🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Jul 2024 14:16:17 UTC No. 16298932
Were Bruce Rind's findings ever properly refuted?
Just reading the wikipedia article shows that he had a sufficient answer to most of the popular criticisms by other scholars.
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Jul 2024 14:36:03 UTC No. 16298958
>>16298932
Honestly the guy sounds like a pedophile trying to justify his pervertion. It was said that once we let gays marry it would progress to kids, and bam. Look at the amount of pedo apologies you see in academia today. Fuck, even back then the gays had only just been accepted and already they were trying to push the deconstruction of western morality.
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Jul 2024 15:45:50 UTC No. 16299031
>>16298958
As an aside, do you think this is enough reason to discredit him as a whole?
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Jul 2024 21:26:20 UTC No. 16299503
These days, troons and hoes are the only people thinking of sex all day.
Anonymous at Sun, 28 Jul 2024 05:55:54 UTC No. 16299984
>>16299503
Is that why the birth rates are at an all-time low?
Anonymous at Sun, 28 Jul 2024 06:12:08 UTC No. 16299992
>>16299984
with the advent of contraception and safe abortions, birth rates and sex rates are not linked anymore.
Anonymous at Sun, 28 Jul 2024 06:14:52 UTC No. 16299996
>>16299992
>birth rates and sex rates are not linked anymore.
Except, we have countless articles written about zoomers not having sex.
https://www.newsnationnow.com/us-ne
People's interest in sex outside of porn has dropped dramatically, let's not kid ourselves.
Anonymous at Sun, 28 Jul 2024 06:23:11 UTC No. 16300004
>>16300000
How can a normalfag look at this and not at least be a tiny bit suspicious about why academia is destroying its own credibility to serve the interests of a tiny religious minority?
Anonymous at Sun, 28 Jul 2024 06:26:25 UTC No. 16300007
>>16300000
Quints of truth.
Anonymous at Sun, 28 Jul 2024 06:32:39 UTC No. 16300020