🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Mon, 9 Sep 2024 17:00:54 UTC No. 16369964
Virginijus Šikšnys is a Lithuanian biochemist and a professor at Vilnius University. He is a chief scientist at the Vilnius University Institute of Biotechnology.
He developed gene editing method a month before Jennifer Doudna and Emmanuelle Charpentier on the bottom, but unlike them Virginijus Šikšnys didn't get nobel Prize for his work.
Because these women had more tight connections with academic sphere and their work was not even reviewed but Šikšnys's work was rejected for no reason
>Since 2007 Šikšnys focused on mechanistic studies of CRISPR-Cas, the newly discovered bacterial antiviral systems, and was among the first to demonstrate programmable DNA cleavage by the Cas9 protein.
>According to Šikšnys, his article was not even considered as serious by the editor board of the academic journal and was not sent to the reviewers, therefore the time needed to be recognized as first was lost.
>Martin Schlak reported that Šikšnys submitted his article describing DNA cleavage by Cas9 to Cell Reports on 18 April 2012. After its rejection without peer review, he sent it to PNAS one month later, and it took several months for review and publication. In the meantime, Jennifer Doudna and Emmanuelle Charpentier had published their findings in Science where their findings were reviewed and accepted within two weeks.
Also after some time there was a report that shared some money from nobel prize, It looks like he was paid to keep quiet
Anonymous at Mon, 9 Sep 2024 17:23:25 UTC No. 16369999
>>16369964
Are you a lithuanian by any chance?
Anonymous at Mon, 9 Sep 2024 17:29:39 UTC No. 16370007
>>16369964
The Japanese guy who discovered the CRISPR mechanism in bacteria in the first place also didn't get any recognition.
Anonymous at Mon, 9 Sep 2024 17:39:07 UTC No. 16370024
>>16369964
Honestly, who cares? This is all just soft sciences nonsense. Give the discovery credit to the women, it's Biology nobody cares.
Anonymous at Mon, 9 Sep 2024 17:42:50 UTC No. 16370034
>>16370024
>soft sciences
>Microbiology
Anonymous at Tue, 10 Sep 2024 04:15:13 UTC No. 16371082
>>16370007
Well, he did a good job but that was ordinary
Anonymous at Wed, 11 Sep 2024 11:42:15 UTC No. 16374059
>>16369999
Why should he be?
Anonymous at Wed, 11 Sep 2024 18:54:52 UTC No. 16374656
>>16370007
Yeah really?
Anonymous at Wed, 11 Sep 2024 18:58:02 UTC No. 16374662
>>16370034
Who is Michael and why do I care about his biology
Anonymous at Wed, 11 Sep 2024 19:04:07 UTC No. 16374671
>>16369964
Why the fuck do all these boomer women shitlib bourgeois academic types always wear these scarves? They all wear these lightweight neckscarves. It's like how they signal to other woke elites and intellectuals that they're not uneducated, anti-science proletarian subhumans. It's like the analog of club belts for boomer women, so you can signal to your peers and flex on the chuds with you sophisticated, bourgeois sense of style.
Anonymous at Wed, 11 Sep 2024 19:12:23 UTC No. 16374684
>>16369964
Imagine calling your son "Virginijus"
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:25:57 UTC No. 16376661
>>16374684
Over from the starte
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 12:22:55 UTC No. 16376840
>>16369964
Did he at least publish a preprint somewhere first?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 19:44:21 UTC No. 16377447
>>16376840
Look at him, his name is literally virgin and he was bullied by two women. You think he would care about it?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 19:51:37 UTC No. 16377452
>>16376840
>Did he at least publish a preprint somewhere first?
That fact that his paper was submitted first is not in dispute.
The funny part is that the peer-reviewer at the journal where he sent it happened to be too stupid to understand the paper, so it was rejected. He submitted it as it was to another journal with someone less retarded, but by then it was too late, of course.
So his groundbreaking paper lost because of a peer referee who was probably only on staff to check a quota box.
