🧵 inb4 the horse meme
Anonymous at Mon, 29 Jul 2024 04:41:20 UTC No. 16301406
How come doctors don't use ivermectin to treat cancer if it works?
Is it because the more expensive treatments which don't work as well turn larger profits for the doctors?
Cult of Passion at Mon, 29 Jul 2024 04:47:20 UTC No. 16301418
Ask the insurance companies or lawmakers, theyre in control of that kind of stuff.
*cough*Ivermectin*cough*
Anonymous at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 02:05:45 UTC No. 16302702
>>16301406
doctors are in business to make money for themselves, not to help their clients.
Anonymous at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 15:00:33 UTC No. 16303352
>>16301406
Fasting from food and only drinking water has been proven to remove tumors in some cases, even a case where a woman was told she had "terminal" and "lemon-sized" tumors. She asked her doc about fasting and the doc said "there are a lot of quacks and criminals out there", so she went to one such "quack" and her tumors disappeared. I've seen the x-rays, before and after, but the video was removed from JewTube.
Chemo doctors get a ton of money for slowly killing people, then they write the death certificate and blame cancer for the murder. There's also IV vitamin C with good reports.
Anonymous at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 15:15:57 UTC No. 16303365
>>16303352
She went to a quack to learn how to fast? Seems pretty straightforward.
Anonymous at Wed, 31 Jul 2024 06:20:36 UTC No. 16304279
>>16301406
the patent on ivermectin expired 20 years ago so its no longer profitable
Anonymous at Wed, 31 Jul 2024 07:36:16 UTC No. 16304391
>>16301406
Now ask yourself the question: how many doctors with access to Ivermectin dies of cancer compared to the overall population?
Next do the same calculation for politicians. Ten publish, lean back, and watch news explode.
Anonymous at Fri, 2 Aug 2024 05:01:18 UTC No. 16306610
>>16305268
its like i'm really on mintboard
Anonymous at Fri, 2 Aug 2024 05:09:01 UTC No. 16306626
>>16301406
The FDA said...
> neigh.
Anonymous at Sat, 3 Aug 2024 05:31:50 UTC No. 16308136
>>16303352
>the doc said "there are a lot of quacks and criminals out there"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psych
Anonymous at Sun, 4 Aug 2024 03:30:49 UTC No. 16309330
>>16301406
cool it with the anti semitism
Anonymous at Mon, 5 Aug 2024 03:40:37 UTC No. 16310531
How come doctors aren't allow to suggest cancer treatments that work?
Anonymous at Tue, 6 Aug 2024 06:33:38 UTC No. 16311873
>>16310531
medicine is just another industry trying to maximize profits while lying through their teeth pretending what they do is altruistic and beneficial
Anonymous at Wed, 7 Aug 2024 03:44:50 UTC No. 16312988
>>16311873
How come nobody is proud of wanting to make money? I thought we lived in a capitalist society. Shouldn't trying to make money be considered a good thing?
Anonymous at Thu, 8 Aug 2024 04:36:28 UTC No. 16314572
>>16312988
>I thought we lived in a capitalist society.
wrong, we live in a communist totalitarian state masquerading as a free capitalist society. nobody in charge of a communist totalitarian state is ever going to admit what they really are, of course they'll lie and pretend to be some superior ideal.
Anonymous at Fri, 9 Aug 2024 04:45:01 UTC No. 16316282
>>16312988
when other people make money its because they're greedy and evil cheaters, when i make money its because i'm smart and hard working
Anonymous at Fri, 9 Aug 2024 13:58:22 UTC No. 16316842
Please, God, let the conservatives ignore their doctor and treat their cancer with dewormer. That's just natural selection at work.
>>16306626
Underrated post.
Anonymous at Fri, 9 Aug 2024 22:59:22 UTC No. 16317765
>>16316282
That is exactly what resentful losers and poorfags genuinely believe
Anonymous at Sat, 10 Aug 2024 19:25:14 UTC No. 16318998
>>16305268
still not as bad as the dog meme
Anonymous at Sat, 10 Aug 2024 19:36:27 UTC No. 16319015
>>16304391
Rich and famous people die from cancer all the time, retard. Steve Jobs was a billionaire and famously rejected standard cancer treatments for quit a while before finally giving in after alternative approaches had no effect.
>Barrie R. Cassileth, the chief of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center's integrative medicine department said, "Jobs's faith in alternative medicine likely cost him his life ... He had the only kind of pancreatic cancer that is treatable and curable ... He essentially committed suicide."
>According to biographer Walter Isaacson, "for nine months he refused to undergo surgery for his pancreatic cancer – a decision he later regretted as his health declined. Instead, he tried a vegan diet, acupuncture, herbal remedies, and other treatments he found online, and even consulted a psychic. He was also influenced by a doctor who ran a clinic that advised juice fasts, bowel cleansings and other unproven approaches, before finally having surgery in July 2004."
Cancer is scary and it's comforting to think that you have some secret weapon that will instantly cure you if you ever get cancer but that's really not how it works. Yes pharmaceutical companies want you sick forever and are just out to get a profit but if curing cancer were as simple as
>fast and take ivermectin
then they wouldn't be able to keep people from learning about it.
Anonymous at Sun, 11 Aug 2024 04:46:43 UTC No. 16319516
>>16305268
the horse meme is all over the place these days, its like ylilauta a decade ago or something
Anonymous at Sun, 11 Aug 2024 21:40:40 UTC No. 16320580
Why do the IFLS people hate Ivermectin so much? Its one of medical science's great recent inventions. Are there any other medications which have been invented subsequent to the creation of antibiotics that are more useful than Ivermectin and it's derivatives?
