musk too!... Heck, I would ass kiss you for that much

Anonymous at Sat, 27 Jul 2024 23:44:10 UTC No. 16299670

>>16296466
or, dont watch either of those insufferable retards

Anonymous at Sat, 27 Jul 2024 23:53:18 UTC No. 16299682

you morons think she's actually talking to Elon on the phone?

Anonymous at Sun, 28 Jul 2024 05:43:51 UTC No. 16299978

>>16296466

>enjoys thunderfoot

yep, its a midwit.

Anonymous at Sun, 28 Jul 2024 08:28:30 UTC No. 16300093

>>16298905
Or they could just burn gas or buy electricity from nuclear power plants, or just connect to a grid with renewable energy in it. Oil is one of the more expensive energy sources but its also the most popular since its so convenient, society pays extra for easier to use energy and this is no different.

Anonymous at Sun, 28 Jul 2024 09:47:31 UTC No. 16300166

>>16296252
Why doesn't she wear a bra?

Anonymous at Sun, 28 Jul 2024 09:52:22 UTC No. 16300171

>>16297574
What issues is she chud on?

Anonymous at Sun, 28 Jul 2024 10:22:54 UTC No. 16300188

>>16300171
glimate ghange and decepticons

Anonymous at Sun, 28 Jul 2024 13:15:13 UTC No. 16300329

>>16299606
"She" does it for free
>>16299682
Special ed

Anonymous at Sun, 28 Jul 2024 14:25:03 UTC No. 16300413

>>16296252
>2011+13
>watching science youtubers
It's almost all banal popsci stuff at this point

>>16296968
Calm down, Taras.

>>16300166
The same reason why you wouldn't wear socks if you had no feet

Anonymous at Sun, 28 Jul 2024 15:04:04 UTC No. 16300442

>>16296252
>back in the day we had VSauce
>now we have this
I want to go back

Anonymous at Sun, 28 Jul 2024 15:45:53 UTC No. 16300474

>>16300442
Youtube popsci was never really all that good to begin with

Anonymous at Sun, 28 Jul 2024 18:05:25 UTC No. 16300615

>>16300442
If he doesn't drive an ice-cream truck, he should.

Anonymous at Mon, 29 Jul 2024 09:09:06 UTC No. 16301566

>>16296252
Don't care still gooning to her vids