🗑️ Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 20:24:41 UTC No. 16377499
>>16369964
>wut how do all these jews have so many contributions
kek
🗑️ Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 19:01:57 UTC No. 16378991
>>16377499
None of them are Jewish though
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 21:12:14 UTC No. 16379152
>>16377452
>ground breaking work
Look, I'm team virgin as much as the next guy, mainly because I worked at the same department under the guy. but quantifying a few CAS proteins isint as significant as describing the higgs field or finding out what DNA does. Everyone and their grandmas dog was working on CAS proteins at the time, not to discredit the work, because it was superb and the whole team was and is very competent (and its basically one of the two departments that carry the whole institute) but god damn dude, touch some fucking grass and take some lithium salts.
Are the nobels political, yes they are, did the cunts deserve a nobel, maybe kinda, they did groundbreaking work as well, point is everything in life is shit, except piss, the department burns through honors students by working them to the bone like toilet paper during cholera for example.
Suck it up nigger, also if you are spamming Virginijus, get some psychological help before you go for the high score in LSC.
Anonymous at Sat, 14 Sep 2024 00:47:18 UTC No. 16379387
>>16369964
niekada nesulaukiame pripazinimo kurio esame nusipelne..
Anonymous at Sat, 14 Sep 2024 04:38:16 UTC No. 16379591
>>16379152
>I don't want to discredit his work and I'm on his team
>Cunts deserve nobel and his work isn't as significant
Anonymous at Sat, 14 Sep 2024 18:39:48 UTC No. 16380439
>>16374671
Evil love style
Anonymous at Sun, 15 Sep 2024 07:26:09 UTC No. 16381462
>>16379387
Seems like op cares more about women part than the Lithuanian part
Anonymous at Sun, 15 Sep 2024 12:36:52 UTC No. 16381776
>>16379152
>GUISE I TOTALLY WORKED WITH HIM.
Everyone believes you.
🗑️ Anonymous at Mon, 16 Sep 2024 03:41:59 UTC No. 16382634
>>16377499
Krk
DoctorGreen !DRgReeNusk at Mon, 16 Sep 2024 09:11:01 UTC No. 16382830
>>16377452
>the peer-reviewer at the journal where he sent it happened to be too stupid to understand the paper, so it was rejected. He submitted it as it was to another journal with someone less retarded, but by then it was too late, of course.
interesting
of course i need you to submit the paper that explains why or how the first reviewers were indeed retarded just to be clear
Anonymous at Mon, 16 Sep 2024 19:49:46 UTC No. 16383732
>>16370034
you are right, that's not soft science but outright gooey.
Anonymous at Mon, 16 Sep 2024 20:33:44 UTC No. 16383782
>>16383732
You dont have any clue about what are you talking about
Anonymous at Tue, 17 Sep 2024 00:02:13 UTC No. 16383964
>>16370024
Jeet detected
🗑️ Anonymous at Tue, 17 Sep 2024 00:34:33 UTC No. 16383990
>>16374671
from the thumbnail i thought that was the jeopardy tranny
Anonymous at Tue, 17 Sep 2024 01:29:04 UTC No. 16384031
>>16379152
>everything in life is shit, except piss
Pure wisdom.
🗑️ Anonymous at Tue, 17 Sep 2024 16:25:34 UTC No. 16384797
Can i get pussy?
🗑️ Anonymous at Tue, 17 Sep 2024 19:41:42 UTC No. 16384999
>>16369964
Jewish award, who cares. Jew Kissinger was given nobel peace prize after genociding 3 million men women and children
Anonymous at Tue, 17 Sep 2024 21:24:42 UTC No. 16385120
>>16369964
Yes, that is what academic snobbism is - you can do top-tier work, be first to make the actual discovery and still be overlooked while publishing just because you are from a 3rd tier institution while someone from a high-tier institution can get into a prestigious journal with almost immediately.
Yes, he was snubbed for the Nobel.
No, it is not fair.
Yes, we just have to accept it, as there is no fighting the system and all of its biases that is orders of magnitude more powerful than any individual or even an institution. For everyone who was awarder there are 10 people whose work was just as groundbreaking but they received no recognition due to snobbism and politics.
Yes, I am Lithuanian.
No, I did not work with this guy nor do I know him personally.
You may continue to be mad
Anonymous at Tue, 17 Sep 2024 21:25:46 UTC No. 16385124
>>16379387
Deja
Anonymous at Wed, 18 Sep 2024 07:25:59 UTC No. 16385788
>>16384999
*Scandinavian, nordic
Anonymous at Wed, 18 Sep 2024 17:46:09 UTC No. 16386289
>>16369964
can you link what you are quoting?
Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 06:07:19 UTC No. 16387159
>>16386289
It's probably his wiki page
🗑️ Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 18:49:55 UTC No. 16388073
Fuck women
Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 16:25:57 UTC No. 16389662
>>16385120
Do you wanna kys,
🗑️ Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 20:14:58 UTC No. 16390010
>>16369964
>Virginijus Šikšnys didn't get nobel Prize for his work.
>Because these women had more tight connections with academic sphere
Jews use their connections to nominate and reward their own tribe too. It's why they're so overrepresented among Nobel winners.
🗑️ Anonymous at Sat, 21 Sep 2024 18:30:48 UTC No. 16391683
Women being women
Anonymous at Sat, 21 Sep 2024 18:43:37 UTC No. 16391705
>>16369964
He is white but kind of swarthy and not chad looking, of course society at large will ignore such a man.
Anonymous at Sat, 21 Sep 2024 18:48:16 UTC No. 16391709
>>16391705
he's a scientist, what do you expect him to look like?
Anonymous at Sat, 21 Sep 2024 18:51:46 UTC No. 16391716
>>16391705
In what world he is considered swarthy? He looks deadpale
Anonymous at Sun, 22 Sep 2024 09:44:30 UTC No. 16392645
>>16391709
Like gay faggot
Anonymous at Mon, 23 Sep 2024 02:59:19 UTC No. 16394059
>>16370024
Indian retard
Anonymous at Mon, 23 Sep 2024 03:46:11 UTC No. 16394093
>>16379152
I believe you. However, what he or you or the woman did wasn't very impressive. I can only imagine leading as easy of lives as all of you have had it and can't relate one bit to your world.
Anonymous at Mon, 23 Sep 2024 04:59:28 UTC No. 16394161
>>16394093
>worthy of a Nobel
>wasn't very impressive
pick one
Anonymous at Mon, 23 Sep 2024 16:24:31 UTC No. 16394816
>>16394161
>programmable DNA cleavage by the Cas9 protein.
Not that impressive. An upper midwit can achieve this provided he has a nice stable job, can eat without worrying about breaking the bank, no major expenses, and having resources and bitchboy helpers like you helps considerably. Time, money, no stress, doing something your interested in, you can achieve a lot. He has it easy.
Anonymous at Mon, 23 Sep 2024 16:37:33 UTC No. 16394843
>>16394816
Imagine how easier it was for women considering the level of their bitchboys in prestigious western facilities whose bitchboy's effort they equalated to girl power
Anonymous at Mon, 23 Sep 2024 17:04:12 UTC No. 16394885
>>16394816
I would like to see you do anything of that scale by yourself. Given by how you speak, I think you are probably some armchair "specialist"
Anonymous at Tue, 24 Sep 2024 06:28:51 UTC No. 16395857
Women moments of history
Anonymous at Tue, 24 Sep 2024 18:41:18 UTC No. 16396573
They should be beaten
Anonymous at Wed, 25 Sep 2024 18:58:40 UTC No. 16397765
>>16370024
Poo.
Anonymous at Wed, 25 Sep 2024 19:01:02 UTC No. 16397766
Anonymous at Thu, 26 Sep 2024 04:36:50 UTC No. 16398448
Anonymous at Thu, 26 Sep 2024 06:36:37 UTC No. 16398536
>>16374671
They are old, fat and have double chins and weird wart ridden saggy wrinkled turkey necks to hide.
Anonymous at Thu, 26 Sep 2024 09:08:04 UTC No. 16398605
>>16394885
Yet you have no real defense or counter to the criticism. 'I would like you see you try' is something that low IQ blue collar people would levy (which would have been a more fitting station for you in life). The other, is simply tone policing that you have learned from the prissy scarf women. The only thing you managed to demonstrate with this outburst is that you are not as intelligent as I am. To address it, I lack the background, the time, and the money. If I had sufficient capital, where I would no longer need to work, and was paid, I would call your bluff and within two years would surpass the professor and his malcontents.
Anonymous at Thu, 26 Sep 2024 09:58:39 UTC No. 16398644
>>16379152
>did the cunts deserve a nobel, maybe kinda
What happened to "quantifying a few CAS proteins isint as significant " and why did you ignore it as soon as you had a couple of cunts to appeal to?
