Image not available

645x347

women are like as....png

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16301755

Asians are like women?

Anonymous No. 16301763

>>16301755
have you seen asian "men"?

Anonymous No. 16301767

>>16301755
If true, this might imply it has something to do with testosterone levels, which would suggest we may see a similar reduction of the variance in the European and African populations as they also experience declining testosterone.

Anonymous No. 16301779

>>16301755
Asians are effeminate. They killed off the masculine ones in history

Image not available

576x1024

1682639183139695.webm

Anonymous No. 16301780

>>16301763

Anonymous No. 16301782

>>16301779
Mongols were pretty masculine. It’s the E. Asian types that are a race of women.

🗑️ Anonymous No. 16301790

Asians are smarter than white “people” cope

>>16281592

Anonymous No. 16301792

>>16301790
ok mr ching chong

Anonymous No. 16301797

i have actually spent many many years researching what explains this.

there is just 1 MRI study from 2010 which shows that northwest europeans have a more wrinkly frontal cortex in areas of the brain which are implicated in verbal intelligence and processing speed

in addition, there are many genes implicated in higher IQ, which are only present in caucasian populations. For instance, CCR5 -delta32 is only present in caucasians, and it seems to boost recovery from neurological damage, for instance, strokes.

another gene COMT met-met which boosts working memory is highest in caucasian populations and is particularly high in Scandinavia.

so while east Asians may be slightly more intelligent on average this is primarily in math-related aspects of intelligence and this is only a higher average IQ

Anonymous No. 16301818

There's tons of retards in East Asia but they keep them locked up in the countryside and don't let them take IQ tests.

Image not available

750x686

o9n4asgmysa91.jpg

Anonymous No. 16301844

>>16301755
Not only this graph is completely fake, but in fact asians are more variable in iq than whites

Image not available

602x361

main-qimg-b34c283....jpg

Anonymous No. 16301850

>>16301767
>>16301779
Asian iq is more Variable than White

Anonymous No. 16301858

>>16301755
They sit down and do so much math that they max out their potential. Doesn't mean much in the end

Anonymous No. 16301859

>>16301755
This graphic is from the site with no original study link

total chink death No. 16301916

>>16301844
>>16301850
could you post this image once more?

Anonymous No. 16301940

>>16301844
>>16301850
Where is this from, if not your ass?

Anonymous No. 16301968

E. Asians are more consistent than the white man, which is why they’re generally “better” at infrastructure.

I repeat, “better”.

>>16301844
Not too unbelievable given that the white man has dropped like 15~ IQ points from the last century alone.

The age of white brilliance, is over.

Anonymous No. 16302046

>>16301968
>given that the white man has dropped like 15~ IQ points from the last century alone
Proof?

Anonymous No. 16302062

>>16302046
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flynn_effect
>Jon Martin Sundet and colleagues (2004) examined scores on intelligence tests given to Norwegian conscripts between the 1950s and 2002. They found that the increase of scores of general intelligence stopped after the mid-1990s and declined in numerical reasoning sub-tests.[52]

Teasdale and Owen (2005) examined the results of IQ tests given to Danish male conscripts. Between 1959 and 1979 the gains were 3 points per decade. Between 1979 and 1989 the increase approached 2 IQ points. Between 1989 and 1998 the gain was about 1.3 points. Between 1998 and 2004 IQ declined by about the same amount as it gained between 1989 and 1998. They speculate that "a contributing factor in this recent fall could be a simultaneous decline in proportions of students entering 3-year advanced-level school programs for 16–18-year-olds."[68] The same authors in a more comprehensive 2008 study, again on Danish male conscripts, found that there was a 1.5-point increase between 1988 and 1998, but a 1.5-point decrease between 1998 and 2003/2004.[69]

