🧵 Time travel
Anonymous at Mon, 9 Sep 2024 06:07:34 UTC No. 16369281
>Send quantum particle back in time in a way that can be measured
>Establish a code in advance based on the measurements, locations, or frequencies of quantum particles sent into the past
>Hook this code up to a computer to automatically be read and produce electrical signals in real time as a result of it
>Learn to do this billions of times per second
>You can now communicate with the past
>Depending on the speed of this data transfer process you can have entire video conversations even with the past
>The reason we haven't met any time travelers is because we've never learned how to observe the right quantum particles being sent to us from the future
Is sending a single quantum particle to the past the single most important scientific question there is?
Anonymous at Mon, 9 Sep 2024 07:04:35 UTC No. 16369330
Doesn't that scenario imply that the interpreter would be needed before you'd be able to receive signals from the future? Instead, you'd expect to receive a deluge of signals from the future as soon as the interpreter is built, but not before, since it would be impossible.
Anonymous at Mon, 9 Sep 2024 07:14:29 UTC No. 16369340
>>16369330
Yes? I'm not sure I'm following. You build the interpreter and then design the code. Then in the future you attempt to send back the message of quantum particles. I guess you'd know in advance if it was going to work or not.
The first obvious question to me is that there's no way to determine the source in time of the particles you receive. In physical space we can physically block interference. In time, we have no way of preventing people in the future from spamming us with particles to destroy the message.
Secondly, assuming you get the stream of quantum particles from the future and measure them, there's the question of whether you actually decide to send them or not. If you have the free will to not do it, then where did the particles come from? It breaks thermodynamics because energy would have come from nothing.
So does that mean that sending a quantum particle back in time is just impossible?
Anonymous at Mon, 9 Sep 2024 07:25:16 UTC No. 16369346
>>16369281
Yes, that child is a grown woman now, you pedo.
Anonymous at Mon, 9 Sep 2024 08:46:33 UTC No. 16369389
>>16369281
>quantum particle
kek
Anonymous at Mon, 9 Sep 2024 09:22:42 UTC No. 16369418
>>16369281
Shut the fuck up, retard
Anonymous at Tue, 10 Sep 2024 13:25:56 UTC No. 16372168
>>16369281
>enters science board
>posts a bunch of unscientific schizo pseud talk
Why
Anonymous at Tue, 10 Sep 2024 14:06:33 UTC No. 16372229
>Send quantum
Stopped there.
Anonymous at Tue, 10 Sep 2024 15:20:12 UTC No. 16372338
>>16369281
And how does one "send a particle back in time," exactly?
Anonymous at Tue, 10 Sep 2024 15:37:55 UTC No. 16372369
>>16369389
You never heard of the the quanternion?
Anonymous at Tue, 10 Sep 2024 15:39:42 UTC No. 16372373
>>16372338
Just do it
Anonymous at Tue, 10 Sep 2024 15:48:33 UTC No. 16372388
>>16372369
I mostly work with quaternions, sorry