Anonymous at Thu, 26 Sep 2024 10:21:19 UTC No. 16398654
>>16398605
>'I would like you see you try' is something that low IQ blue collar people would levy
Only against other even lower IQ blue collar people who say even stupider shit like "Its pretty easy to revolutionize science if you just get a nice stable job, so you don't have to worry about money".
Anonymous at Thu, 26 Sep 2024 16:30:18 UTC No. 16398941
>>16398654
Completely agree.
Not to mention a top-notch lab with all the infrastructure in place along with research assistants who are motivated to help me and are highly qualified in a specialized sub-field.
Yeah, given all that, making substantial contributions to any field is pretty easy.
I guess that is why all those MIT, Stanford and Cambridge PIs leading research groups make these contributions in the first place - not because they are inherently more knowledgeable or skilled (which they MIGHT be), but simply because they are given ALL the means to do so
Anonymous at Thu, 26 Sep 2024 16:34:36 UTC No. 16398943
>>16398605
>I can do anything, just don't have the means
Suure
Anonymous at Thu, 26 Sep 2024 18:57:40 UTC No. 16399075
>>16398941
Therefore this dude's contribution is amazing. He did all of it without resources these women have, and made it before them
Anonymous at Thu, 26 Sep 2024 19:20:20 UTC No. 16399093
>>16399075
yes, and he got snubbed for the Nobel for all his hard work, just because he was not from a prestigious institution, even though he was first to make the discovery
Anonymous at Thu, 26 Sep 2024 19:29:04 UTC No. 16399096
>>16399093
when the current establishment falls, his name will be remembered
Anonymous at Thu, 26 Sep 2024 19:59:40 UTC No. 16399123
>>16399096
I doubt that will happen in our lifetime, if ever
Anonymous at Sat, 28 Sep 2024 06:13:33 UTC No. 16400720
>>16399123
World is a rapidly changing system
Anonymous at Sat, 28 Sep 2024 08:42:00 UTC No. 16400777
>>16400720
true, but people tend to overestimate how fast things progress in the short term
Anonymous at Sat, 28 Sep 2024 14:23:11 UTC No. 16401000
>>16400777
As they underestimate the vice versa scenario
Anonymous at Sun, 29 Sep 2024 09:39:25 UTC No. 16402044
bump for (mostly) quality discussion
Anonymous at Sun, 29 Sep 2024 14:56:06 UTC No. 16402308
>>16374671
Hides the neck waddles
Anonymous at Mon, 30 Sep 2024 10:41:35 UTC No. 16403561
>>16374671
They are the turkey
Anonymous at Tue, 1 Oct 2024 02:08:17 UTC No. 16404594
bump for boredom
Anonymous at Tue, 1 Oct 2024 05:57:02 UTC No. 16404788
>>16370024
Kill yourself rajesh
Anonymous at Tue, 1 Oct 2024 19:34:09 UTC No. 16405477
Maybe we should force him as a meme?
Anonymous at Tue, 1 Oct 2024 19:36:14 UTC No. 16405479
>>16405477
how does that work?
Anonymous at Wed, 2 Oct 2024 12:26:56 UTC No. 16406345
>>16405479
Well, anons always know how to do stuff like that. We can make a meme from his name (literally virgin) and that Lithuanians kill themselves
Anonymous at Wed, 2 Oct 2024 18:38:00 UTC No. 16406689
>>16406345
sounds mean spirited
Anonymous at Wed, 2 Oct 2024 19:00:43 UTC No. 16406705
>>16406689
Do you have some other ideas?
Anonymous at Wed, 2 Oct 2024 20:07:01 UTC No. 16406759
>>16406705
I think the time for this has passed - the time for outrage and some sort of campaign was immediately after the Nobel was announced that year - now it has largely faded into obscurity (aside from this basket weaving forum that is).
Also, at least he did not end up with nothing - he got the Kavli prize in nanotechnology
Anonymous at Thu, 3 Oct 2024 05:51:03 UTC No. 16407298
>>16406759
Well, this basket forum can make anything with enough determination though. And the problem of gynocentrical academia is very important and big right now
Anonymous at Thu, 3 Oct 2024 15:21:10 UTC No. 16407672
>>16407298
both statements are true. If you think you have a decent shot, go for it
Anonymous at Thu, 3 Oct 2024 17:07:51 UTC No. 16407784
>>16407672
But do you have passion about it?
