🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Sun, 8 Sep 2024 18:24:59 UTC No. 16368487
> eye color is 90%
That still seems too low for eye color. I'm calling bullshit: there must be measurement bias or reporting errors because these estimates seem too low to make sense. There must be some kind of downward bias at play here because there's no way that random/environmental effects would be this large.
Anonymous at Sun, 8 Sep 2024 18:27:16 UTC No. 16368490
>>16368487
Why is hair color?
Anonymous at Sun, 8 Sep 2024 18:34:10 UTC No. 16368497
Make it simple. Do you know how h^2 in the case of herability is definied.
It's about twin-studies.
Anonymous at Sun, 8 Sep 2024 18:39:09 UTC No. 16368503
>>16368497
I know how twin studies work. I'm saying that these estimates seem too low and there must be a downward bias.
Anonymous at Sun, 8 Sep 2024 18:39:35 UTC No. 16368504
>>16368487
>you have no choice in the matter
But enough about adult men raping little boys.
Anonymous at Sun, 8 Sep 2024 23:42:34 UTC No. 16368927
>>16368487
damn so why did we end up with so many homos?
Anonymous at Sun, 8 Sep 2024 23:53:05 UTC No. 16368942
>>16368487
I don't think it's inheritable at all -- or extremely minimally. I think it's indoctrination in the case of children of gay parents.
I remember Tyler Fischer recently mentioned on Rogan what it was like growing up with gay parents.
>"It fucks you up. I started to think, maybe I'm gay...."
https://youtu.be/3Ry3T61InII?t=90
Anonymous at Mon, 9 Sep 2024 18:21:20 UTC No. 16370096
>>16368927
It's more to do with bad studies. Take these results with a grain of salt.
Anonymous at Mon, 9 Sep 2024 18:43:23 UTC No. 16370141
>>16368927
Homosexuality is a reproduction limiter. Males who have more older brothers are more likely to end up homosexual. This is by design as it prevents humans from exceeding the carrying capacity.
Anonymous at Mon, 9 Sep 2024 19:02:37 UTC No. 16370183
>>16368487
You are thinking of old data before the great muttening. The stodge of modern mad is abysmal.
Anonymous at Mon, 9 Sep 2024 19:10:29 UTC No. 16370201
>>16368487
I mean, consider it rationally. How are faggot supposed to reproduce? At best it has to be a recessive gene of two straights reproducing to get a fag. So, at best, it can only be 25% heritable.
Anonymous at Mon, 9 Sep 2024 19:19:21 UTC No. 16370220
>>16368487
Why is this gay conflating not choosing to be gay with gay being genetic?
Anonymous at Mon, 9 Sep 2024 21:31:11 UTC No. 16370514
>>16368487
Are you saying that if two gay men have a child together, he or she will almost certainly not be gay?
Anonymous at Wed, 11 Sep 2024 14:05:26 UTC No. 16374248
>>16368487
Source? And has it been peer reviewed
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 04:36:50 UTC No. 16375479
>>16368487
I can think of a pretty common way homosexuality is inherited
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 04:50:25 UTC No. 16375496
>>16368927
I personally think human sexuality has a "malleable" period, probably near the beginning of puberty, where the various things and people children are exposed too during that time heavily influences their future sexual preferences; not just gay or straight, but what kind of partners people prefer, or if they develop a strong fetishes, and so on. More children during that time period being exposed to homosexual behavior (be it just seeing homos in public, or outright molestation) causes a greater number of the more malleable ones to become gay themselves.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 13:59:49 UTC No. 16376947
>>16368487
10% does sound a bit high, but there are a wide array of prenatal conditions (genetic and otherwise) that can unexpectedly affect eye color.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 14:06:40 UTC No. 16376953
>>16375496
Great hypothesis. This is also why children's movies with anthropomorphic animals has been such a disaster