Image not available

722x8458

O0J.jpg

๐Ÿงต Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16299791

Whats the minimum IQ needed to have foresight and not just live constantly in the present? Has science figured this out yet?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foresight_(psychology)

Image not available

550x563

humanvsnonhuman.gif

Anonymous No. 16299795

A minimum IQ level is a necessary requirement, but is not enough.

Anonymous No. 16299814

>>16299791
I am not sure, the lack of foreskin means your junk is constantly getting rubbed on so you can't really think about the future.

Anonymous No. 16299950

>>16299795
good gif

Anonymous No. 16299970

>>16299795
>humanvsnonhuman
They are both human, incel.

๐Ÿ—‘๏ธ Anonymous No. 16299998

>>16299795
95

Anonymous No. 16300024

>>16299970
the idea that humanity is a single species is a not a scientific idea. humanity was declared to be a single species by the united nations on november 16, 1945 with no input or testimony from scientists and years before dna was even known to exist.
the idea has no basis in science

Anonymous No. 16300031

>>16299791
only familiarity is needed.
not intelligence.
>>16299795
iq is only needd to communicate your foresight, not intuit it.

memory is more important

Anonymous No. 16300145

>>16300024
Source?

Image not available

436x497

sourcejak.png

Anonymous No. 16300809

>>16300145

Anonymous No. 16301961

>>16300145
The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) was born on 16 November 1945. UNESCO has 195 Members and 8 Associate Members and is governed by the General Conference and the Executive Board.
Member nations are required to abide by UNESCO guidelines on scientific questions.

Anonymous No. 16302917

>>16300809
Kek, so that's a no the source, incel?

Anonymous No. 16302925

>>16300024
any working definition of species defines humans as one species.
The modern biological definition which states that a species will chose to mate with members of its own species when not pressed for options includes all races of human under one species.

Anonymous No. 16303199

I read the entire post and he is a retard. He chooses to stay liberal but can't see how that is a problem when democrats allow for the welfare system to exist which enables the kind of crimes that he is able to represent. It's therefore easier to solely blame all this on blacks and justify him staying in his line of work because he is the liberal hero who will finally save them from themselves.

Image not available

949x9999

1705014462657309.png

Anonymous No. 16303265

Anonymous No. 16303458

>>16299791
could be other equally genetically linked factors

Anonymous No. 16303867

>>16299791
Idk but the hot retards living in the moment are the real winners

Anonymous No. 16303895

>>16299795
>w*man
>math
>science
>wisdom

Anonymous No. 16305142

>>16303895
you're misreading the meaning of that image

Anonymous No. 16306042

>>16303895
>schoolgirl
>school teacher
It's not the academic olympics/olympiads

Image not available

577x433

muh savior complex.jpg

Anonymous No. 16307508

>>16303199
Thats all part of the liberal's narcissistic savior complex, they see themselves as gods who own the planet and everything on it

Anonymous No. 16307545

>>16299791
Being smart means your rhythm is off, and it's no fun/too much work to be fake enough to go with the flow. That would suck the joy of life even more than accepting your fate

Anonymous No. 16307639

>>16303265
Fascinating. My attempt to divide, shatter, and ultimately deactivate the conscious mind resulted in similar outcomes. Mind you the machinery is still there and active, it just doesn't have a "Default" dominance. I noticed similar defects, especially around time and empathy related to other people's perspectives. I'm aware of their perspective, I just break that information apart and redirect it into another compartment I am "blind" to and hence lack direct access or contamination from. And the result is as described. Expecting others to not react to things I know violate their expectations or norms.

So, by reductive means, I created a system that can simulate black (ie infantile, practically preverbal) consciousness. Atemporarily, lack of self, and all.

Anonymous No. 16308991

>>16303265
Supposedly, the ability for abstract thinking is something we got from the Neanderthals. That could explain a lot.

Anonymous No. 16308992

>>16302925
>any working definition of species defines humans as one species.
Because the UN made it illegal to think otherwise

Anonymous No. 16309994

>>16307508
Ernest Jones, in 1913, was the first to construe extreme narcissism, which he called the "God-complex", as a character flaw. He described people with God-complex as being aloof, self-important, overconfident, auto-erotic, inaccessible, self-admiring, and exhibitionistic, with fantasies of omnipotence and omniscience. He observed that these people had a high need for uniqueness.

Anonymous No. 16309998

>>16308992
How do you define species

Anonymous No. 16311560

>>16309998
Bonobos and chimpanzees are identified as two distinct species, Africans and Europeans have a lower percentage of common DNA than bonobos and chimpanzees do

Anonymous No. 16311627

>>16311560
Ok, I'm asking how you define species.

Anonymous No. 16313000

>>16311560
>Bonobos and chimpanzees are identified as two distinct species, Africans and Europeans have a lower percentage of common DNA than bonobos and chimpanzees do
hooded crows and carrion crows have even more common dna than bonobos and chimps and science considers hooded crows and carrion crows to be two different species

Anonymous No. 16314202

>>16311560
What percentage for each pairing? To prove you're not just redditor repeating modern myths.

Anonymous No. 16314203

>>16299791
That none of these fuckups can answer such a simple question proves sci is <120 IQ.

Anonymous No. 16315553

>>16314203
the average IQ on /sci/ is the same as everywhere else, 100

Anonymous No. 16315565

>>16315553
this being 4chan it's likely a bit under, we're legit the IFLScience gays who got Cs in college physics

Anonymous No. 16315566

>>16315565
(assuming we went to college)

Image not available

1200x628

07182022_part01_09.jpg

Anonymous No. 16316369

>>16315566
>assuming college is for smart people
it isn't, its vocational training for dimwits. even downies get college degrees these days

Anonymous No. 16316837

>>16316369
That's why failing to go is so bad & college degree is the bare minimum for professional jobs, sure you could become a self employed millionaire but how many of those are on 4chan? This is a forum for people bitter and resentful of life itself.

