🗑️ 🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Sun, 28 Jul 2024 07:09:24 UTC No. 16300035
Hello /sci/ggers tourist here wanting to know what you guys think of the schizo negro, is he unto something? I wouldn't believe him until they sent a Jew to try and neutralize him.
Anonymous at Sun, 28 Jul 2024 07:28:24 UTC No. 16300047
both these podcasts were such a waste of time
Anonymous at Sun, 28 Jul 2024 08:24:31 UTC No. 16300088
A k***, a m***** and a n***** sit down to debate "soience".
As expected OP slurps it up.
*** ook
**** oron
***** innie
Anonymous at Sun, 28 Jul 2024 08:37:18 UTC No. 16300102
>>16300035
>TND
>TJD (Eric Weinstein is fucking crank too)
That is all
Anonymous at Sun, 28 Jul 2024 08:57:02 UTC No. 16300118
>>16300035
Predict or bust.
If his schizo models can beat conventional models at predictions then he's king.
If not he need meds.
Anonymous at Sun, 28 Jul 2024 10:02:05 UTC No. 16300178
>>16300035
He's a delusional schizo.
Anonymous at Sun, 28 Jul 2024 11:46:35 UTC No. 16300241
>>16300035
Watch black science guy's video on it where he debunks the entire thing.
Yeah, I know, he's mostly a popsci advocate, but that makes the schizo look even worse, because his debunking is logically sound.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=1uLi1I3
Remember, all of science is merely an abstract tool used to explain the phenomenons found in our reality. If something cannot be used as a tool, chances are that it is not scientific of nature.
When you encounter someone claiming something that you do not understand, there is a very easy method of knowing whether he speaks the truth or is merely schizobabbling: look at the effects his claims have had.
Were any of his claims used to replace an existing part of our current understanding of reality (can it be used to calculate something useful)?
Werr any of his claims validated by a third (unrelated) party?
Was the guy murdered after releasing his revelations?
If you cannot answer any of these questions with "yes", then no matter how truthful the claims may seem, the chance that it has no value whatsoever is extremely high.
B00T at Sun, 28 Jul 2024 11:50:47 UTC No. 16300245
>>16300241
Stop posting this fag nonsense.
Anonymous at Sun, 28 Jul 2024 12:05:17 UTC No. 16300261
>>16300245
I don't know why I'm responding to a schizophrenic namefag, but feel free to actually point to whatever you think is nonsense instead of going
>HURR U STUPID DURR