Anonymous at Sat, 7 Sep 2024 15:08:19 UTC No. 16365965

>Microtubules: Your Bodies Psychic Architecture - Project Unity
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UVCSPRZfkJs

Anonymous at Sat, 7 Sep 2024 15:08:54 UTC No. 16365966

>>16365963
No, there is no evidence for any such theories.

Anonymous at Sat, 7 Sep 2024 15:11:11 UTC No. 16365969

>>16365966
Surprisingly, this year there was some evidence in favour of some of these claims, in particular that microtubules actually do provide the right environment for quantum effects to be observed.

Anonymous at Sat, 7 Sep 2024 15:11:25 UTC No. 16365970

>>16365966
Ginger Beer with Chilli and Lime Potatoes.

Anonymous at Sat, 7 Sep 2024 15:12:35 UTC No. 16366002

>>16365969
The supposed connection between consciousness and quantum woo is nothing but Penrose cope.
>I don't want to be bound by Godel's incompleteness theorems, because that hurts my feelings :(
That's literally it.

Anonymous at Sat, 7 Sep 2024 15:15:23 UTC No. 16366006

>>16366002
You are free to make a coherent argument whenever you want.

Anonymous at Sat, 7 Sep 2024 15:15:53 UTC No. 16366007

What's the dog pill of this?

Anonymous at Sat, 7 Sep 2024 15:18:48 UTC No. 16366009

>>16366007
DVD player - discover hidden dimensionality - search this spot deeply for dials - do - ??? Do again but with control over mind-space ???

Need to know if last step is true.

Anonymous at Sat, 7 Sep 2024 15:48:13 UTC No. 16366045

>>16366006
I'll let Penrose go first.

Anonymous at Sat, 7 Sep 2024 15:53:28 UTC No. 16366051

While more generally accepted theories assert that consciousness emerges as the complexity of the computations performed by cerebral neurons increases,[4][5]

Orchestrated objective reduction has been criticized from its inception by mathematicians, philosophers,[9][10][11][12][13] and scientists.[14][15][16]
>>16365963(You)

Anonymous at Sat, 7 Sep 2024 15:55:23 UTC No. 16366052

>free will realized by many to not exist, filters out people who dont understand
>some cant accept they have no cotrol
>media pushes fake alternate "theory"
>now your post this understanding it since its easier than arguing the truth

Anonymous at Sat, 7 Sep 2024 16:10:54 UTC No. 16366073

>>16366052
>point to an argument instead of an actual argument
Every time. NPCs cannot deal with self reference.

Anonymous at Sat, 7 Sep 2024 16:24:28 UTC No. 16366085

Doubtful. Feel free to prove they do.

Anonymous at Sat, 7 Sep 2024 16:25:53 UTC No. 16366092

>>16366073
i just enjoy seeing you squirm

Anonymous at Sat, 7 Sep 2024 23:41:13 UTC No. 16366878

>>16366045
RHETORICAL SMACKDOWN
DAMAGE CRITICAL

Anonymous at Sun, 8 Sep 2024 04:10:04 UTC No. 16367394

>>16365963
yes especially when doped with Psilocin

Anonymous at Sun, 8 Sep 2024 06:43:57 UTC No. 16367547

>>16365963
no.

Anonymous at Sun, 8 Sep 2024 06:51:17 UTC No. 16367556

Yes, it explains the activity of inert gas anaesthetics when classical chemistry doesnt.

Anonymous at Sun, 8 Sep 2024 06:54:12 UTC No. 16367558

>>16367556
>xenon
>chemically inert
>somehow affects the brain
>despite no actual fucking chemical reactions going on

Anonymous at Sun, 8 Sep 2024 06:55:59 UTC No. 16367562

>>16367556
>>16367558
Your eyeballs have photons hitting them. Photons are quantum particles. Ipso fucking facto your nerves are engaged in some kind of quantum interactions. Only microtubules explain this.

Anonymous at Sun, 8 Sep 2024 07:00:10 UTC No. 16367567

>>16367558
What if I told you that xenon is not really so "inert" after all, and acts as an NMDA receptor antagonist?

https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jp101687j

Anonymous at Sun, 8 Sep 2024 07:05:07 UTC No. 16367573

>>16367567
There is no *chemical reaction* involved that causes it to act as a receptor antagonist. It literally doesnt even produce any byproducts. This implies quantum effects. Or you believe its magic.

Anonymous at Sun, 8 Sep 2024 07:06:08 UTC No. 16367574

>>16367567
>it just magically does this
>and produces no reactant byproducts
>but no, its not quantum, its just magic