๐งต Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Jul 2024 11:36:29 UTC No. 16298791
Fourier and Laplace transform are literally black magic and yet people still refuse to acknowledge that math is heresy
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Jul 2024 11:37:34 UTC No. 16298792
That's fine, no one cares what you think.
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Jul 2024 11:48:34 UTC No. 16298807
>>16298791
laplace transformation from power series
[math] \displaystyle
\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} a_n x^n = A(x) \\
\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} a(n) x^n = A(x) \\
a(n) \sim \! \sim \! \sim \! \! \! > A(x) \\
a(n) = 1 \sim \! \sim \! \sim \! \! \! > \frac{1}{1-x} \: \: \, ,\: \: \: \left | x \right | < 1 \\
a(n) = \frac{1}{n!} \sim \! \sim \! \sim \! \! \! > e^x \\
\text{continuous analog:} \\
\int_{0}^{\infty} a(t) x^t dt = A(x) \: \: \, ,\: \: \: 0 < x < 1 \Rightarrow ln(x) < 0 \\
x^t = \left ( e^{ln(x)} \right )^t \: \: \, ,\: \: \: -s = ln(x) \Rightarrow x = e^{-s} \\
\int_{0}^{\infty} f(t) e^{-st} dt = F(s)
\\
[/math]
https://youtu.be/sZ2qulI6GEk?t=1m
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Jul 2024 12:21:36 UTC No. 16298829
>>16298791
>are literally black magic
So when will you enter my magical realm, OP?
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Jul 2024 19:11:36 UTC No. 16299282
>>16298791
Ah yes. People are able to reason using complex tricks, therefore math is the post baptismal denial of a revealed truth. Bravo, OP. You figured it out.
Anonymous at Sun, 28 Jul 2024 15:14:06 UTC No. 16300448
>>16299282
>expecting an intelligent post from a frogposter
Anonymous at Mon, 29 Jul 2024 01:36:37 UTC No. 16301245
>>16298791
>magic
it feels magical because mathematics waste your concentration with non sense names for everything, its NAME THING for hundred things in a row because everything has to be named after the person instead of developing a pragmatic naming convention to describe said thing and now you're forced to just know names and what they mean instead of having self descriptions that aid in understanding
Anonymous at Mon, 29 Jul 2024 09:20:10 UTC No. 16301573
>>16301245
>getting filtered by a mere naming convention
You were never gonna make it anyway
Anonymous at Mon, 29 Jul 2024 09:28:21 UTC No. 16301577
>>16298791
Laplace's Demon.
Anonymous at Mon, 29 Jul 2024 09:36:57 UTC No. 16301580
>>16298791
that's only stage 1 black magic that can be understood and made into light 3B1B literally makes it intuitive basic geometry now...
stage 2 of black magic is projective mapping turning complex plane into a riemannian sphere appending "infinity points" to make sense of phenomena. just see the smith chart, that's stage 2 of black magic
Anonymous at Mon, 29 Jul 2024 09:39:27 UTC No. 16301584
>>16301580
fucking https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Riema
extended complex plane/number C U {inf}, fucking stereographic projection
Anonymous at Mon, 29 Jul 2024 09:40:27 UTC No. 16301586
>>16301245
language is a slave not a master
Anonymous at Mon, 29 Jul 2024 09:43:29 UTC No. 16301589
>>16298791
also spinors being SU(2) or rather 4D rotations. 360 degree is not a full turn but 720 degrees (electron spins)
fucking rotations are fucking translations about the infinity point. EVERYTHING IS A FUCKING ROTATION EVERYTHING IS ROTATING IT'S A FUCKING CIRCLE NIETZSCHE WAS FUCKING RIGHT EVERYTHIGN RECURS. YOU THINK YOU'RE MOVING FORWARD NO FUCKER YOU'RE REPEATING EVERYTHING YOU'RE EVERYONE. YOU DIE YOU BECOME YOUR MOTHER. YOU DIE. YOU BECOME YOUR FATHER. YOU DIE YOU BECOME FUCKING YOUR SON. YOU DIE YOU BECOME YOUR FUCKING BUS DRIVER....
Anonymous at Mon, 29 Jul 2024 09:47:52 UTC No. 16301595
>>16301589
ALSO FUCKTARDS..... LAPLACE AND FOURIER TRANSFORAMTION ARE FUCKING ROTATIONS... YOU FUCKING WRAP FUNCTIONS ON AN EULER ROTATION FUNCTION. AND YOU ROTATE THE FUCKER UP TO INFINITY...
YOU FUCKING ROTATE A FUCTION f(t) -L(f(t){s} -> F(s) UP TO INFINITY ABOUT DIFFERNET EULER FUNCTION FREQUENCYIES.
FUCK FUCK FUCKFUDKUKFUDKUFUDKUFDUKFUKDUFUDF
YIOU'RE ALL FUCKING INSANE. YOU'RE ALL FUCKING ANTS FUCKING FUCKTARDS
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LEK
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LEK
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LEK
Anonymous at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 01:18:50 UTC No. 16302653
>>16301586
as such 1984's newspeak is inaccurate
Anonymous at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 15:10:07 UTC No. 16303360
>>16298791
Laplace transform originated in probability theory. Euler was already aware of such transforms before Laplace. Google wiki and tackle the subject from the sources