Image not available

1024x1024

relativity police.jpg

๐Ÿงต The Laws of Physics

Anonymous No. 16299013

When the laws of physics are violated, do we update the laws of physics, or do we punish those who violated the laws of physics?

Image not available

330x220

ufo.gif

Anonymous No. 16299014

>i'm sorry, you can't fly that here

Anonymous No. 16299016

>>16299014
when theory and observation conflict, the observation is wrong.

Image not available

1024x1024

tesla in jail iv.jpg

Anonymous No. 16299055

>i'm sorry mr. tesla, there is nothing left to "discover"

Anonymous No. 16299060

We cope with some stupid theory of everything and reject explanations that don't posit a crazy degree of simplicity.

Image not available

1024x1024

tesla in jail ii.jpg

Anonymous No. 16299065

>>16299060
>i'm afraid there are only three dimensions, mr. tesla
>four, if you count my theories

Anonymous No. 16299221

>>16299013
To many laws of physics, abide by thermodynamics first then be a law abiding physic

Anonymous No. 16299302

>>16299016
you mean the other way around, right?

Anonymous No. 16299457

>>16299014
>>16299016
Its not braking any laws of physics, retards. It's just beyond our known technology.

Anonymous No. 16299497

>>16299013
A lot of normie retards treat the "laws" of physics as unchanging and infallible.

Anonymous No. 16299550

>>16299457
The absolute cope.
Explain then how any possible object that size can perform the kind of acceleration/deceleration maneuver those things are doing without breaking any known physical "laws". Not to mention the implication of FTL.

Also which pseud's genius idea was it to call anything coming out of science "laws" as if empirical methods can yield eternal truth that won't one experiment away from the trash can. Absolute grifter move.

Anonymous No. 16299625

>>16299550
>Also which pseud's genius idea was it to call anything coming out of science "laws" as if empirical methods can yield eternal truth that won't one experiment away from the trash can. Absolute grifter move.
Do you know how hard it is for something to be declared a scientific law?

Anonymous No. 16299627

>>16299302
I meant what I said

Anonymous No. 16299629

>>16299550
electromagnetic gravitics, some kind of quantum consciousness stuff

Anonymous No. 16299726

>>16299550
I'm looking at the video.
It's not really moving all that strange if it's IR footage of an airplane.
Have you seen IR footage of an airplane?

๐Ÿ—‘๏ธ Anonymous No. 16299767

>>16299726
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oz0p6QXHh9E&ab_channel=ForbesBreakingNews
>4:35

Anonymous No. 16299777

>>16299629
Is not quantic just because is to fast or to small, I miss just calling them subatomic

Anonymous No. 16299778

>>16299726
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s45xZAevb-w&ab_channel=AllStarPodcastCompilation
>6:35
>estimated at 60x speed of SR-71
No, but he has.

Anonymous No. 16299784

>>16299778
I don't know if you watched the same video I did, it shows none of that.
Look at it.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=UwOMwAGVwvs
You can see how fast the jets are by how fast the clouds move in comparison. Compare them to your first video.

Anonymous No. 16299899

>>16299778
One thing that trips me up a little is that when he says the object "disappeared" on him, that doesn't necessarily prove it flew off. Maybe it just turned on some cloaking tech so that he couldn't see it.

Image not available

1024x1024

tesla in jail iii.jpg

Anonymous No. 16300838

Anonymous No. 16301424

Down with the sickness

Anonymous No. 16301445

>>16299060
>>16299627

>decades if not centuries of rigorous math and physics don't match what they detector shows
>yeah, lets toss out literally 10s of thousands of years worth of man hours because the detector that chang designed on his rush to a graduate degree doesn't align with it

lol. lmao even