Anonymous at Sat, 27 Jul 2024 10:01:45 UTC No. 16298700

>>16298695
Speak for yourself. I use adapalene and glycolic acid peels, do photofacials, and still routinely get mistaken for underage b& by the liquor clerks despite being 6'1" 215lbs.

>t. patrick bateman

Anonymous at Sat, 27 Jul 2024 12:43:43 UTC No. 16298837

>>16298695
Because men are smart but women and animals are not much

Anonymous at Sat, 27 Jul 2024 12:48:33 UTC No. 16298844

>>16298695
Do peacocks "put effort into their appearance"? After all, their appearance is entirely genetic. They can't change anything about it. The same goes for humans. Some men are naturally attractive (tall, deep voice, masculine face) and others are naturally unattractive (manlets, ...).

Anonymous at Sat, 27 Jul 2024 13:14:32 UTC No. 16298866

>>16298695
Men externalize shows of resources in ways beyond cosmetic beauty. The difference between a Rolex and a Casio in the ability to display time correctly is not worth the price difference. The purpose is to signal magnitude of wealth.

Anonymous at Sat, 27 Jul 2024 14:19:11 UTC No. 16298936

Hot take: We do and the only reason why we human males find human females more aesthetic is because we are biologically ingrained to find human females sexually attractive.

In how many sexually dimorphic species are the females more aesthetic than the males?
So what are the chances human women are truly more aesthetic than human men and it's not a severe case of bias?

Anonymous at Sat, 27 Jul 2024 14:19:37 UTC No. 16298938

>>16298695
Check out the Stanford university lectures on human behaviour. There’s a lot of questions answered there, including this one

Anonymous at Sat, 27 Jul 2024 14:35:18 UTC No. 16298955

>>16298844
>After all, their appearance is entirely genetic.
No 'cause birds who don't eat well don't have pretty colors.

>>16298936
>In how many sexually dimorphic species are the females more aesthetic than the males?
Exhibit A: a female mallard duck. Even though here feathers are mostly brown overall her shape especially when young has a typical female aesthetic that is more beautiful. On the other hand: male cats seem to have rounder faces that seem to be more aesthetic.

Anonymous at Sat, 27 Jul 2024 14:35:25 UTC No. 16298956

>>16298936
I suckle big booba as a child, I like big booba as a man.

Anonymous at Sat, 27 Jul 2024 14:40:54 UTC No. 16298963

>>16298695
>Female peacock
Female peafowl are called peahen.
Why must zoomers torture the language so?

Anonymous at Sat, 27 Jul 2024 14:53:03 UTC No. 16298978

>>16298955
>No 'cause birds who don't eat well don't have pretty colors.
Are the birds aware of this connection though?

Anonymous at Sat, 27 Jul 2024 15:17:27 UTC No. 16299005

>>16298978
Even if you consider birds to be automatons still it depends on their environment how well the automaton develops and functions. Genetically they may have what it takes to be attractive and reproduce but just look at the ducks in the pond: those who have the misfortune of being fed by dumb humans who give bread to ducks become less healthy/attractive.

Anonymous at Sat, 27 Jul 2024 15:52:58 UTC No. 16299040

>>16298963
Would "female peacock" imply a trans male or a trans female?

Anonymous at Sat, 27 Jul 2024 16:00:37 UTC No. 16299054

>>16299040
You're arguing about female mankind. Only woke left trannies care about controlling language and pretending not to understand the obvious meaning of words which in this case is referring to a species with the name of the male member of that species. In a similar fashion we use the word chicken only to refer to hens and the word bitch only applies to human females and never to female dogs.

Anonymous at Sat, 27 Jul 2024 16:03:11 UTC No. 16299057

>>16299054
>we use the word chicken only to refer to hens and the word bitch only applies to human females and never to female dogs
Peak zoomerism.
Tell me, zoomer, would a "female peacock" be a trans man or a trans woman in your world?

Anonymous at Sat, 27 Jul 2024 16:07:43 UTC No. 16299064

>>16299057
What do you mean when you refer to your cock and why to they call you dick?

Anonymous at Sat, 27 Jul 2024 16:10:36 UTC No. 16299072

>>16298695
>Why don't human males put as much effort into their appearance to attact females and in other species?

6'4" Young White male (no deformities)

Anonymous at Sat, 27 Jul 2024 16:20:02 UTC No. 16299086

>>16299064
That the meaning of a word can vary according to register has nothing to do with the fact that writing "female peacock" in a zoological context is wrong. I'm just curious whether the implied peafowl would be a trans man or a trans woman.

Anonymous at Sat, 27 Jul 2024 19:48:27 UTC No. 16299338

>>16298695
>>>/fit/