Anonymous at Thu, 3 Oct 2024 18:23:00 UTC No. 16407884
>>16407784
not really
Anonymous at Fri, 4 Oct 2024 03:26:09 UTC No. 16408423
>>16397766
Pajeet
Anonymous at Fri, 4 Oct 2024 16:58:39 UTC No. 16409545
>>16407884
Why? Would be interesting
Anonymous at Fri, 4 Oct 2024 18:52:28 UTC No. 16409729
>>16374671
They're all into choking and autoerotic asphyxiation - the scarves hide the bruises
Anonymous at Sat, 5 Oct 2024 10:23:50 UTC No. 16410395
>>16374671
Evil loves style
Anonymous at Sun, 6 Oct 2024 19:36:28 UTC No. 16412812
>>16383732
Rajesh
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 09:07:44 UTC No. 16413711
>>16395857
Curie is also fake
Anonymous at Mon, 7 Oct 2024 18:35:53 UTC No. 16414401
>>16413711
was not
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 03:22:23 UTC No. 16415057
>>16414401
Was.
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 05:34:16 UTC No. 16415144
>>16415057
proof?
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 15:21:23 UTC No. 16415798
>>16415144
name me 1(one) formula that was made by marie instead of pierre
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 16:14:22 UTC No. 16415845
>>16415798
easy - every formula
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 16:36:30 UTC No. 16415861
>>16415845
>every formula
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 17:36:21 UTC No. 16415955
>>16415845
>>16415861
based
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 20:43:21 UTC No. 16416279
>Also after some time there was a report that shared some money from nobel prize, It looks like he was paid to keep quiet
Link for this?
Anonymous at Tue, 8 Oct 2024 21:01:30 UTC No. 16416310
>>16369964
>Wah-wah-wah
The Global Wahmbulance Service is Temporarily Overwhelmed. Please try again later.
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 11:06:49 UTC No. 16417303
>>16416310
Kys
Anonymous at Wed, 9 Oct 2024 13:54:04 UTC No. 16417468
>>16417303
>Wah-wah-wah
Brilliant.
Anonymous at Thu, 10 Oct 2024 05:01:51 UTC No. 16418672
>>16417468
You can't talk normally aren't you
Anonymous at Fri, 11 Oct 2024 13:27:22 UTC No. 16420926
>>16415845
Lies
Anonymous at Fri, 11 Oct 2024 14:27:07 UTC No. 16421016
>>16418672
>You can't talk normally aren't you
Classic.
Anonymous at Fri, 11 Oct 2024 15:27:14 UTC No. 16421088
>>16370007
yea and no one talks about rasiRNA despite two nobel prizes are now directly related with its research. Argonaut proteins can be programmed the same way as gRNAs in cas9 on a transcriptional level (while also being self-amplifying in the germline) but miRNA takes the cake because hairpins are simple to use in knockdowns.
it's a humbug, but malding won't solve that issue. there's massive teams looking at reprogramming these systems nowadays, so I don't really give a fuck.
Anonymous at Fri, 11 Oct 2024 18:24:24 UTC No. 16421358
>>16421016
Classic my ass
Anonymous at Fri, 11 Oct 2024 18:37:11 UTC No. 16421379
>>16370007
He wasn't gay enough
Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 13:37:06 UTC No. 16422723
>>16421379
This guy looks gay?
Anonymous at Sat, 12 Oct 2024 21:49:03 UTC No. 16423613
>>16409729
this but unironically
Anonymous at Sun, 13 Oct 2024 12:16:28 UTC No. 16425649
>>16370024
Man, you're a tard who's never folded proteins. Molecular gen/biochem have a higher male-to-female ratio than chemcuckery and physics. Keep copin' shitsin!
>>16397766
Indian
sage at Sun, 13 Oct 2024 16:38:48 UTC No. 16428629
>almost half of the replies have 5 words or less
very organic
Anonymous at Sun, 13 Oct 2024 18:21:51 UTC No. 16429000
>>16421088
Because he can't fuck around and get everything as these fucking whores
Anonymous at Sun, 13 Oct 2024 22:25:26 UTC No. 16429625
>>16374671
they're nooses. it's a jungian response to being a fucking worthless fraud getting by because you have a dried up pussy between your cellulite-ridden legs, you subconsciously put a noose around your neck.