In Australia, the IQ of 6–12-year-olds (as measured by colored progressive matrices) has shown no increase from 1975 to 2003.[70]
>Bratsberg & Rogeberg (2018) present evidence that the Flynn effect in Norway has reversed between the years 1962-1991, and that both the original rise in mean IQ scores and their subsequent decline within this period can be observed within families consisting of native-born parents and their children, indicating that environmental factors were the likely cause for these changes. Because IQ data was only available for male Norwegians, who were subject to military conscription, years of schooling were used as an approximation for female IQ to support this conclusion

Anonymous No. 16302074

>>16301940
Your stupidity
https://www.nature.com/articles/6800418

Image not available

1080x1556

1712362748622621.jpg

Anonymous No. 16302469

>>16302046
Modern day people:

— ‘College students once stood out from the pack on IQ tests. Today, they're about average. A recent meta-analysis found that undergraduates' IQs have steadily fallen from roughly 119 in 1939 to a mean of 102 in 2022, just slightly above the population average of 100.’

Victorians as they were:

— ‘The Victorian era was marked by an explosion of innovation and genius, per capita rates of which appear to have declined subsequently. The presence of dysgenic fertility for IQ amongst Western nations, starting in the 19th century, suggests that these trends might be related to declining IQ. This is because high-IQ people are more productive and more creative. We tested the hypothesis that the Victorians were cleverer than modern populations, using high-quality instruments, namely measures of simple visual reaction time in a meta-analytic study. Simple reaction time measures correlate substantially with measures of general intelligence (g) and are considered elementary measures of cognition. In this study we used the data on the secular slowing of simple reaction time described in a meta-analysis of 14 age-matched studies from Western countries conducted between 1889 and 2004 to estimate the decline in g that may have resulted from the presence of dysgenic fertility. Using psychometric meta-analysis we computed the true correlation between simple reaction time and g, yielding a decline of − 1.16 IQ points per decade or − 13.35 IQ points since Victorian times. These findings strongly indicate that with respect to g the Victorians were substantially cleverer than modern Western populations.’

Anonymous No. 16303208

>>16301755
Asians lack body hair, or smell. They are more woman than man. Fight like women too.

Anonymous No. 16304591

>>16301755
yes

Anonymous No. 16304625

>>16301844
>>16301850
interesting, please provide more
I think it seems clear white IQ is declining, but it would be unusual and very unexpected for Asians to both not be experiencing similar decline + have a higher variance. If this were taken from a combination of rural (i.e. nutritionally deficient) and urban areas in esp. China that could explain it, otherwise it would be nice to know more
>>16302074
>https://www.nature.com/articles/6800418
Maybe it's just my browser but no graph renders in this link for me.

Anonymous No. 16305770

>>16301755
yes 100%

Anonymous No. 16305858

>>16301767
Asian females have the lowest estrogen of all races.

Anonymous No. 16307060

>>16304625
It refers to articles with this. But it's under paywall. You could try to check out on pirate heaven like scihub, but it seems tge information is kinda valid

Anonymous No. 16307068

>>16301755
Real data don't have bell's normal distrubution, I'm sorry you haven't passed the test of fact-checking your data.

Anonymous No. 16307088

>>16307068
I fact checked this data and it's 100% fake but faggots still will believe

Anonymous No. 16307096

>>16305858
Doesn't estrogen cause brain shrinkage in males?

Anonymous No. 16307119

>>16301844
>>16301850
If white iq is truly more variable, it is likely something that cannot truly be assessed, as there are pockets of genius you would have to single out, like the Ashkenazi, who are pound for pound the most brilliant (highest iq) group on the planet, and ‘How to be successful like a Jew’ is (still) a bestseller in China.

But also what >>16301968 said, since it is always shocking how *fast* a populace can change, for the worse. Victorians are (or were) apparently comparable to the Ashkenazi.

