Image not available

990x9900

How the luxury be....jpg

๐Ÿ—‘๏ธ ๐Ÿงต Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16366428

Does picrel recent article from The Times of London explain why there has been so little substantial significant progress in the sciences in the current century?

>How the luxury beliefs of an educated elite erode society

https://www.thetimes.com/uk/article/how-the-luxury-beliefs-of-an-educated-elite-erode-society-0mx8fd2nl

Anonymous No. 16368763

>>16366428
Thats a good article, explains a lot

Anonymous No. 16368804

>>16366428
So this is whats meant by elite overproduction naruhodo..

Gonna be using 'luxury beliefs' a lot now at rhe next leftist commie richkid I see

Anonymous No. 16368825

I really don't see where you would have drawn the connection between the current state of the sciences and the essay presented.

Science and academia certainly have an overrepresentation of upper classes, but they are more accessible to the lower classes than probably ever before in history. The guy who wrote that essay is a good example.

The entire essay also reads to me like this was a low-class person who got to Yale, realized that this fact got people to listen to him without his peers being able to challenge him and then he made that his entire profile. Much like how the only articles in Physics World written by women or minorities were about what it's like to be a woman or minority in physics. I kind of get it but do not really respect it.

Anonymous No. 16368902

>>16366428
I don't like it when they don't link or even name the surveys they're talking about.