Anonymous at Thu, 1 Aug 2024 22:43:09 UTC No. 16306297

There are basically zero women in my subfield despite the incredible DEI push for them. If you are female and qualified to work in this field, I doubt you will ever be rejected for an interview. I have never actually met a woman at any company I have worked at who was not in HR or some other department doing something else.

Anonymous at Thu, 1 Aug 2024 23:18:23 UTC No. 16306339

>>16306063
I didn't notice a change in demographics, but I noticed that physicists in 2022 are mediocre compared to the ones from 1927. It might have to do with the fact that there are too many jews in there and not enough aryans, but that's just a tiny hunch

Anonymous at Thu, 1 Aug 2024 23:22:18 UTC No. 16306346

>>16306339
>physics in 1927 was dominated by jews

Anonymous at Thu, 1 Aug 2024 23:42:14 UTC No. 16306366

>>16306346
No it wasnt you negroid retard, there are more nazis in the 1927 Solvay picture then there are jews. Even someone like Von Neumann needed a literal british faggot like Turing to actually make computers

Anonymous at Fri, 2 Aug 2024 00:21:46 UTC No. 16306394

>>16306366
>there are more nazis in the 1927 Solvay picture then there are jews.
Uh, no? There are two nazis, five jews and one loli enjoyer.

Anonymous at Fri, 2 Aug 2024 02:57:13 UTC No. 16306486

>>16306063
the wimmin are all in assembly. Allegedly, we have like 2 fem engies at the other building. They giggle and laugh and make my heart warm and fuzzy so I'd say they're improving things

Anonymous at Fri, 2 Aug 2024 11:53:40 UTC No. 16306916

>>16306366
oh right, all the physicists in 1927 were in that solvay picture. lemme just forget
>oppenheimer
>bloch
>rabi
>levi-civita
>schwarzschild
>bethe
>landau
>wigner
>london
>noether
>ising
>franck
etc., etc.

Anonymous at Fri, 2 Aug 2024 11:58:46 UTC No. 16306924

>>16306346
>>16306394
>>16306916

Anonymous at Fri, 2 Aug 2024 12:16:51 UTC No. 16306941

>>16306924
>t. chink/eurotrash/jeet who can't cope with the idea that 99.9% of their people are too shitbrained to rotate an imaginary cube in their mind, let alone contribute to our understanding of physics.

Anonymous at Fri, 2 Aug 2024 12:57:53 UTC No. 16306988

>>16306941
And what are you my mystery meat friend?

Anonymous at Fri, 2 Aug 2024 13:12:40 UTC No. 16307006

>>16306988
only the best.

Anonymous at Fri, 2 Aug 2024 13:20:14 UTC No. 16307013

>>16306063
Only ""people"" who have no personal achievements feel the need to cling to the achievements of others with their skin colour. Basically, you're all worthless pieces of shit which will never amount to anything.

Anonymous at Sat, 3 Aug 2024 07:00:30 UTC No. 16308210

>>16307006
You payed for inclusion of your dna to shadowy deepstate

Anonymous at Sat, 3 Aug 2024 12:49:16 UTC No. 16308397

>>16306063
The Professor, first row right of center.

Anonymous at Sat, 3 Aug 2024 12:59:43 UTC No. 16308409

>>16306063
>There are basically zero women in my subfield despite the incredible DEI push for them.
not even just my subfield, but literally my experimental physics 101 class back a few years ago with over 100 students in the lecture hall had a grand total of... 7 (Seven) females.
When I did my bachelors, the department where I did my bachelors thesis had about 15-20 people and a grand total of... 0 (Zero) females.
I don't know how/why published statistics now show that like 20-25% of physics students are females, but anecdotally I cannot confirm this at all from my lived experience in my university.

Anonymous at Sat, 3 Aug 2024 13:08:30 UTC No. 16308421

>>16306063
How were that many physicists convinced to wear suits?

Anonymous at Sat, 3 Aug 2024 13:28:41 UTC No. 16308440

>>16307006
>wales