🧵 The Laws of Physics
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Jul 2024 15:26:37 UTC No. 16299013
When the laws of physics are violated, do we update the laws of physics, or do we punish those who violated the laws of physics?
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Jul 2024 15:33:36 UTC No. 16299016
>>16299014
when theory and observation conflict, the observation is wrong.
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Jul 2024 16:04:39 UTC No. 16299060
We cope with some stupid theory of everything and reject explanations that don't posit a crazy degree of simplicity.
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Jul 2024 16:08:03 UTC No. 16299065
>>16299060
>i'm afraid there are only three dimensions, mr. tesla
>four, if you count my theories
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Jul 2024 18:19:39 UTC No. 16299221
>>16299013
To many laws of physics, abide by thermodynamics first then be a law abiding physic
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Jul 2024 19:29:41 UTC No. 16299302
>>16299016
you mean the other way around, right?
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Jul 2024 20:46:46 UTC No. 16299457
>>16299014
>>16299016
Its not braking any laws of physics, retards. It's just beyond our known technology.
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Jul 2024 21:19:53 UTC No. 16299497
>>16299013
A lot of normie retards treat the "laws" of physics as unchanging and infallible.
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Jul 2024 22:13:10 UTC No. 16299550
>>16299457
The absolute cope.
Explain then how any possible object that size can perform the kind of acceleration/deceleration maneuver those things are doing without breaking any known physical "laws". Not to mention the implication of FTL.
Also which pseud's genius idea was it to call anything coming out of science "laws" as if empirical methods can yield eternal truth that won't one experiment away from the trash can. Absolute grifter move.
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Jul 2024 23:08:14 UTC No. 16299625
>>16299550
>Also which pseud's genius idea was it to call anything coming out of science "laws" as if empirical methods can yield eternal truth that won't one experiment away from the trash can. Absolute grifter move.
Do you know how hard it is for something to be declared a scientific law?
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Jul 2024 23:12:01 UTC No. 16299627
>>16299302
I meant what I said
Anonymous at Sat, 27 Jul 2024 23:13:01 UTC No. 16299629
>>16299550
electromagnetic gravitics, some kind of quantum consciousness stuff
Anonymous at Sun, 28 Jul 2024 00:29:25 UTC No. 16299726
>>16299550
I'm looking at the video.
It's not really moving all that strange if it's IR footage of an airplane.
Have you seen IR footage of an airplane?
🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 28 Jul 2024 01:04:14 UTC No. 16299767
>>16299726
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oz0
>4:35
Anonymous at Sun, 28 Jul 2024 01:11:37 UTC No. 16299777
>>16299629
Is not quantic just because is to fast or to small, I miss just calling them subatomic
Anonymous at Sun, 28 Jul 2024 01:13:49 UTC No. 16299778
>>16299726
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s45
>6:35
>estimated at 60x speed of SR-71
No, but he has.
Anonymous at Sun, 28 Jul 2024 01:21:30 UTC No. 16299784
>>16299778
I don't know if you watched the same video I did, it shows none of that.
Look at it.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=UwOMwAG
You can see how fast the jets are by how fast the clouds move in comparison. Compare them to your first video.
Anonymous at Sun, 28 Jul 2024 03:55:07 UTC No. 16299899
>>16299778
One thing that trips me up a little is that when he says the object "disappeared" on him, that doesn't necessarily prove it flew off. Maybe it just turned on some cloaking tech so that he couldn't see it.
Anonymous at Mon, 29 Jul 2024 04:54:20 UTC No. 16301424
Down with the sickness
Anonymous at Mon, 29 Jul 2024 05:23:14 UTC No. 16301445
>>16299060
>>16299627
>decades if not centuries of rigorous math and physics don't match what they detector shows
>yeah, lets toss out literally 10s of thousands of years worth of man hours because the detector that chang designed on his rush to a graduate degree doesn't align with it
lol. lmao even