Anonymous at Mon, 29 Jul 2024 19:53:31 UTC No. 16302307

John Von Neumann

Anonymous at Mon, 29 Jul 2024 20:01:14 UTC No. 16302322

Any answer other than Isaac Newton is blatant contrarianism

Anonymous at Mon, 29 Jul 2024 20:20:40 UTC No. 16302357

Archimedes obv

Anonymous at Mon, 29 Jul 2024 20:31:39 UTC No. 16302373

Anonymous at Mon, 29 Jul 2024 20:33:52 UTC No. 16302378

>>16302307
He's a thief

Anonymous at Mon, 29 Jul 2024 21:17:25 UTC No. 16302443

>>16302291
Nobody has ever been more literally groundbreaking than Alfred Nobel, the inventor of dynamite.

Cult of Passion at Mon, 29 Jul 2024 21:35:41 UTC No. 16302468

>>16302443
[Prometheus enters the realm.]

Need a light?

Anonymous at Mon, 29 Jul 2024 22:36:09 UTC No. 16302523

Euler and it's not even close

Anonymous at Mon, 29 Jul 2024 22:39:31 UTC No. 16302527

>>16302322
Euler did way more than Newton and continued to contribute throughout his life rather than retreating into schizophrenia.

Anonymous at Mon, 29 Jul 2024 22:41:39 UTC No. 16302528

>>16302527
>Euler did way more than Newton
How much of euler's work can be applied when he and only a few can understand it?

Anonymous at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 00:23:56 UTC No. 16302618

>>16302373
Implying all women are small minded

Anonymous at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 08:53:08 UTC No. 16302967

>>16302291
Maxwell and or Dirac (They contributed shit that matters)

>>16302378
Evidence?

Anonymous at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 08:56:30 UTC No. 16302969

Netwon, but he has to share the top place with leibniz. If the rules stipulate only a singular man can take top place, then it's Steve Jobs, founder and creator of apple and iphone.

Anonymous at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 08:57:33 UTC No. 16302972

>>16302969

apple the PC company not the fruit

Cult of Passion at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 10:03:43 UTC No. 16303027

>>16302972
>Steve Jobs
>he compiled several seperate devices and put them into one
Waa, so innovative!

Anonymous at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 10:11:33 UTC No. 16303030

>>16303027
Yes, Cult of Passion.

Cult of Passion at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 10:16:04 UTC No. 16303033

>>16303030
>you built these?
>no i built this.
No, thats called opportunistic. You "saved time", not Innovate.

MEN KNOW THE DIFFERENCE...

Anonymous at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 12:24:39 UTC No. 16303167

>>16302527
euler did not invent any new discipline, newton did this twice, thrice if you consider opticks

Anonymous at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 13:39:21 UTC No. 16303242

>>16303167
He's right about Euler you stupid midwit. Sheer volume trumps over being in the right place to develop new fields.

Anonymous at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 13:48:19 UTC No. 16303253

>>16303242
Sheer insight mogs volume all day retard. Euler could only do math and some physics, Newton laid down foundations for math as a tool for a physics problem. Euler was a genius but not in the universal sense that newton was, who was also able to work with his hands and invent devices such as the reflecting telescope.

Anonymous at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 13:53:47 UTC No. 16303261

>>16303253
Euler was volume AND insight. You don't know what you're talking about.

Anonymous at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 13:58:14 UTC No. 16303264

>>16303261
Yes in math only, why do you keep missing the point retard? Newton dabbled in almost everything including schizo occult stuff. That's what universal means.

Anonymous at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 14:44:46 UTC No. 16303323

>>16302618
Except the vegan ones, which are great minds accordingly

Anonymous at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 14:50:20 UTC No. 16303332

>>16302307
lol not even close

Anonymous at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 14:50:32 UTC No. 16303333

>>16302969
>rat kike who gypped his autistic wizkid friend who designed the computer that would make him famous
>who later went on to ruin two subsequent generations of humanity with terrible ergonomics and mass access to brainrot social media
>further proving his massive genius by trying to self-cure cancer with carrots

Anonymous at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 15:17:03 UTC No. 16303367

Underage thread, proceed with caution

Anonymous at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 18:18:29 UTC No. 16303488

>>16302291
None, they all stood on the shoulders of giants and were in the right place at the right time. Lone genius types are a thing of the past in modern research, you can spend 200 years in a field like algebraic geometry alone.

If I had to vote I would say Von Neumann or Newton, but even then I'd still go back to my original point.

Anonymous at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 19:08:30 UTC No. 16303547

>>16303264
>Geniuses have to spread out because... they have to!
Retard alert

Anonymous at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 19:15:55 UTC No. 16303558

>>16303547
You have no idea how interdisciplinary reality is, confining your entire world to a tiny esoteric sub section of mathematics then acting like everyone who does not give a single fuck about said tiny esoteric subsection of mathematics is beneath you is small brain move, tiny brain move infact.

Anonymous at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 19:31:49 UTC No. 16303581

>>16303488
>they all stood on the shoulders of giants
They all stood

Anonymous at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 20:18:18 UTC No. 16303647

>>16302322
>Any answer other than Eukleídes is blatant contrarianism
FTFY

Anonymous at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 20:30:36 UTC No. 16303668

>>16303558
Yeah math itself isn't interdisciplinary

Double retard for knowing nothing about math

Anonymous at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 21:07:37 UTC No. 16303703

>>16302967
the thing that you call von Neumann architecture was entirely designed and developed by two gentlemen named J. Presper Eckert and John Mauchly. von Thiefmann joined the research group via his connections in the Army Research Laboratory as an advisor. He documented all the works and ideas, and his thief of a friend published it under his name.