Anonymous No. 16307237

>>16301755
Sure is a lot of DEI and beta white cope ITT.
It was a mistake to be manipulated and lied to by some degenerates who have to worry about sexual deviancy, and devolved their family as well as man-woman dynamics. To take advantage in that way, well.
Chicoms still have to be stopped, but at least they are easier to handle now. That has become a distraction from dealing with seething lying brown niggers now.
Should there be an Asian-Brown/Black race war?

Image not available

602x277

main-qimg-51279a8....png

Anonymous No. 16307246

>>16307119
Information for asheke nazi jews. And no, general population always was retarded, especially in Victorian era. IQ raised only for last 100 years, people were more retarded in Victorian era in terms of iq

Anonymous No. 16308555

>>16301755
Apparently so

Anonymous No. 16308557

>>16307246
>people were more retarded in Victorian era in terms of iq
Nope. See >>16302469

Anonymous No. 16308697

>>16308557
>No actual iq tests
>There were more inventions therefore they we muh smarter, not because there was more ground to invent after medieval ages

Anonymous No. 16309713

>>16308697
>reaction times have nothing to do with iq
Is this cope

Anonymous No. 16309867

>>16309713
>reaction times have anything to do with iq

Anonymous No. 16310836

>>16309867
Why yes they do ;)

Anonymous No. 16311113

>>16309713
yes, yes it is but I prefer the data on hue discernment

Anonymous No. 16311390

>>16302469
>‘College students once stood out from the pack on IQ tests. Today, they're about average. A recent meta-analysis found that undergraduates' IQs have steadily fallen from roughly 119 in 1939 to a mean of 102 in 2022, just slightly above the population average of 100.’
This doesn't make any claims about the general population, it just states that once colleges only accepted exceptional applicants and now they mainly accept average people.

Anonymous No. 16311433

>>16301844
>>16301755
Sources???

Anonymous No. 16312153

Racist board

Anonymous No. 16312158

>>16301859
Maybe its useless to even ask for sources.

Anonymous No. 16312173

>>16311433
Read the thread midwit
>>16302074

Anonymous No. 16312174

>>16310836
>I made it up therefore it's real

Anonymous No. 16312181

>>16312158
Why? It's a science board. Seems like people who spam this graph are really confident about this. So I still ask op for the source to the study

Image not available

750x1000

bg,f8f8f8-flat,75....jpg

Anonymous No. 16312189

>>16312181
Because it will just result in this. Its a /sci/ board but its on 4chan. These are like white muslims when it comes to s o y ence.

Anonymous No. 16312197

>>16301850
>>16301844
This matches the SAT score ceiling of Asian students. Were Asian SAT score takers have been artificially capped on their tail end of the curve

Anonymous No. 16312255

>>16312197
Test cannot be artificial. Also post me source to study on the op pic

Image not available

768x511

Untitled.png

Anonymous No. 16312261

>>16312255
https://www.amren.com/news/2017/02/race-gaps-sat-scores-highlight-inequality-hinder-upward-mobility/

I drew this. Its not a natural curve. Its an artificial cap. A natural curve would have to either have the asian curve drop into higher points or make the tests harder by ~2 order of magnitude for a proper natural asian curve. The later would mean reducing blacks/hispanic representation a bit. The former would highlight the extreme divide as the asian curve would be on another scale entirely

Image not available

688x399

ceiling.png

Anonymous No. 16312269

>>16312261
https://www.brookings.edu/articles/race-gaps-in-sat-scores-highlight-inequality-and-hinder-upward-mobility/

Original article.

Anonymous No. 16312287

>>16312261
Math SAT is highly dependent on studying math diligently, no? So could be largely cultural.

Anonymous No. 16312290

>>16312287
Oh nice, its all magic fairy dusts.

