Anonymous at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 14:40:41 UTC No. 16303312

>>16303310
Schizos are attracted to foundations, more news at 11.

Anonymous at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 14:47:21 UTC No. 16303328

>>16303310
Practically all science is done from a naturalistic world view (and naturalism is self-refuting btw), which is why you have trannies and sodomites pushing tranny shit on kids. It doesn't matter what they profess as a belief when they don't actually practice it.

Anonymous at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 15:39:31 UTC No. 16303386

>>16303312
True

Anonymous at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 15:47:16 UTC No. 16303390

>>16303310
mathematics is a spiritual practice

Anonymous at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 15:51:36 UTC No. 16303393

>>16303310
atheists are cringe as fuck lmao glad you finally noticed

Anonymous at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 16:42:57 UTC No. 16303418

Based. What university?

Anonymous at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 17:27:56 UTC No. 16303443

Don't display pork underneath swine.

Anonymous at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 18:08:18 UTC No. 16303473

>>16303310
Because math and science assume that the world can be explained with logic and reason and therefore must assume that the world itself is at least to a degree logical and reasonable in nature and therefore must believe that there's something that ensures the world logical and reasonable which means either God is real and/or math is real and/or God is math and/or math is God.

Now what is not logical and reasonable about this argument?

Anonymous at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 18:45:20 UTC No. 16303523

>>16303310
Based

Anonymous at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 18:51:23 UTC No. 16303532

>>16303473
You assume because logic matches reality, reality must have been made to be logical
Logic, however, was created to describe reality, same as math. It's not that reality is logical, it's that logic is realistic.
You could invent a set of logical or mathematical axioms that have no bearing with reality, and they'd still be internally selfconsistant but not useful.

Anonymous at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 19:14:11 UTC No. 16303555

>>16303532
A symbol implies that there's something that is symbolized. That's why you have no other choice but to believe in vampires because the existence of that fictional narrative implies that in reality there really are logical structures that function in ways that you would describe as vampiric.

Anonymous at Tue, 30 Jul 2024 19:22:09 UTC No. 16303565

>>16303555
Checked, but wrong
The concept of a vampire does exist, but this has no bearing on reality.
Given some set of axioms, you could argue that 2 + 2 = 1, for example in modular arithmetic base 3. This is 100% true, within those axioms, but in reality 2 things and 2 things still gives you 4 things.

You could logically define "soul" as "the thing that every living human has and is immaterial," but that's still just defining souls into existence. Same for god, same for anything.
My point is that if the universe were different, we'd have different laws of logic and mathematics, and you'd still be able to say
>see? math describes reality, therefore god.
You just have the thing backwards. It's as simple as that.