🗑️ 🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 04:16:08 UTC No. 16302824
What are the differences between every 10s of IQ tiers? How do you tell the difference when observing their behavior?
Anonymous at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 04:18:07 UTC No. 16302825
>>16302824
The standard deviation is 15 points, so every 10 point increase lands you in about the same tier 1/3 of the time.
Anonymous at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 04:25:29 UTC No. 16302827
>>16302825
Blah blah blah
Nerds are supposed to be smart, yet 120 IQ people and 130 IQ people clearly perform differently. The former tend to get stuck thinking they're right about God or atheism being the only truth because they thought about it for a few hours across their life.
Anonymous at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 04:29:55 UTC No. 16302829
>>16302827
115-129
130-145
Different categories, retard, IQ has a sigma of 15
Anonymous at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 12:59:24 UTC No. 16303193
>>16302829
So are the 10s stupid faggot, you're just too much of a nerd to see it.
Anonymous at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 13:20:32 UTC No. 16303218
>>16302829
so tell me anon, what's the difference between a 129 and a 130
Anonymous at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 13:23:07 UTC No. 16303222
>>16303218
He's a midwit so he's not going to be able to tell you. SD isn't even that important besides statistical calculational convenience.
Anonymous at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 13:38:15 UTC No. 16303241
>>16302825
>Only 1stdev implies a quantifiable and measurable observable difference
>Because because I just like the number 1 okay!!!
Anonymous at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 13:50:46 UTC No. 16303257
>>16302824
From what I tell, it information manipulation. More IQ, more ability to store, alter, combine information. Would probably needs some secret universal test with a set amount of data and have millions of people from each category of the IQ spectrum take then compare numbers.
Anonymous at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 13:52:47 UTC No. 16303260
>>16303257
What are the sets of behaviors and differences among the tiers?
🗑️ Anonymous at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 14:10:54 UTC No. 16303274
>>16303260
NTA
100-115
>you can understand established knowledge with significant effort--taking colour-coding notes, attending lectures, doing your homework, troubleshooting with friends, etc
>115-130
you are usually top of your class, the teacher's pet, valedictorian, most phds and professors are in this category
>130-145
Established knowledge is a breeze, you can master it in a couple of months with significant effort--reading a lot, you are able to come up with original insights on some topics that you are an expert on,
>145-160
Coming up with original insights is a breeze, you can do this in topics you are not an expert on, and you can also be good at both the arts and sciences, being able to write a book like moby dick or coming up with original insights like einstein's relativity depending on your effort, interests and motivations.
Anonymous at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 14:12:01 UTC No. 16303275
>>16303260
NTA
>100-115
you can understand established knowledge with significant effort--taking colour-coding notes, attending lectures, doing your homework, troubleshooting with friends, etc
>115-130
you are usually top of your class, the teacher's pet, valedictorian, most phds and professors are in this category
>130-145
Established knowledge is a breeze, you can master it in a couple of months with significant effort--reading a lot, you are able to come up with original insights on some topics that you are an expert on,
>145-160
Coming up with original insights is a breeze, you can do this in topics you are not an expert on, and you can also be good at both the arts and sciences, being able to write a book like moby dick or coming up with original insights like einstein's relativity depending on your effort, interests and motivations.
Anonymous at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 14:14:27 UTC No. 16303279
>>16303275
So blunt
Anyone here got better insights?
Anonymous at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 14:16:48 UTC No. 16303281
>>16303275
Did you just made that up ?
Anonymous at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 14:19:59 UTC No. 16303283
>>16302829
Why are SDs the preferred categories, why was this decided on, and why are 10s not categories?
Anonymous at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 14:24:33 UTC No. 16303288
>>16303275
me when i make up shit
>t. 160
Anonymous at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 14:26:32 UTC No. 16303293
>>16303275
<130 Irrelevant
<170 danger zone
<200 respectable
Anonymous at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 14:28:38 UTC No. 16303297
>>16303293
Excuse me, you mean >200, like supergeniuses like myself. Anything less and you might as well be shitposting on a Korean yodeling board.
Anonymous at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 14:43:54 UTC No. 16303319
>>16303281
There's always an iq chart doing the rounds on /sci/, find it and confirm. Though I am willing to bet you retarded newfag zoomers have never even heard that term before.
Anonymous at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 14:46:28 UTC No. 16303327
>>16303283
He doesn't know. He's a midwit with no original thoughts and believes in SD like a fable.
Anonymous at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 17:23:36 UTC No. 16303440
>>16302824
Productivity.
Anonymous at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 17:38:05 UTC No. 16303452
>>16303275
Here's a post from last year for you retards who think I am making this up, though the comments in there are a bit harsher.
https://warosu.org/sci/thread/15271
Anonymous at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 18:33:57 UTC No. 16303506
>>16303297
Such an intelligence would recognize IQ tests are insufficient for measuring such an intelligence. One would expect there to be around 800-1600 such people in the world, but bias in the structure indicates that the current testing scale would estimate a factor that is a product of ten to one hundred times that.