Anonymous at Mon, 14 Oct 2024 09:29:53 UTC No. 16430555
>>16428629
Seems like you are newbie
Anonymous at Tue, 15 Oct 2024 08:09:20 UTC No. 16432545
>>16370024
Why are paeets so idiotic? It's kn their dna?
Anonymous at Wed, 16 Oct 2024 10:16:56 UTC No. 16434146
>>16415955
Based only in your small brain. Midwit
Anonymous at Wed, 16 Oct 2024 16:00:26 UTC No. 16434565
>>16369964
>Virginijus Šikšnys
That sounds like a very common condition on /sci/
Anonymous at Wed, 16 Oct 2024 16:03:13 UTC No. 16434567
>>16434565
I don't think this place is so much virgin
Anonymous at Thu, 17 Oct 2024 07:18:31 UTC No. 16435906
>>16434567
>He doesn't know
Anonymous at Thu, 17 Oct 2024 18:14:14 UTC No. 16436686
>>16415798
The most retarded comment I've seen for awhile
Anonymous at Fri, 18 Oct 2024 17:32:22 UTC No. 16438298
>>16434565
Virgin bros...
Anonymous at Fri, 18 Oct 2024 21:01:29 UTC No. 16438621
>>16438298
Not like this
Anonymous at Sat, 19 Oct 2024 18:11:15 UTC No. 16440080
>>16369964
12 months.
Anonymous at Sat, 19 Oct 2024 19:10:11 UTC No. 16440190
>>16440080
What 12 months?
Captcha GMRNA
Anonymous at Sat, 19 Oct 2024 21:21:52 UTC No. 16440338
>>16369964
There is so much controversy with so many Nobel prizes that at some point and adult male just has to accept that they are bullshit.
Anonymous at Sun, 20 Oct 2024 06:10:53 UTC No. 16440839
>>16440338
But there was no controversy, people didn't care and accepted feminism dogma
Anonymous at Sun, 20 Oct 2024 07:46:19 UTC No. 16440899
>>16440338
unfortunately, you are right
Anonymous at Sun, 20 Oct 2024 07:47:20 UTC No. 16440901
>>16440839
normies are getting indoctrinated, what can you do
Anonymous at Mon, 21 Oct 2024 03:21:47 UTC No. 16442100
>>16440338
What controversies except this and lobotomy were in scientific nobel?
Anonymous at Tue, 22 Oct 2024 10:26:10 UTC No. 16443901
>>16440901
Normies are the worst
Anonymous at Tue, 22 Oct 2024 16:25:22 UTC No. 16444294
>>16443901
And yet, they are the reason society functions
Anonymous at Wed, 23 Oct 2024 04:00:55 UTC No. 16445274
>>16444294
Elaborate?
Anonymous at Wed, 23 Oct 2024 07:31:59 UTC No. 16445429
>>16445274
They do all the normal jobs the economy needs, thus creating value, some of which can be redistributed to serve the needs of society including infrastructure, healthcare, education, science, etc
Anonymous at Wed, 23 Oct 2024 16:49:59 UTC No. 16445964
>>16445429
Normies mostly work on fake jobs, real shit is done by nerds and chads
Anonymous at Wed, 23 Oct 2024 17:08:32 UTC No. 16445995
>>16445964
No - there are not enough of them (even combined) to pull the economy
Anonymous at Thu, 24 Oct 2024 07:54:51 UTC No. 16446895
>>16445995
Their jobs are fake, they are not essential for economy, their effort is pointless
Anonymous at Thu, 24 Oct 2024 14:53:29 UTC No. 16447228
>>16446895
Tell me which jobs are fake then
Anonymous at Thu, 24 Oct 2024 19:09:45 UTC No. 16447707
>>16447228
>Almost all jobs related to bureaucracy
>Jobs related to maintain this bureaucracy
>Half of personal in highly producing jobs, because most job is done by nerds, and normies do mostly harm
Anonymous at Fri, 25 Oct 2024 04:54:42 UTC No. 16448417
>>16447228
>>16447707
Also forgot: women in science works
Anonymous at Sat, 26 Oct 2024 09:45:48 UTC No. 16450256
>>16369964
12 months
Anonymous at Sat, 26 Oct 2024 14:07:11 UTC No. 16450593
>>16450256
What do you mean? Elaborate
Anonymous at Sat, 26 Oct 2024 20:13:02 UTC No. 16451152
>>16445964
>>16447707
>>16448417
Essentially all jobs in construction, industry, medicine, law, retail, advertising, sales - are done by normies, not nerds or chads
Anonymous at Sun, 27 Oct 2024 11:51:31 UTC No. 16451994
>>16451152
>law, retail, advertising, sales
Already almost replaced
>construction, industry, medicine