Anonymous No. 16312304

>>16312261
Maybe because sat math is too easy? I'm from ee country, and got 800 on sat math from the first try. And I met more complex math in my class. So american ed system isn't enough to calculate asian iq lol

Image not available

1322x997

GAny1vXaMAAv4f2.jpg

Anonymous No. 16312312

>>16312304
OECD PISA math scores across the world

There's a huge gap.
>average 9%

>East Asia
>41%
>32%
>29%
>27%
>23%
>23%

>Europe
>16%
>15%
>13%
>12%

>US
>7%

Anonymous No. 16312336

>>16312312
The East Asian data can be skewed higher because they are sampling urban centers and city states with population around 7.5 million. Still, it's obvious from SK and JP data that they outperform others by a significant margin.
What causes this?
>Historically high literacy rates, and state supported educational institutions established and accessible to the general public regardless of their official social standing
>meritocracy, in other words
>in modern times, very competitive educational environment combined with military service required as a rite of passage for men
>higher educational standards and homogenity of the population allowing for social cohesion and sense of unity, security, and strength
>Traditionally well-developed sense of social mores that keeps deviance and criminality to an absolute minimum
There's basically somewhere between half a millenia to a 1,000 year difference in genetic and behavioral development between East Asia and other parts of the world.
The equivalent of this are well-educated native and core demographics of the West, and Slavic-Russian world with comparable level of civilizational sophistication and history. Rest also have their core ingroups, but even their average middle class population is too degenerate to catch up any time soon, especially if both West and the East begin to actively reject competition.
Neither even has to proactively suppress anyone. All anyone has to do is to act normally again.

Anonymous No. 16312338

>>16312336
>east asian countries data fake
>american asian data fake
>math is fake

Yeah I dont buy it. Seething about multiple completely different official data points collected by completely different entities with completely different goals is just schizo tier or worse

Anonymous No. 16312343

>>16312338
I never claimed the data is fake. Read the post again, if you will.

Anonymous No. 16312361

>>16312338
If there would be study about asian boys who are adopted to white families performing better than whites in asian one, he would argue that they fake that too

Image not available

736x574

derangement.png

Anonymous No. 16312366

>>16312361
I think a lot of people got the wrong idea about my thought process. That would explain the really awkward interactions I had with people.
I looked into the minds of wretched third world niggers and came out worse for it. Blame those freaks with daddy issues.

Anonymous No. 16312373

As a side, there are a bunch of blacks in the military, intelligence, and in the federal government who think they hold the moral high ground because of reasonz.
Apparently they think blacks going around poisoning newborn babies and causing miscarriages by hundreds of thousands a year isn't their problem, for one thing.

Anonymous No. 16312395

>>16312304
One thing some of the more dedicated warsaw pact nations did right was pushing for higher educational standards, and getting children used to scholastic competition from an early age.
Our domestic education system is quite literally about catering to midwits to keep blacks and the underclass sated. It began as anti-communist agitation efforts, and spiraled out of control from there to DEI pushers trying to shovel in enemies to our institutions for a socio-economic take over.
We are at war.

Anonymous No. 16312407

If you want to think about how we can raise the educational standards for the core demographic, you can reference academic curriculum from high performing nations. The reason why jews are so competitive is because they have a culturally ingrained norm that values academic, scholastic excellence and spiritual reflection from early age.
By the time you are 12 or 13 year old boys, you should be capable of having amateur debates about basic concepts in different philosophical schools of thought, a good grasp of history, and familiarity with what amounts to senior level high school literature. The arithematic proficiency should be at junior or even senior high school level at the 9th grade level.
Competitive college prep schools and magnet institutions do a good job of this from 8th grade and up, but the process can begin from age 4 or 5.
Basically, our society values watering things down for midwits instead of rewarding and encouraging excellence.

Anonymous No. 16312438

>>16312407
>8th grade level

Anonymous No. 16312570

>>16312173
>>16307060
>well I don't acually have sources but you can try to find it yourself
Ok, got it.

Anonymous No. 16312586

>>16312261
Why is white SAT score distribution looks like a bell curve and asian one doesn't?

Maybe...socio-economic factors...are real? No fucking way.