Anonymous at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 18:45:32 UTC No. 16303525
>>16302824
the people in the 115 range are the dumbest
Anonymous at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 18:48:42 UTC No. 16303529
>>16303525
>I am sooo smart
>Accomplish absolutely nothing of value
Anonymous at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 19:39:05 UTC No. 16303591
>>16303275
>and you can also be good at both the arts and sciences
Anonymous at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 21:38:31 UTC No. 16303730
>>16303452
This reads like GPT
Anonymous at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 21:40:01 UTC No. 16303735
God being a midwit is depressing. I wish IQ was actually malleable/fake like the libs claim.
Anonymous at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 21:42:14 UTC No. 16303737
>>16303442
Yes, because sub 130 is also pushed into midwit, and sometimes sub 140 because it's not even 1 in 1000 or whatever and you probably know someone that smart in your town
Not my opinion, since at that point even people who are considered to have mild ID would be midwit too, but that's how the discussion goes
Anonymous at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 22:18:50 UTC No. 16303794
>>16303730
Why wouldn't it be, the last 3 categories have almost the same properties
Anonymous at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 22:21:09 UTC No. 16303799
>>16303735
>I wish IQ was actually malleable
You know the first protohumans were probably sub 80.
Anonymous at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 22:22:41 UTC No. 16303801
>>16303794
It's impressive how far it's come in a year
Anonymous at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 22:25:16 UTC No. 16303804
>>16303799
And then selective pressures called for more intelligence, along with us having more food to support bigger brains
Fact is it's highly heritable and based on an inflexible neurology, else we'd have interventions that can actually raise it permanently
Anonymous at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 22:57:33 UTC No. 16303840
>>16303506
IQ also implicitly requires a standard of resource/material availability for 100% reliability (i.e. at the edge cases) that is simply unrealistic. I’d bet that 99.99% of infants with the genetic component for ridiculously high information processing are fucked over by socioeconomic factors — that is, the resources required to support a child with that level of ability are ridiculously rare in the grand scheme of things — and thus their score would be lower at the point of testing, if the little fucker gets tested at all.
Anonymous at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 23:22:03 UTC No. 16303864
>>16303735
Depends on the test. MENSA tests are just ego-stroking scams, and historically 'IQ' was just school performance. Nowadays there's more accurate metrics, but generally, as a 110 u could learn your way to a 130 with enough effort. Practically, all midwits are the same, and anything above/below 140/70 is the same.
Anonymous at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 23:25:29 UTC No. 16303869
>>16302824
do you have a chart with good olds retards/idiots/morons
Anonymous at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 23:30:23 UTC No. 16303876
>>16303735
It’s malleable over multiple generations and has been proved. It’s how we got here. Basically we just need to teach the Africans to learn.
Anonymous at Wed, 31 Jul 2024 01:13:41 UTC No. 16304009
>>16303864
>MENSA tests are just ego-stroking scams
No they aren't. They gatekeep 120 IQers fine.
>Nowadays there's more accurate metrics, but generally, as a 110 u could learn your way to a 130 with enough effort.
Completely wrong. A whole SD cannot be faked in modern standardized tests, nor 10, and variability stabilizes within 5.
Anonymous at Wed, 31 Jul 2024 04:58:34 UTC No. 16304219
Take the example of heights, for instance. Most people at 6'5"+ are not very insecure about their heights. Most people at 5'10" are insecure and usually claim 6'. Most people at 5'8" are also insecure but never claim to be much taller than they actually are. I have a tested IQ of 150+ and I have friends at 130+, 120+, 100+, etc. IMO, most people with around 130IQ tend to have a good understanding of their standing in terms of intellect. People with around 120 IQ tend to be very narcissistic and blockheaded. They are gifted in few areas but they can never contribute anything completely original to the field. The people I've known at this range tend to be very insecure. But this is just my personal experience
Anonymous at Wed, 31 Jul 2024 06:16:17 UTC No. 16304274
>>16303876
I mean our ancestors were like 4'10 until sexual selection got us to where 6 feet is normal lol
The height analogy is powerful because it illustrates how pointless this whole exercise of trying to raise IQ is. How can I expect to make my mind faster? It's my neurology. Can't do shit about it, and the problem will only get worse as we age. All we can do is seethe about our 6'4 masters and pretend it's not over for manlets like coping incels. Just fucked again by the genetic lottery lol
Anonymous at Wed, 31 Jul 2024 06:27:43 UTC No. 16304289
>>16302824
For ever +/-10 you get weirder and more eccentric
Every +10 you're weird in the sense that you're more and more easily bored and need more and more to entertain yourself
Every -10 you're weird in the sense that you're more and more easily entertained and need less and less to be fascinated.
