Anonymous at Wed, 11 Sep 2024 03:31:37 UTC No. 16373624

>>16373622
It depends on which font you use
111
222
333
444
555
666
777
888
999
000

Anonymous at Wed, 11 Sep 2024 03:31:59 UTC No. 16373625

it's actually .001

Anonymous at Wed, 11 Sep 2024 03:32:25 UTC No. 16373626

111 uses the least amount of pixels

Anonymous at Wed, 11 Sep 2024 03:32:48 UTC No. 16373629

Both are incorrect. The question clearly implies that this is a signed hex number.

Anonymous at Wed, 11 Sep 2024 03:37:18 UTC No. 16373635

>>16373624
>>16373625
>>16373626
>>16373629

Bunch of smartass redditniggers ITT

Anonymous at Wed, 11 Sep 2024 03:37:21 UTC No. 16373636

>>16373622
Why not 000
In any base it is equivalent to 0 which is so small is has its own sign

Anonymous at Wed, 11 Sep 2024 03:38:28 UTC No. 16373638

>>16373636
“Nothing” doesn’t have a size

Anonymous at Wed, 11 Sep 2024 03:38:57 UTC No. 16373640

>>16373635
>reddit spacing
thanks for your reddit spaced reddit redditry senor reddit

Anonymous at Wed, 11 Sep 2024 03:39:59 UTC No. 16373641

>>16373638
Who said anything about size

Anonymous at Wed, 11 Sep 2024 03:47:10 UTC No. 16373652

>>16373641
The picture that started this thread

Anonymous at Wed, 11 Sep 2024 03:47:14 UTC No. 16373653

>>16373622
>natural
>negative numbers
Lmao even

Anonymous at Wed, 11 Sep 2024 03:49:40 UTC No. 16373655

>>16373652
Are you retarded?

Anonymous at Wed, 11 Sep 2024 05:44:15 UTC No. 16373742

>>16373622
000

Anonymous at Wed, 11 Sep 2024 05:48:22 UTC No. 16373745

>>16373622
-999 isn't small, it has the largest magnitude possible for 3 digits while heading in the opposite direction.

Anonymous at Wed, 11 Sep 2024 05:50:13 UTC No. 16373748

>>16373622
Keep fucking around and you will get shot in the face.

Anonymous at Wed, 11 Sep 2024 05:57:01 UTC No. 16373760

>>16373625
If the dots don't count as digits, its actually 0.0...1.

Anonymous at Wed, 11 Sep 2024 06:02:21 UTC No. 16373765

>>16373622
-999

Anonymous at Wed, 11 Sep 2024 06:06:32 UTC No. 16373772

>>16373765
>>16373745

Anonymous at Wed, 11 Sep 2024 06:07:14 UTC No. 16373774

>>16373622
-999 isn't smaller than zero, it's the same size. If you point in an empty field and say "hey there's -999 elephants" it means nothing.

Anonymous at Wed, 11 Sep 2024 06:10:18 UTC No. 16373776

>>16373774
Its means there are 999 elephants running away from the field out in some other direction, but still not a small number of elephants.

Anonymous at Wed, 11 Sep 2024 08:17:55 UTC No. 16373854

>>16373622
0.01

Anonymous at Wed, 11 Sep 2024 08:21:51 UTC No. 16373864

>>16373854
>>16373760

Anonymous at Wed, 11 Sep 2024 08:28:04 UTC No. 16373873

The smallesr three digit number is -999 clearly

Anonymous at Wed, 11 Sep 2024 08:30:36 UTC No. 16373878

>>16373864
Thats how you would report a number with 3 accuracy digits

Anonymous at Wed, 11 Sep 2024 08:49:24 UTC No. 16373902

>>16373873
>>16373745

Anonymous at Wed, 11 Sep 2024 09:25:17 UTC No. 16373934

>>16373902
you will never be a logician

Anonymous at Wed, 11 Sep 2024 09:38:50 UTC No. 16373941

>>16373934
something with a magnitude of 999 will never be smaller than the magnitude 0.0...1

Anonymous at Wed, 11 Sep 2024 10:28:26 UTC No. 16373982

>>16373625
The zeroes are not significant. It's 0.00111

Anonymous at Wed, 11 Sep 2024 11:26:45 UTC No. 16374039

>>16373982
So why only have 3 zeros instead of >>16373760?

Anonymous at Wed, 11 Sep 2024 11:27:30 UTC No. 16374041

>>16373622
(-10)e9

Anonymous at Wed, 11 Sep 2024 19:01:31 UTC No. 16374666

>>16373622
[math]
{_{_{_{_{_{_{_{111}}}}}}}}
[/math]

Anonymous at Wed, 11 Sep 2024 19:19:55 UTC No. 16374686

>>16374041
9^(-9^9)

Anonymous at Wed, 11 Sep 2024 19:23:04 UTC No. 16374690

000

Cult of Passion at Wed, 11 Sep 2024 20:22:08 UTC No. 16374789

>>16373622
.001>>16373625
FUCK YO7N!!!!!!

Anonymous at Wed, 11 Sep 2024 20:27:46 UTC No. 16374800

>>16374789
Eat a cat dick

Anonymous at Wed, 11 Sep 2024 20:34:54 UTC No. 16374821

>>16373982
If the zeroes are not sig figs, then it's 0.0...111

Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 01:16:29 UTC No. 16375286

>>16373622
Clearly it's 9^(-9^9) = 2.3357... × 10^-369693100

sage at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 01:33:51 UTC No. 16375303

>>16373641
The absence of something is the least amount of something

Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 01:48:57 UTC No. 16375315

-∞/-∞/-∞? Or -0/-0/-0?

Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 07:20:30 UTC No. 16375678

>>16373622
>You’re not a pseud Redditor who thinks the answer is –999 are you?
No, but what's with the reddit teir meme OP?

Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 23:44:32 UTC No. 16377716

>>16375303
>absence
>amount (implying presence)

Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 23:46:18 UTC No. 16377719

>>16375678
He was assblasted reddit thought it was -999 so he reposted it here

Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 00:22:18 UTC No. 16377777

>>16373622
Nice bait thread op.

Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 02:40:47 UTC No. 16377946

>>16373622
>who thinks the answer is –999
it is though?

Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 03:02:47 UTC No. 16377960

>>16373622
thats a 1 digit number.

the 0s dont count.

Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 09:24:18 UTC No. 16378240

>>16374686
1e(-9e9)

Yevgeniy Pillman at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 09:46:46 UTC No. 16378254

>>16374789
Please take your medication

Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 10:42:28 UTC No. 16378316

>>16373636
>000

THIS. 0.00
Technically this is correct.