Anonymous No. 16316966

>>16302925
Wolf, dogs and coyotes are able to breed viable offspring and do in the wild, yet we do not consider them the same species.

In fact a dog is a lot closer to a wolf or coyote than an European man is to a nigger, yet they still want us to believe we are the same species.

Anonymous No. 16317059

>>16316966
Wolves, dogs, and coyotes don't actually select each other in the wild much, unless pressured to either by lack of preferred mates or by humans doing manual fertilization.
I'm sorry to say, but if your dog got lost in the woods it didn't become king of wolves, it became food.

Anonymous No. 16317087

>>16317059
Same for humans, if it wasn't for jews we'd almost not cross breed at all.

Also, dogs will fuck anything that moves so you are kinda saying bs.

Anyway, attraction is irrelevant, a bottle of beer is not a beetle because a beetle is more attracted to it than another actual beetle.

Anonymous No. 16317104

>>16317087
>attraction is irrelevant
My point exactly, it matters if they try and successfully breed with eachother.
A wolf would eat a dog before breeding with it, unless options are starved more than the wolf is.

Anonymous No. 16317243

>>16317104
That's simply not true.
And even if it was, it is irrelevant, attraction is irrelevant.

By the same line of logic i could say that i'd kill a nigger before trying to breed with it, that's just a moronic arguments because you are out of things to say.

Anonymous No. 16317876

>>16317243
>attraction is irrelevant
My point exactly, yet you go on in the very next line to talk about how you're not attracted to other people.
So?
Define species.

Anonymous No. 16319005

>>16316837
>I hate 4chan
>everyone on 4chan is such a total loser
why are you here?

Anonymous No. 16319007

>>16299795
>Phrenology
Oh man, more idiots!

Anonymous No. 16319801

>>16299791
>hurrr what quantity confers this quality????
You don't have it.

Image not available

602x194

skulls of differe....jpg

Anonymous No. 16320714

>>16319007
>evolution is totally real
>except in humans above the neck
wrong

Anonymous No. 16322173

>>16319005
Because I'm a total loser with a diagnosed low IQ, duh

Anonymous No. 16324006

>>16322173
if you really were that you would not have the self awareness to realize it. everyone thinks they're smart, even stupid people.

Anonymous No. 16324012

>>16324006
I mean I literally have a sub 90 IQ, idk what to say. Lots of 4chan neets likely do and my material conditions make my status obvious to me

Anonymous No. 16324154

>>16319007
Err, retard, your genes create your phenotype. And your intelligence is determined by your genes.

Image not available

1309x1301

vegan diet causes....jpg

Anonymous No. 16325688

>>16324154
Thats not entirely the case, environmental conditions also contribute to the final product. Someone could be born with high IQ genes, but be raised vegan and end up very low IQ

Image not available

1180x504

Screenshot 2024-0....png

Anonymous No. 16326541

>>16299795
aren't black people known for their huge foreheads?

Anonymous No. 16328274

>>16326541
bulbhead has more to do what baldness and a narrow neck

Anonymous No. 16328385

>>16326541
More of a Somali stereotype

Grey No. 16328423

>>16299791
You're better off looking at the regional anatomy and function... The ventromedial prefrontal cortex might be worth looking into but honestly there's no real answer to what you've asked beyond slapping textbooks on your desk

Also, Iq is an overbloated maths and logic test; it honestly doesn't determine fuck all other than what you've learnt and whether youre shit at recognising patterns...
Professor feinman only has an iq of 125 and I've met people with iqs in excess of 160 who've done fuck all with their lives... Emotional regulation and processing is also a key part of functional intelligence

Grey No. 16328431

>>16324154
>>16324154
Lols... Genotype is someone's genes alone; phenotype is also influenced by gene expression, signalling and environment... Eg. Someone with AIS would have an xy male karyotype due to their genes but a predominantly female phenotype and sexual anatomy

Grey No. 16328435

>>16326541
Africa has more genetic diversity than Europe and Asia combined so that's not a particularly reasonable belief

Anonymous No. 16328558

>>16328423
honestly he does not sound like a 125IQ doctor/lawyer level person just from his biography. he must have been a prodigy of some sort on top of his respectable general intelligence

Anonymous No. 16330040

>>16328385
since when are lightbulbs brown tho

Anonymous No. 16330105

>>16328423
>Also, Iq is an overbloated maths and logic test; it honestly doesn't determine fuck all other than what you've learnt and whether youre shit at recognising patterns...
shut the fuck up you retarded faggot

>Professor feinman only has an iq of 125
lmao imagine thinking a wildly scaling child test defines someone who was an all around genius whose effective iq was around 150.

Anonymous No. 16331251

>>16299791
Given the squirrels and woodpeckers are smart enough to stash food for winter while Africans never developed that habit, its safe to say that squirrels are smarter than negroes

Anonymous No. 16333188

>>16330105
Feignmann wasn't smart, thats just a lame rumor the jewish dominated media circulates. If he were of legitimate intelligence he would have been able to develop something useful in his long career, instead all he was able to come up with was ridiculous trash like string theory

Anonymous No. 16333317

>>16299791
>Most people who see this message have done nothing wrong. Some kinds of blocks restrict editing from specific service providers or telecom companies in response to recent abuse or vandalism, and can sometimes affect other users who are unrelated to that abuse. Review the information below for assistance if you do not believe that you have done anything wrong.
Wikipedia run by clueless faggot?