Anonymous at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 21:13:44 UTC No. 16303711

>>16302291
Better question, how do you even quantify this in any meaningful sense?

Anonymous at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 21:17:54 UTC No. 16303715

>>16302291
Feynman

Anonymous at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 21:53:33 UTC No. 16303755

>>16302291
Riemann

Anonymous at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 22:05:42 UTC No. 16303774

>>16302373
Einstein had portraits of Newton, Faraday, and Maxwell on his wall because he looked up to them that much.

Anonymous at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 22:19:45 UTC No. 16303796

>>16303711
Did any of them work in a mine? If so, they probably broke the ground the most.
Otherwise you'd have to try and guess based off if they worked any physical labor jobs like construction or something else that would require moving earth.

Anonymous at Wed, 31 Jul 2024 03:26:10 UTC No. 16304151

>>16302291
probably Tesla

Anonymous at Wed, 31 Jul 2024 08:59:01 UTC No. 16304421

>>16303703
>von Neumann architecture

You know he's known for WAY more than just that right? From physics to econ to computers to pure math etc.

Anonymous at Wed, 31 Jul 2024 16:22:55 UTC No. 16304731

>>16303264
>in math only
The whole angular momentum stuff goes back to Euler.. he was an engineer as well

Anonymous at Wed, 31 Jul 2024 21:28:13 UTC No. 16305021

>>16302291
Newton by far.
Then there's a huge gap and you can maybe find Galileo.

Anonymous at Wed, 31 Jul 2024 21:33:24 UTC No. 16305026

>>16302291
Jesus Christ is by far the most important intellect in all of human history

Anonymous at Wed, 31 Jul 2024 22:43:38 UTC No. 16305098

>>16305021
>>16303558
>>16303167

reddit take

Anonymous at Wed, 31 Jul 2024 23:13:49 UTC No. 16305131

>>16305098
This, everyone knows Euclid was better.

Anonymous at Thu, 1 Aug 2024 20:03:54 UTC No. 16306159

>>16302291
Terence McKenna

Anonymous at Thu, 1 Aug 2024 20:36:29 UTC No. 16306195

>>16302291
bill nye or black soince man. sex junk and white people being more monkey like are essential to modern soince.

Cult of Passion at Thu, 1 Aug 2024 20:46:37 UTC No. 16306207

>>16305021
>Galileo
https://youtu.be/f2PT2kyvGlg

Cult of Passion at Thu, 1 Aug 2024 21:04:08 UTC No. 16306214

>>16305026
https://pubs.vporton.name/2023/01/07/the-theory-of-jesus-as-the-super-mathematician/

Keep it STEM related.

>The Yiddish word for "circle" is kikel.
Geometric Linguistics. This is what Science© looks like.

Anonymous at Thu, 1 Aug 2024 21:54:08 UTC No. 16306264

>...

Anonymous at Thu, 1 Aug 2024 22:23:37 UTC No. 16306283

>>16302291
Bach. The only one who beams his genius directly into you

Anonymous at Thu, 1 Aug 2024 23:09:52 UTC No. 16306319

>>16306264
>pseud faggot detected
Imagine reading non natural philosophy after the year 1687

Anonymous at Fri, 2 Aug 2024 01:10:24 UTC No. 16306435

I would disagree with naming only 1 person as the GOAT.
When someone is a genius, they transcend any concept of "ranking" and become part of a superior dimension.
People like Newton, Euler, Gauss, Einstein, all deserve to be mentioned together without the concept of "ranking". That shit is inferior thinking.

Anonymous at Fri, 2 Aug 2024 02:11:00 UTC No. 16306459

>>16305026
wrong millennium, phag.

Anonymous at Fri, 2 Aug 2024 02:49:41 UTC No. 16306482

>>16306435
>People like Newton, Euler, Gauss, Einstein
They're all below Euclid anyway

Anonymous at Fri, 2 Aug 2024 21:21:13 UTC No. 16307661

>>16303647
no one asked your opinion residen grecoboo faggot.
we are grown ups here.
only elementary school retard will mention any ancient greek as the best mathematician.

Anonymous at Fri, 2 Aug 2024 21:24:44 UTC No. 16307667

>>16306482
>Euclid
see >>16307661
12 year old kids are better mathematicians then euclid and most of his work was just compilations.

Anonymous at Sat, 3 Aug 2024 00:20:09 UTC No. 16307819

>>16302468
Read that in Dr. Manhattan voice
>>16303774
Newton looked up to Galileo I believe.

When it comes to discussions of physics, the fathers of statistical mechanics: Maxwell, Boltzmann, and Gibbs are always overlooked. Maxwell is mostly known for formalizing the laws of electrodynamics. Statistical Mechanics was a great leap however. It's the first time we theorized the unseeable, which we take for granted when studying quantum mechanics and particle physics. Many scientists at the time doubted the existence of particles just thought they were a mathematical trick as opposed to describing a real phenomenon. Their work is definitely the most groundbreaking physics since at least Newton. I will say with Newton, he was a mathematician, astronomer, theorist, and experimentalist which is pretty hard to beat.

Anonymous at Sat, 3 Aug 2024 00:48:10 UTC No. 16307832

>>16302528
>How much of euler's work can be applied when he and only a few can understand it?
All of it. Not everyone needs to understand it.

Anonymous at Sat, 3 Aug 2024 00:59:40 UTC No. 16307844

Tesla probably, he was on the right track, so they shut him down and we never saw his full potential. Other than that, Jesus I would say, but he was so far back in history that the language and recordings where shit to articulate and explain universal truths to the masses, so his message backfired immensely. And here we are, slaves of materialism.