Anonymous at Fri, 26 Jul 2024 07:12:26 UTC No. 16297032

>>16297011
You can't even see the electrons or the sheets.

Anonymous at Fri, 26 Jul 2024 13:29:12 UTC No. 16297271

>>16297011
I was taught in school growing up as a Gen Z that the dna helix was discovered by a woman. I shit you not.

Anonymous at Fri, 26 Jul 2024 13:34:51 UTC No. 16297284

>>16297271
The reason she didn't get the Nobel for it is because she was dead.

Anonymous at Fri, 26 Jul 2024 13:41:17 UTC No. 16297294

>>16297284
>Guess what little goys, dna was totally discovered by a woman!
>But nobody credits her for the discovery, because she died! oy veeeey

Anonymous at Fri, 26 Jul 2024 13:47:10 UTC No. 16297300

>>16297294
Nobel prizes are never awarded posthumously.

Anonymous at Fri, 26 Jul 2024 13:49:41 UTC No. 16297303

>>16297300
>We can't award Goybel prizes posthumously oy vey Women invented everything gevault

Anonymous at Fri, 26 Jul 2024 13:51:23 UTC No. 16297305

>>16297303
Why so mad? It would have been a joint prize, not her alone.

Anonymous at Fri, 26 Jul 2024 13:53:00 UTC No. 16297308

>>16297305
>Why so mad, goy? It's perfectly fine teaching you little goys about non Nobel winners who never existed in (((school))).

Anonymous at Fri, 26 Jul 2024 13:54:30 UTC No. 16297310

>>16297308
Keep up the shitposting, your mom must be proud.

Anonymous at Fri, 26 Jul 2024 13:57:44 UTC No. 16297311

>>16297011
Yeah. All of their work was done by their assistants. All that needed to happen was for someone to say "I'm going to fund this project to shoot x-rays at bits of cells"

Anonymous at Fri, 26 Jul 2024 13:58:50 UTC No. 16297313

>>16297310
Keep seething.

Anonymous at Fri, 26 Jul 2024 14:13:05 UTC No. 16297329

>>16297284
>>16297300
>>16297305
>>16297310
Do you also believe female scientists are superior to male scientists?

Anonymous at Fri, 26 Jul 2024 15:59:26 UTC No. 16297485

>>16297271
LMAO, let me guess: it was a black lesbian woman with a penis.

Anonymous at Fri, 26 Jul 2024 16:38:39 UTC No. 16297544

>>16297284
Is it really the only reason ? As in, if she was alive, would she have gotten it ? It seems to me like Nobels are generally given to theoricians rather than experimentalist, see Einstein's Nobel for photoelectric effect which he got alone.

Anonymous at Fri, 26 Jul 2024 17:20:28 UTC No. 16297584

>>16297544
Nobel Physics 2015 was given to two physicists working at neutrino detection systems in Japan and Canada for finding neutrinos have mass, so nah. That’s heavy experimental stuff, large pure water tanks with specialized photodiode detectors buried deep underground

Anonymous at Fri, 26 Jul 2024 17:39:08 UTC No. 16297598

>>16297271
>I was taught in school growing up as a Gen Z that the dna helix was discovered by a woman.
Not technically wrong, she just wasn't the first.

Anonymous at Fri, 26 Jul 2024 17:43:04 UTC No. 16297607

>>16297544
Almost certainly it would have been Watson, Crick, and Franklin getting the credit. Without her work and advice they wouldn't have been the first to get the correct structure. Her being an experimentalist wouldn't have mattered, this was biology, not physics.

Anonymous at Fri, 26 Jul 2024 18:03:23 UTC No. 16297611

>>16297607
I see thanks for the answer.

Anonymous at Fri, 26 Jul 2024 19:35:20 UTC No. 16297742

>>16297011
It was discovered due to fact, that Crick did a lot of acid, woman didn't needed to be involved and was quite replacable, but he hallucinated it before woman put it together. Source of fact it was him tripping balls discovering it: Nature interview.
>>16297271

Anonymous at Fri, 26 Jul 2024 19:42:17 UTC No. 16297757

>>16297313
My garage has wooden doors and glass windows, but I bet leaving my car running in there would still kill me

Anonymous at Fri, 26 Jul 2024 19:54:04 UTC No. 16297773

>>16297757
Probably not and certainly not in a timely manner. CO is denser than air and will sink. There is a reason they get drunk and put a hose in the tail pipe. Such a vapid argument has no appreciation for what an industrialized process would look like.

Anonymous at Fri, 26 Jul 2024 19:56:03 UTC No. 16297777

>>16297773
So you don't disagree with my point?
As it turns out, more poisonous stuff will kill you even faster.