raphael at Tue, 10 Sep 2024 19:55:44 UTC No. 16372972
>>16372770
0 isnt a number
Anonymous at Tue, 10 Sep 2024 19:57:16 UTC No. 16372980
Anonymous at Tue, 10 Sep 2024 19:57:21 UTC No. 16372981
>>16372770
Mine didn't do that. Instead it started talking to me
Anonymous at Tue, 10 Sep 2024 20:45:40 UTC No. 16373089
All computable functions from the computable reals to the computable reals are continuous. If your calculator reports an answer for 0^0, either the calculator noticed that the second 0 is rational (easy to do if you just type in "0", so check what happens if you put in something like tan(80 degrees) - tan(70 degrees) - tan(60 degrees) - tan(50 degrees)), or its calculations are wrong in some way. Most likely the second.
Anonymous at Tue, 10 Sep 2024 21:01:59 UTC No. 16373125
>>16372770
Input 6,000,000 / 365
Anonymous at Tue, 10 Sep 2024 21:12:28 UTC No. 16373158
See how your calculator does on
[math]\sqrt{1.004} - 3\sqrt{1.003} + 3\sqrt{1.002} - \sqrt{1.001}[/math].
Anonymous at Tue, 10 Sep 2024 23:53:35 UTC No. 16373426
Anonymous at Wed, 11 Sep 2024 00:08:17 UTC No. 16373442
>>16372980
>>16372981
Bugged code, it should be 1. Simple as.
Anonymous at Wed, 11 Sep 2024 00:22:41 UTC No. 16373464
Anonymous at Wed, 11 Sep 2024 00:29:36 UTC No. 16373478
>>16373464
>>16373158
wait, you said plus
Anonymous at Wed, 11 Sep 2024 02:35:54 UTC No. 16373577
>>16373426
not an argument
Anonymous at Wed, 11 Sep 2024 05:22:16 UTC No. 16373722
>>16373577
It has to be according to your logic where 0 argument is impossible.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 07:03:26 UTC No. 16375643
Another 0 basic math thread. This is the lowest quality post ive ever seen
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 07:30:43 UTC No. 16375695
>>16375643
so then why? also, thanks for the page ten bump.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 07:34:29 UTC No. 16375699
>>16375695
Because 0!=1, so there is exactly 1 way to order 0 objects.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 07:43:23 UTC No. 16375709
>>16375695
Youre welcome?