Anonymous at Wed, 31 Jul 2024 06:47:06 UTC No. 16304311
>>16302824
>70-79
Low reading/writing performance
>80-89
Moderate reading/writing performance
>90-99
High reading/writing performance
>100-109
Low research/publishing performance
>110-119
Moderate reasearch/publishing performance
>120-129
High research/publishing performance
>130-139
Subject matter expert/Academic leader performance
>140+
Nobel laureate performance
Anonymous at Wed, 31 Jul 2024 07:02:20 UTC No. 16304344
>>16302824
I'll explain it to you. It's quite simple really.
>0-10IQ
Vegetable
>10-20IQ
Goldfish
>20-30IQ
Rabbit
>30-40IQ
Dog
>40-50IQ
Monkey
>50-60IQ
Toddler
>60-70IQ
Retard
>70-80IQ
Simpleton
>80-90IQ
Incompetent
>90-100IQ
Cop
>100-110IQ
/sci/ poster (thinks they have 140IQ)
>110-120IQ
Bachelor degree cuck
>120-130IQ
Super cucked doctor, lawyer, pharmacist, etc.
>130-140IQ
Uneducated self-made millionaires
>140+IQ
Academic slave until adulthood then gradually become academic overlord
Anonymous at Wed, 31 Jul 2024 07:50:57 UTC No. 16304400
>>16303730
lmao, does your gpt write the word retard often or are you just salty you are not as smart as you thought you were
Anonymous at Wed, 31 Jul 2024 10:51:07 UTC No. 16304491
>>16304400
did you not open the link
Anonymous at Wed, 31 Jul 2024 10:52:35 UTC No. 16304492
>>16304491
also on the original post, 1/100 people are not experts in months lmao
Anonymous at Wed, 31 Jul 2024 11:06:17 UTC No. 16304497
>>16302824
I feel like IQ differences are way more stark below the 100-mark. A comparison between an IQ of 80 and an IQ of 90 might yield interesting results, whereas 110 and 120 would be indistinguishable.
Anonymous at Wed, 31 Jul 2024 11:45:55 UTC No. 16304524
>>16304492
Expert in algebra or calculus, not in fucking engineering, and it also said with significant effort. If you gave a person in that iq range one to two years, they could master an entire bachelor's program, if they had nothing else to study. Remember these people are usually interested in multiple disciplines, some of them are running their own businesses, writing books, playing sports, studying etc.
Anonymous at Wed, 31 Jul 2024 12:04:25 UTC No. 16304536
>>16304492
And the point about 'in a couple of months' is that from this range onward, you don't need to do homework and take notes to master something, you don't need to follow a curated curriculum that has you attending classes every week at a certain time for a certain duration, you no longer need tutorials, practice sessions, etc. You can pick up a book, read it and understand, the more you do it, the easier it becomes for you to become an expert.
Anonymous at Wed, 31 Jul 2024 13:17:46 UTC No. 16304585
>>16304524
That's just not an expert. Proficient in a subject vs tangling with the fucking experts are 2 different things.
Anonymous at Wed, 31 Jul 2024 18:29:10 UTC No. 16304851
>>16304311
>>16304344
Blunt midwit takes, who here actually know things?
Anonymous at Wed, 31 Jul 2024 18:30:11 UTC No. 16304852
>>16304497
Wrong, 110 is a shopkeeper, 120 is a librarian. It's a pretty clear difference.
Anonymous at Wed, 31 Jul 2024 21:02:16 UTC No. 16304991
>>16304852
I didn't realize librarians were that intelligent as a rule, even though it generally requires a master's
I guess I assumed even we normies/dummies get masters these days
Anonymous at Wed, 31 Jul 2024 22:41:16 UTC No. 16305094
>>16304991
pretty significant difference between a university librarian/archivist and your everyday public librarian
Anonymous at Thu, 1 Aug 2024 13:00:37 UTC No. 16305794
>>16302824
iq is a meme
Anonymous at Fri, 2 Aug 2024 03:38:09 UTC No. 16306510
>>16302824
Barely any difference. They are all meatbags.
Anonymous at Fri, 2 Aug 2024 11:11:10 UTC No. 16306878
>>16304344
unironically this looks more resonable and relatable than other takes kek
Anonymous at Fri, 2 Aug 2024 11:37:43 UTC No. 16306900
>>16303275
>>115-130
>you are usually top of your class
roughly from 1 out of 7 to 1 out of 50 people have an iq between 115 - 130
Anonymous at Fri, 2 Aug 2024 12:25:25 UTC No. 16306948
iq is great but these descriptions are always pseud bullshit.
about 20% of people above 130 are neet losers while every white collar profession like md, lawyer, pilot, researcher etc sits at a median of 110.
especially in this day and age you can achieve any social strata you set you mind to as a 100iq person or you could struggle to stay out of poverty.
it doesn't matter either way, we're all replaceable if you try to quantify human worth this way, there are plenty of high to average high brahmins to take your job.