Anonymous at Mon, 29 Jul 2024 05:12:17 UTC No. 16301434

>wants to stand up to government and corporations
>targets a guy who runs a computer repair store

Anonymous at Mon, 29 Jul 2024 05:12:42 UTC No. 16301435

You can respond by telling them that no machine, no matter how advanced, will never be 100% accurate. There is always a margin of error that humans will need to correct. For example, NASA back when the first computers rolled around used human computers such as Katherine Johnson to check their results were accurate!

Anonymous at Mon, 29 Jul 2024 05:37:41 UTC No. 16301458

>>16301432
>sounding mad
who cares just be mad and punch the glow nigger.

Anonymous at Mon, 29 Jul 2024 07:35:57 UTC No. 16301513

>>16301432
I can't. This shit is ALREADY happening.
That said, you still need to know the basics to know what to ask for the AI.

Cult of Passion at Mon, 29 Jul 2024 08:04:52 UTC No. 16301525

>>16301432
Just say "luddite", no punctuation or preface, just a sticky note with that one word.

Anonymous at Mon, 29 Jul 2024 08:26:14 UTC No. 16301530

>>16301432
>how do you respond to this
You don't. Let it go.

Cult of Passion at Mon, 29 Jul 2024 08:36:34 UTC No. 16301540

>>16301530
>Let it go.
I dont think you understand how close to 'fighting words' you are right now.

Anonymous at Mon, 29 Jul 2024 09:28:17 UTC No. 16301576

>>16301432
That AI isn't being used to solve problems with high specificity and it consumes massive amounts resources even with what its currently capable of?

Anonymous at Mon, 29 Jul 2024 10:26:59 UTC No. 16301623

>>16301435
Why do humans need to be the ones correcting the errors? Humans also have a margin of error. Why couldn't you have error checking done by other computers?

Anonymous at Mon, 29 Jul 2024 10:37:38 UTC No. 16301631

>>16301525
i agree with you for once

Anonymous at Mon, 29 Jul 2024 11:49:43 UTC No. 16301686

>>16301525
And what do you do when you get a mail the next day?
>>16301458
He's not a glownigger.

Anonymous at Mon, 29 Jul 2024 12:04:45 UTC No. 16301703

>>16301432
What kind of subhuman writes across the margin like that?

Anonymous at Mon, 29 Jul 2024 12:09:15 UTC No. 16301710

>>16301703
Do not speak ill of uncle Ted.

Anonymous at Mon, 29 Jul 2024 13:08:37 UTC No. 16301759

>>16301540
The only thing you fight with are the other voices in your head.

Anonymous at Mon, 29 Jul 2024 13:45:39 UTC No. 16301796

>>16301432
The very fact that he used technology (paper, ink, etc.) to write that letter refutes his argument that technology is bad. As expected, criminals are too stupid to see the contradictions in their actions, even if they were prodigial mathematicians once.

Anonymous at Mon, 29 Jul 2024 13:48:44 UTC No. 16301805

>>16301796
>modern technology is the worst thing to happen
>industrialization is bad
>HURR DURR HE USED PAPER DOE HURR

Anonymous at Mon, 29 Jul 2024 13:50:07 UTC No. 16301807

>>16301805
I see you seething but I see no counterargument.

Anonymous at Mon, 29 Jul 2024 14:52:36 UTC No. 16301873

>>16301807
Ted was in prison when he wrote this I don't think he had a choice with what he wrote with and wrote on, he probably thought he might as well respond to these good-natured letters before he dies. Not that you would value a single nice thing in life with how clearly you glossed over the letter to nitpick incorrectly as soon as humanly possible.

Sincerely yours,
anon

Anonymous at Mon, 29 Jul 2024 15:13:59 UTC No. 16301896

>>16301432
That is enough evidence to chain-saw that fucker in half. Simple as.

Anonymous at Mon, 29 Jul 2024 15:49:25 UTC No. 16301923

>>16301623
How do you make sure the error checker has no errors?

Frin at Mon, 29 Jul 2024 20:09:06 UTC No. 16302340

>>16301432
Seems legit. 360 no scope out the door.

Anonymous at Mon, 29 Jul 2024 20:53:38 UTC No. 16302407

>>16301923
This is true whether the error checker is a human or an AI. If an AI error checker has a lower error rate than a human error checker, it will replace the human.

Anonymous at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 01:02:09 UTC No. 16302648

>haha you died of cancer and the only thing you're known for is bombs, your math theorem sucked ass.

Anonymous at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 03:45:16 UTC No. 16302804

>>16301686
he is and you are too.

Cult of Passion at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 03:55:24 UTC No. 16302810

>>16301631
>for once
>I reject science and logic but you won me over on an emotional topic.
Your feelings have betrayed you...
>>16301759
>The only thing you fight
At least I dont fight the Truth. Every topic related to Kaczynski's manifesto I know better than him, humans, technology, MATHEMATICS, you name it....Bomb Making. All Of It.

Huemans and their vanity on full display for their own selves, insane, delusional, sad.

Anonymous at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 05:36:44 UTC No. 16302849

>he writes over the margin lines
He was literally insane, this should have gotten his charges dropped on insanity. If his lawyers saw this, he'd have served 0 years.

Cult of Passion at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 05:54:09 UTC No. 16302862

>>16302849
Renegades gunna rene.

Peak performance is peak, just not for ewe.

Anonymous at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 12:54:19 UTC No. 16303184

>>16301432
Well, he was wrong, mathematics resists replacement by AI surprisingly well so far.

Anonymous at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 17:14:35 UTC No. 16303435

>>16303184
This. The only thing AI has been good for so far is shitposting and maybe porn depending on taste.

Anonymous at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 18:23:44 UTC No. 16303495

Ted has a lot of good points but he's not literally god and was still human. Not every take he had was based or should be set in stone.

Also, he entered the academic market in the late 70s where you probably didn't even need a post-doc to be hired as an assistant professor. Had he chosen to stay at Berkely holding constant not dying of cancer he'd be a full tenure professor today and could still be doing research mathematics right now.

Anonymous at Wed, 31 Jul 2024 12:18:21 UTC No. 16304539

>>16302810
sucka cock loser :DD