Image not available

750x1246

cvSjpn.png

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16302333

NASA is absurdly claiming that a round planet orbiting a round star in an elliptical orbit has it's highest average temperature shortly following aphelion, when radiation input from the sun is at it's weakest.
How low would your IQ need to be to believe that assertion?

Image not available

400x300

1722113030818653.jpg

Anonymous No. 16302345

Anonymous No. 16302472

>>16302333
Southern hemisphere is mostly water, innit?

Anonymous No. 16302807

>>16302333
Earth's orbit is almost circular, albedo and solar activity have much larger effects than distance

Anonymous No. 16302874

>>16302333
thats what happens when you change the reflectivity of the earths atmosphere.

Anonymous No. 16302931

>>16302333
>le average value of a continuous scalar function over a spherical surface is the highest its ever been!
you cant measure "the global surface temperature"

Anonymous No. 16303137

>>16302333
For the guys that have been dubious on CO2 induced climate change so far (which was me until like last week), it turns out the reason temperatures haven't risen like they said they would was because all that coal and diesel was pumping sulfur into the air. The sulfur was reflecting sunlight and counteracting any warming. Two years ago they finally cleaned up the sulfur from all our fuels. Sulfur stays in the upper atmosphere for only two years. We're gonna start cooking. Anyway the envirotards will never admit that this is why it suddenly started getting hotter, because removing the sulfur was a policy they pushed for.

Image not available

409x114

doomporn.png

Anonymous No. 16303220

it's over

Anonymous No. 16303221

>>16303220
Kyplanet is an EDS faggot

Anonymous No. 16303227

>>16303221
still not wrong though
the luminosity of the sun is already baking us now and it will bake the planet in the future, on top of everything else necessary to maintain the current disequilibrium shutting down

Anonymous No. 16303368

How far back do the records for the average global temperature per individual day of the year go?

Anonymous No. 16303625

>>16303221
what do you have against people with eds

Anonymous No. 16303671

>>16303368
>How far back do the records for the average global temperature per individual day of the year go?

to the dawn of human civilization chud. Science is settled!

Anonymous No. 16303688

>>16303671
Since leftists are busy creating year zero, I have to agree with your assertion that the records do indeed go back to the dawn on human civilization.

Anonymous No. 16303698

>>16302333
and with the sun brightening it will only get hotter!

Image not available

600x920

Noose 2.gif

Anonymous No. 16303710

>>16302333
Knot theory has alreaduy provided a solution to your problem, OP

Anonymous No. 16304149

>>16302333
who the fuck cares about what NASA says?

Anonymous No. 16304166

>>16302333
Gaussian

Anonymous No. 16304314

https://youtu.be/dIGat8l_pGE

Anonymous No. 16304493

>>16302333
3% distance change makes so little difference this is almost certainly related to the fact tht when they say 'global temperature' they really mean 'most of the land and our sensors are in the northern hemisphere which is experiencing summer'.

angle of incidence changes are far more influential

Anonymous No. 16304569

>>16304314
/thread

Anonymous No. 16304629

This thread is full of retards.

Anonymous No. 16304636

>>16304629
If you dont post arguments I assume you are the biggest retard.

Anonymous No. 16304662

>>16304149
Normies and the IFLS! crowd.

Anonymous No. 16304691

>>16303671
june 23, 4269bc was the second hottest day on record

Anonymous No. 16304741

It doesn’t matter what we think now when the Great Dying 2.0 is looming in front of us. The last time temperatures showed such steep increases caused the death of 90% of multicellular life. Here we are, cuz palaeontology don’t reals and muh god made all this shit in 6 days

Anonymous No. 16304750

>>16304741
i bet nothing happens

Anonymous No. 16304774

>>16304636
You think arguing with retards on 4chan makes you smart? Smart people don't waste their time bashing their heads against a wall, anon.

