Anonymous at Fri, 6 Sep 2024 20:48:25 UTC No. 16364388

>>16364372
An another exact copy of your brain would not have your consciousness. It's a completely different person but with the same memories as you. It's not you though

Anonymous at Fri, 6 Sep 2024 20:58:39 UTC No. 16364397

>>16364388
How do you know though?

Anonymous at Fri, 6 Sep 2024 21:02:16 UTC No. 16364401

>>16364372
I don't see how it would be possible physiologically for a Boltzmann brain to form in a functional manner. Space is like 2 degrees above absolute zero

Anonymous at Fri, 6 Sep 2024 21:15:52 UTC No. 16364421

Boltzmann brain is retarded idea. If the formation of functionally complex object as brain was so spontaneous, we'd have shit load of them right now. Don't entertain these nonsense ideas.

Anonymous at Fri, 6 Sep 2024 21:17:15 UTC No. 16364425

>>16364421
the universe hasn't even existed for as long as it would take to develop one but that absolutely doesnt mean its nonsense
after all you cant disprove the theory

Anonymous at Fri, 6 Sep 2024 22:17:58 UTC No. 16364597

>>16364425
>after all you cant disprove the theory
The sign of a bad idea, and not a theory.
A theory is by definition falsifiable, but has data which supports it and none that directly refutes it.
If your idea is unfalsifiable it's not worth believing in, unless you admit it's simply an axiom and you have no reason to believe it.

Anonymous at Fri, 6 Sep 2024 22:19:41 UTC No. 16364601

>>16364597
very narrow minded thinking

Anonymous at Fri, 6 Sep 2024 22:22:01 UTC No. 16364612

>>16364601
Prove it. While you're at it, you can't disprove the idea that faeries are the cause of consciousness, which would disprove Boltzman because once the faeries die there'd be no more consciousness.