Not only normies
Anonymous at Sun, 27 Oct 2024 12:07:21 UTC No. 16452006
>>16451994
>Already almost replaced
Replaced by what? IA? Anyone who has used ChatGPT or any other AI knows it is a far cry from an actual professional
>Not only normies
Mostly normies
Anonymous at Mon, 28 Oct 2024 01:56:18 UTC No. 16453095
>>16452006
>Mostly normies
Ther wouldn't be a need for so many normies for these occupations if there wouldn't be normies
Anonymous at Mon, 28 Oct 2024 06:21:36 UTC No. 16453265
>>16453095
There would be no need for the economy if there were no humans
Anonymous at Mon, 28 Oct 2024 08:32:19 UTC No. 16453345
>>16453265
*No useless humans
Anonymous at Mon, 28 Oct 2024 12:47:07 UTC No. 16453457
>>16453265
Only non normies deserve life
Anonymous at Mon, 28 Oct 2024 18:15:23 UTC No. 16453835
>>16369964
Fyi DuPont (huge chem multinational) got some licenses for some of this CRISPR-Cas9 tech.
>>16413711
>Curie is also fake
Isn't she known for having discovered an element? I recall reading they were extracting radioactive stuff and when it was all extracted she realized something radioactive was still in the rock or whatever. So they looked and indeed there was something else. A few days later they presented the findings. I'm no chemist/biologist/etc but she's the only one I can name who discovered an element. For men the bar for fame is set a lot higher.
Anonymous at Tue, 29 Oct 2024 06:24:41 UTC No. 16454518
>>16453835
Females love megacorps
Anonymous at Wed, 30 Oct 2024 04:07:21 UTC No. 16455584
>>16453835
>Isn't she known for having discovered an element
She "discovered" it as a lab technician for her husband
Anonymous at Thu, 31 Oct 2024 17:50:14 UTC No. 16457226
>>16369964
say 12 months in estonian.
Anonymous at Fri, 1 Nov 2024 04:41:34 UTC No. 16457783
>>16415845
Why are you so retarded?
Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 03:49:54 UTC No. 16459274
>>16457226
Elobarate already
Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 20:10:18 UTC No. 16459979
>>16453835
Is dupont an evil organisation?
Anonymous at Sat, 2 Nov 2024 20:22:42 UTC No. 16459989
>>16459979
They do pollute the environment, so yes. Then again, so do all manufacturers
Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 12:39:41 UTC No. 16460837
>>16451152
You have no idea what you are talking about. You should kill yourself normalfag
Anonymous at Sun, 3 Nov 2024 12:50:54 UTC No. 16460842
>>16460837
no, you don't have any idea what you are talking about. Normies are 90% of all people, hence essential for the economy in every way
Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 07:10:04 UTC No. 16461868
>>16460842
Only for normies, if normies are gone then there is no economic bloat
Anonymous at Mon, 4 Nov 2024 16:16:53 UTC No. 16462275
>>16461868
Define the "bloat". What is it - construction, healthcare, energy, transportation, tech?
Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 08:41:44 UTC No. 16463295
>>16462275
>Define the "bloat". What is it - construction, healthcare, energy, transportation, tech?
Excessive production of these goods for normies
Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 16:33:43 UTC No. 16463744
>>16463295
And what counts as "excessive"?
Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 17:26:38 UTC No. 16463815
>>16463744
Production that is meant to serve normies
Anonymous at Tue, 5 Nov 2024 20:07:10 UTC No. 16464022
>>16463815
circular reasoning detected - you are a bot
Anonymous at Wed, 6 Nov 2024 19:02:29 UTC No. 16465232
>>16464022
No normies = no need for production for them.
Production for normies = useless
Try to use buzzwords in other places. Maybe on lit, normie
Anonymous at Wed, 6 Nov 2024 19:04:13 UTC No. 16465236
>>16465232
I farted.