Image not available

896x896

IMG_5584.jpg

Anonymous No. 16304799

>>16302333
I believe it.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/8AHkAJrpAxd4

Anonymous No. 16304804

>>16304774
Then why do you write anything?

Image not available

800x251

Here, you wanted ....jpg

Anonymous No. 16304938

>>16304662
>I don't like it therefore its IFLS

Anonymous No. 16305124

>>16303221
I don't mind the fact that he gave all the people who fell for the meme of Mars colonization a cold shower.

Anonymous No. 16305226

>>16305124
> he gave all the people who fell for the meme of Mars colonization a cold shower
Then he doesn't sound too bad then

Anonymous No. 16305979

>>16304750
>I bet you a million dollars I will never die

Anonymous No. 16306609

>>16304741
name 3 species that have gone extinct in the past 50 years

Anonymous No. 16308003

>>16306609
They can't do it because they're lying about the supposed environmental catastrophe they're shilling.

Anonymous No. 16308419

>>16308003
>>16306609
https://planetsave.com/articles/5-animals-gone-extinct-past-50-years/

Anonymous No. 16308986

>>16308419
thats a fake news political activist website, the fact that you can't find a legitimate source of information shows that your political activist website is lying. the fact that you needed to look it up shows that you don't care about endangered species at all, if you were legitimately concerned you'd have had the answer off the top of your head

Image not available

406x503

greta.jpg

Anonymous No. 16309989

>>16304799

Anonymous No. 16311584

>>16308419
>5-animals-gone-extinct-past-50-years
So one every 10 year even if that were real, which it is not. A mass extinction event involves over a million animal species going extinct over a short period of time. One every 10 years would mean the period for a million extinctions would be 10 million years, which is not a short period of time.
The Permian-Triassic extinction lasted at most 200,000 years and many million species were driven to extinction during the period.

Anonymous No. 16311590

>>16302333
I think the black mat layer that's literally visible globally all over the Earth in rock would disagree with that assertion.

Anonymous No. 16311774

>>16302333
average temp of the whole world aint remotely the same as peak temps

australia is literally a barren desert because of the sun in their summer, and south america only survives because it gets narrow

and also because the orbit isnt that elliptical

Anonymous No. 16312995

>>16311584
all that nonstop propaganda about the "anthropocene extinction" is just a bunch of lies contrived to justify political power grabs by the liars

Anonymous No. 16314542

>>16311584
so you need at least 10 extinctions annually, but probably closer to 100, for an extinction event to be ongoing and we're currently seeing a rate of about 0.04 annually.
and why is it even bad if species go extinct? extinction is how evolution makes room for the better adapted species

Anonymous No. 16316195

>>16314542
>I believe in evolution
but also
>this unfit species must be preserved eternally

🗑️ Anonymous No. 16316211

When you're cooking meat in an oven and you take it out of the oven and let it sit, its temperature rises for a few minutes as it sits. Could this effect be related to Earth getting hotter after aphelion?

Anonymous No. 16316223

When you're cooking meat in an oven and you take it out of the oven and let it sit, its temperature rises for a few minutes as it sits. Could this effect be related?

Anonymous No. 16316278

>>16302345
lol. saving this

Anonymous No. 16316806

>>16304804
We're you aware that you were a retard before I told you? I suspect not. Fix it.

Anonymous No. 16316811

>>16316195
>>16314542
>>16312995
>>16311584
>>16308986
>>16308419
>>16308003
>>16306609
>name 3 species that have gone extinct in the past 50 years
>Here's 5
>So only 5 species have gone extinct in the last 50 years
Is this the power of ignorance and faulty logic?

Anonymous No. 16317751

>>16316811
you can't name 3 species that have gone extinct in the past 50 years, you couldn't even name a single one

Anonymous No. 16318993

>>16317751
Species aren't going extinct, thats just another big lie the globohomo doomsday shills constantly circulate in order to justify their savior complexes

Anonymous No. 16320433

>>16318993
>Species aren't going extinct
what about dark species?