Anonymous at Mon, 12 Aug 2024 18:53:18 UTC No. 16321852
>>16320580
>Are there any other medications which have been invented subsequent to the creation of antibiotics that are more useful than Ivermectin and it's derivatives?
no
Anonymous at Tue, 13 Aug 2024 20:24:48 UTC No. 16323991
Ivermectin is old af, how come nobody noticed it's value in treating cancer for so long? There has been trillions spent on cancer research over the past half century and still nobody receiving those funds were able to figure this out? What did they do with all that money, did they just waste it all padding their CVs with replication crisis papers or something?
Anonymous at Wed, 14 Aug 2024 05:22:47 UTC No. 16324655
>>16323991
Ivermectin is inexpensive, thats why the cancer researchers shun it
Anonymous at Wed, 14 Aug 2024 06:25:25 UTC No. 16324722
>>16316842
Somalians murdering and raping is leftist natural selection. Please let them continue ignoring common sense, it's only right.
Anonymous at Wed, 14 Aug 2024 06:37:07 UTC No. 16324737
>>16324655
surely at some point soneone with cancer would've gotten some worms and been prescribed magic ivermectin.
This, if the claim was true, would've resulted in a drastic improvement of the patient's condition, which in turn would've led to further investigation.
>thats why the cancer researchers shun it
Researchers just want some neat publications, that's it. That's their entire goal. "Ivermectin (and derivatives) cures cancer" is an easy slam dunk if it really works. But it doesn't, which is why there's no literature.
Anonymous at Thu, 15 Aug 2024 04:13:57 UTC No. 16326299
>>16324737
>these drug researchers only care about publications, they're not hoping to get rich selling some new patented medications
Anonymous at Thu, 15 Aug 2024 07:50:17 UTC No. 16326557
>>16326299
Yes?
Even if your name is on the patent the one making the big money is the corporation, not you. It's a prerequisite to give up most patent-holder rights to work in pharma research.
You make no insane money off a new drug directly (you get a ome-time bonus, but that won't make you rich), but you do indirectly make money off reputation, which you get through publishing.
Anonymous at Fri, 16 Aug 2024 00:59:32 UTC No. 16328296
>>16326557
>I made up this idiotic delusion solely for the sake of trying to win an argument on 4chan
Anonymous at Fri, 16 Aug 2024 06:50:23 UTC No. 16328628
>>16328296
Anon, that's how it works. To do pharma research you have to forfeit your patent rights.
Anonymous at Sat, 17 Aug 2024 07:41:29 UTC No. 16330042
>>16301406
doctors don't treat cancer, they give out false positives and then give the victims of the false positive cancer diagnosis carcinogenic drugs which then cause real cancer and the real cancer then justifies the initial false positive
Anonymous at Sat, 17 Aug 2024 07:43:36 UTC No. 16330043
>>16301406
>inb4 the horse meme
what about vaush? goblins ain't science, OP!
Anonymous at Sat, 17 Aug 2024 07:47:09 UTC No. 16330046
>>16328628
>To do pharma research you have to forfeit your patent rights.
There's no point in arguing with people on the internet. They don't know it any better.
If you're doing pharmaceutical research and you don't come up with the data that the corporations want to see, you run the risk of being labelled "a difficult case" because your research uses up money that results in nothing that could be monetized on. No enterprise wants that.
So, if you want to chase that sweet research career (which quite some many people want as the number of PhDs keeps on rising and rising with no good reason why they should rise), you are strongly incentivized to fake data or set up studies in a way where you can't come up with either true- or false-negatives.
It's a little dirty game that people play with each other. The industry pretends that for-profit research is ethically sound and, in exchange, rewards researchers with contracts, the researchers remain silent about their fraudulent practices in exchange for a promise that their research career doesn't end here.
Anonymous at Sat, 17 Aug 2024 08:48:34 UTC No. 16330083
>>16330046
>If you're doing pharmaceutical research and you don't come up with the data that the corporations want to see, you run the risk of being labelled "a difficult case" because your research uses up money that results in nothing that could be monetized on.
If "thing doesn't work" then "thing doesn't work". Projects die all the time, even in clinical/preclinical trial stages, because things don't work. This stuff is hard, after all.
Failure is part of the game.
>you are strongly incentivized to fake data or set up studies in a way where you can't come up with either true- or false-negatives.
Pharma has extremely stringent controls so that does not happen. They really, really do NOT want you to do that, because it leads to more time and money being wasted. If it doesn't work, then it doesn't work.
After all, this is industry and not academia. There are consequences to publishing garbage here.
Everyone in the business knows how this works and ALL of this is priced in.
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 06:06:32 UTC No. 16331249
>>16330083
>Projects die all the time, even in clinical/preclinical trial stages, because things don't work.
And careers die with those projects. If you're working for Pharma Inc. and you turn up data which says that the drug they've invested money in doesn't work then your ass is on the street and nobody else in the industry will hire you.
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 08:40:39 UTC No. 16331346
>>16331249
>And careers die with those projects
No, they don't. Because it IS part of the game. Everyone knows this.
I don't think you know how pharmaceutical research works. Which is understandable because it's complicated and difficult.
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 08:49:21 UTC No. 16331349
>>16301406
Individual doctors dont decide treatments, they go with whats professionnally acceptable. Idk who decides which treatments doctors are allowed to administer; I assume its someone highly corrupt
Anonymous at Sun, 18 Aug 2024 10:16:33 UTC No. 16331401
>>16301406
>inb4 the horse meme
what about raven and beasboy? I don't get it.
Anonymous at Mon, 19 Aug 2024 19:39:42 UTC No. 16333325
>>16331401
>he doesn't know about the horse meme
ask tim walz lol