Image not available

250x228

1668443769215846trs.jpg

🧵 AI makes me stunned

Anonymous No. 16298069

I'm using the AI a lot, I ask it for obscenely complicated and boring jobs.
Sometimes when I ask him to do things I almost feel the immense effort it would take to complete them.
And she, obviously, does everything (almost) perfectly without batting an eye.
This inability to experience fatigue is shocking.
Needless to say, even these stupid and primordial AIs are already changing my way of working completely.
It's not just hype, I'm realizing it firsthand by using them.

Image not available

640x730

1680630248818260.jpg

Anonymous No. 16298116

I am continually amazed by how utterly mundane and flawed and undependable the "accomplishments" of AI actually are, and by how normies constantly act as if they are seeing a miracle.
But then I occasionally recall how technologically clueless the average person is, such that even their cell phone is (to them) a device from the gods that works by what may as well be magic, and if they had to make one from base components, even allowing unlimited size, they would die of old age before even completing the rudiments.

Anonymous No. 16298126

>>16298116
If you ask shitty questions you will get shitty answers
Speaking of gpt, the previous version was pathetic, unusable for anything.
This new version has changed a lot, and we are already starting to see glimmers of what it could be.

Anonymous No. 16298127

>>16298116
You can't add temperatures like that. It's °C and change in °C.
You start at 0°C, you change the temperature by 0°C, and you end with 0°C. Delta T = 0
You start at 32°F, you change the temperature by 0°C (0°F), and you end with 32.
1 delta T °C = ~1.8 delta T °F

Anonymous No. 16298139

When hologram tech comes and the first holodecks are built and we can finally go
"computer, simulate for me two scantily clad women fighting each other on a muddy surface over who should get to drain my balls of semdn first. disengage safety protocols, disable telemetry and disconnect from the internet"

Image not available

845x707

1716408195443195.png

Anonymous No. 16298152

>Instantly get two people trying to explain what ChatGPT should have said if it wasn't moronic, while simultaneously trying to say it isn't moronic.

Anonymous No. 16298159

>>16298152
>tricking ChatGPT to prove it's "useless"
It's not

Anonymous No. 16298160

>>16298152
I'm the delta T guy, and obviously chat GPT is retarded, but the retarded GPT convinced an IRL friend of mine that 0 + 0 = 64

Anonymous No. 16298162

Anyway as I said:
>Needless to say, even these stupid and primordial AIs are already changing my way of working completely.

That's not a "I asked ChatGPT who created the universe... waaaoooo" kind of thread.

Anonymous No. 16298172

I just use it to coom. I'm saving up for another A6000 so I can run that thing the French cooked up the other day.

Anonymous No. 16298191

I celebrate that I have lived to see the pure, unrequited joy of the same liberals who praised AI for doing their jobs for them turning in rage against the companies who now realize there is no reason to continue employing those same useless individuals.

Anonymous No. 16298199

>>16298191
most of them were useless even before AI
>head of people
>head of talent
>many degrees of HR roasties

Anonymous No. 16298202

troll thread

Image not available

1019x245

dumb ai.png

Anonymous No. 16298204

Didn't realize that the initial velocity matters

Image not available

1019x386

artificial failure.png

Anonymous No. 16298206

>>16298204
Wow. It still didn't get it. What sort of retardation is this?

Anonymous No. 16298211

>>16298206
Maybe because your question is fake and gay?

Anonymous No. 16298214

>>16298211
Explain?

Anonymous No. 16298222

>>16298069
AI is a boring job. I agree. It will never permute the arrangement of powerful people. It will paint watercolors of their children.

Anonymous No. 16298227

>>16298214
object 1 accelerated with constant force for 10 seconds
object 2, same mass, accelerated with the same force for 10 seconds
Why should the initial velocity make any difference? You didn't specify that the final velocity will be the same

Image not available

830x660

yahoo-1994.png

Anonymous No. 16298504

>>16298069
yes, it truly is amazing, and this is only the beginning.
AI right now is like the internet in 1994. People can't even fathom what things are going to be like in 30 years.

However, avoid using AI for work like writing and editing text, try and work on what you need on your own as much as possible, or you will become less intelligent as time passes and your put your brain through less and less effort.

Anonymous No. 16298608

>>16298116
>gpt-3.5
>>16298126
>>16298127
He is using GPT-3.5.

Image not available

503x378

1721909944253890.png

Cult of Passion No. 16298623

>>16298069
>I ask him
>And she

>>16298116
based and "no me"-pilled ai

🗑️ Anonymous No. 16298649

>>16298227
If you apply the same for for the same amount of time for the same mass, obviously the energy is going to be different if the other object already os moving before acceleration starts. By having more initial speed, the force is applied for a longer distance which increases the energy required which you get by multiplying force by distance.

Anonymous No. 16298652

>>16298227
If you apply the same force for the same amount of time for the same mass, obviously the energy used is not necessarily going to be the same. By having more initial speed, the force is then applied for a longer distance which increases the energy required which you get by multiplying force by distance.

Anonymous No. 16298755

>>16298652
physics is a fraud

Anonymous No. 16299145

>>16298069
AI researches make me stunned because they decided to use the most retarded method to create AI.

Anonymous No. 16299161

>>16299145
and they succeeded

Anonymous No. 16299656

>>16298608
Ok, so do it on 4, exact same prompt, and post results.

Image not available

1080x2148

Screenshot_202407....jpg

Anonymous No. 16299969

>>16299656

Image not available

1080x2132

Screenshot_202407....jpg

Anonymous No. 16299971

>>16299969

Anonymous No. 16299972

>>16299969
Does the ESL space before the question mark change it?