🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Thu, 1 Aug 2024 15:37:52 UTC No. 16305923
Are quantum particles simply just multi-dimensional objects?
For instance if we take a stoplight that is red for 2 seconds and green for 3 seconds; If we observe it as a four-dimensional object through time and we connect the start of the stoplight with the end of the stop light then there is a 40% chance that the stoplight is red and a 60% chance that the stoplight is green. Where we collapse the wave function to is simply a matter of at what 'time' do we pick.
Just like a flatlander doesn't have the ability to choose what two-dimensional slice of a 3D object they get, we don't have the ability (yet) to choose what form of the subatomic particle we pick.
Anonymous at Thu, 1 Aug 2024 15:54:24 UTC No. 16305935
No
Anonymous at Thu, 1 Aug 2024 16:27:50 UTC No. 16305958
King Aether Champion of Sci at Thu, 1 Aug 2024 16:32:03 UTC No. 16305962
No.
Anonymous at Thu, 1 Aug 2024 17:56:41 UTC No. 16306048
>>16305923
Why do normies wish to understand quantum physics? Why must they ask about Einstein and Deepak Chopra's quantum cunny before F= M*A simple free fall?
Anonymous at Thu, 1 Aug 2024 18:14:42 UTC No. 16306057
>>16305923
superluminality explains everything, without needing hidden variables
Anonymous at Thu, 1 Aug 2024 18:25:21 UTC No. 16306066
>>16305923
at the very least our theories cant explain it since we cant predict most quantum effects perfectly.
Anonymous at Thu, 1 Aug 2024 20:16:42 UTC No. 16306178
maybe
Anonymous at Fri, 2 Aug 2024 03:50:22 UTC No. 16306524
>>16305923
nope ! good try tho :D
Anonymous at Sat, 3 Aug 2024 08:03:18 UTC No. 16308243
Le pizz
brrr
Anonymous at Sun, 4 Aug 2024 02:27:27 UTC No. 16309252
>>16305923
String theory already did that, and unfortunately no, the probability doesn't disappear when you poof in new dimensions