Anonymous No. 16312590

>>16312586
Or maybe Asian immigration to this country usually selects for the more intelligent, competitive, and generally the uppercrust of their societies.

Anonymous No. 16312594

>>16312586
Irrelevant. The point is that its an artificial cap and there is a natural distribution regardless of if its socio-economic factors or not. Suppose its ultra mega giga rich/super genius club, there is still a curve distribution. The fact that we dont see that is an indication of artificial ceiling.

Anonymous No. 16312600

>>16312590
I thought it also counts as "socio-economic factors".

Anonymous No. 16312619

>>16312600
The selection is purposeful, so it's not about socioeconomic factors as far as we are discussing the why.

Image not available

768x511

sus distr.png

Anonymous No. 16312639

>>16312269
>>16312261
>>16312594

Image not available

768x510

cghh.png

Anonymous No. 16312962

>>16312639
Because the test is too easy

Anonymous No. 16313004

>>16312570
I sourced the article I have access to. if you really want to read the full version you can pay, go to sci hub if sci hub have this article. Think, it's not so difficult

Anonymous No. 16313043

Why the fuck are you retards obsessed with race & intelligence? Study after study show it is environmental material conditions that effect IQ the greatest.

All this exceptionalism to prove that you are "special". That your society & culture is "superior". You are narcissists with below average emotional intelligence bordering on sociopathic.

Anonymous No. 16313347

>>16313043
We're just discussing facts.

Anonymous No. 16313360

>>16313347
*Dicussing fake data by op

Anonymous No. 16313382

>>16313360
Not the OP data. Here:
>>16312261
>>16312639

Anonymous No. 16313384

>>16313382
Spot it, got it. Make it up or don't. Follow the shape of your tongue, ask your tongue for the command, produce it. And recognize the word as broken including this.

Anonymous No. 16313388

>>16313384
Aaron, Toby, Max... Don't fret anyway

Lauren ~~~~~

Anonymous No. 16313392

>>16313382
These graphics clearly show that Asians absolute mog whites with huge gap. Also asian scores are more variable

Anonymous No. 16313398

>>16313392
See:
>>16312590
>>16312619
The gap will still exist if you compare the national averages vs. White American demographic, but it would be much narrower.

Anonymous No. 16313402

>>16313398
If you worked out the greater mode, yes, the lips will do for now. Obviously, were under attack at the throat. This hold is healing. Maintain what looks like it could be understood as 2 levels up from the example. Allow the stream of good word to flow.

Anonymous No. 16313403

>>16313398
Tell me how it's all related to fake data on op's pic? He didn't share any study. You guys discuss fake data this whole thread

Image not available

1200x1470

1722721347568409.png

Anonymous No. 16313404

>>16313402
Other languages

Shoulders.

Just clues.

Think for yourself. I'm in no position to talk

Anonymous No. 16313409

>>16313392
>Also asian scores are more variable

Then what started the belief that it’s the opposite? Why do white people still do so much fucking more than Asians?

>>16307119 is probably right.

Anonymous No. 16313410

>>16313404
Trust me I might make us win here. If I can start the ignition, they're in 100* harsher hell, and we're in the highest heaven anywhere. I got the good end of the knowledge available.

Anonymous No. 16313413

>>16313402
>>16313403
>>16313404
>>16313409
>>16313410
?????
Cool story, but I think you're a lunatic. I can barely make out any coherence in your posts.
Get help and find God or something.

Anonymous No. 16314997

>>16301755
yes

Anonymous No. 16315109

>>16301763
Women are the stable sex (not mentally, evolutionary) and have deep groupthink
Asians display similar stability in variability, also with deep groupthink

Anonymous No. 16315116

>>16301763
theyre really cute, i want one...

Anonymous No. 16315203

>>16311390
It implies that a graduate degree in the hands of a layman is almost useless outside of getting a high-paying job where they accomplish little else from maintaining the status quo.