Anonymous at Thu, 7 Nov 2024 08:33:18 UTC No. 16465860
>>16465236
Fart with your pseudo logical fallacies in other places
Anonymous at Fri, 8 Nov 2024 15:43:58 UTC No. 16467248
>>16379152
>the department burns through honors students by working them to the bone like toilet paper during cholera
never go to work for academia, thats my life motto
Anonymous at Fri, 8 Nov 2024 16:46:52 UTC No. 16467299
>>16467248
why do you think industry is any better
Anonymous at Sat, 9 Nov 2024 12:58:49 UTC No. 16468237
>>16467299
At least they pay more
Anonymous at Sat, 9 Nov 2024 14:26:39 UTC No. 16468288
>>16468237
probably the only saving grace
Anonymous at Sat, 9 Nov 2024 15:20:53 UTC No. 16468329
>>16369964
why isn't this known to the public?
Anonymous at Sat, 9 Nov 2024 16:32:00 UTC No. 16468387
>>16468329
It is very known in Lithuania. In the US and other western countries people just don't care about it, because its these big rich countries that "keep on winning" - they were not hurt by this
Anonymous at Sat, 9 Nov 2024 18:22:03 UTC No. 16468484
>>16468387
Can you add some information about this story?
Anonymous at Sat, 9 Nov 2024 20:12:44 UTC No. 16468665
>>16468484
The broadstrokes are presented by OP.
Here are some sources in Lithuanian (use google translate on the website)
1) https://www.delfi.lt/mokslas/moksla
2) https://www.delfi.lt/mokslas/moksla
Anonymous at Sun, 10 Nov 2024 12:36:58 UTC No. 16469540
>>16468665
Why non Lithuanians don't talk about it? Maybe he us fake?
Anonymous at Sun, 10 Nov 2024 12:56:46 UTC No. 16469553
>>16469540
>he is
*He is
Anonymous at Sun, 10 Nov 2024 15:47:11 UTC No. 16469683
>>16469540
Because they don't care about Lithuania. Most of them probably cant even put us on the fucking map correctly because we are a small post soviet shithole
Anonymous at Mon, 11 Nov 2024 04:33:13 UTC No. 16470423
>>16469683
R u mad? R u biologist?
Anonymous at Mon, 11 Nov 2024 05:21:45 UTC No. 16470450
>>16470423
a bit mad, but not a biologist
Anonymous at Mon, 11 Nov 2024 19:21:43 UTC No. 16471160
>>16424289
This
Anonymous at Mon, 11 Nov 2024 20:49:36 UTC No. 16471237
>>16369964
That's just Fabio Fazio, you infidel blaspbemer
Mogul Boldi will claim your flesh
Anonymous at Tue, 12 Nov 2024 17:12:16 UTC No. 16472094
>>16471237
>That's just Fabio Fazio
What
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Nov 2024 16:26:50 UTC No. 16473506
>>16468665
This is really suspicious that only shituanians care about this so called discovery
Anonymous at Wed, 13 Nov 2024 17:17:43 UTC No. 16473557
>>16473506
They care about not getting recognition for the discovery, dumbass
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Nov 2024 14:46:50 UTC No. 16474811
>>16473557
If this was so big, westerners probably would do something about it
Anonymous at Thu, 14 Nov 2024 16:02:11 UTC No. 16474891
>>16474811
What for? They were not the ones hurt by this
Anonymous at Fri, 15 Nov 2024 15:53:21 UTC No. 16476312
>>16474891
Russians also always claim something
Anonymous at Fri, 15 Nov 2024 20:10:18 UTC No. 16476735
>>16476312
makes no sense
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 11:17:33 UTC No. 16477688
>>16476735
It actually makes, ee people are always claiming something
Anonymous at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 19:42:07 UTC No. 16478096
>>16374671
Evil trait
Anonymous at Sun, 17 Nov 2024 14:50:35 UTC No. 16478997
>>16453835
Oy vey
Anonymous at Mon, 18 Nov 2024 07:21:36 UTC No. 16480317
>>16465236
Most valuable thing you could ever do
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 04:33:10 UTC No. 16481727
>>16413711
This
Anonymous at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 19:38:57 UTC No. 16482969
>>16369964
It shows that women should not be part of academia
Anonymous at Wed, 20 Nov 2024 10:02:16 UTC No. 16486070
Women are just stupid animals