🧵 Question about IQ
Anonymous at Wed, 11 Sep 2024 07:32:32 UTC No. 16373813
Why does it have to be normed so that the average person is always 100 and why isnt it static? IQ can evolve over time. A 100 1930 isnt the same as a 100 today. So why isnt it depicted in an absolute scale that can much easier account for these differences?
Anonymous at Wed, 11 Sep 2024 09:06:59 UTC No. 16373920
Yeah its literally retarded. Most beliefs about IQ are unbelievably retarded.
The average IQ a hundred years ago was much lower than it is now and people act as if William Sidis's "250 IQ" is valid. Also IQ is not heavily genetic you can change it. Race and IQ is also retarded even if the 15 points nazi's believed was real it wouldn't directly cause extremely violent behaviour or even be extremely noticeable. They also bump up IQ scores for women but nobody suggests women are as dumb and violent as minorities. Their 100 score which technically may be equivalent to a male 90 is seen as just as valid.
A couple years back I basically considered anyone who took IQ seriously to be mentally retarded for these reasons. Almost everything surrounding IQ is retarded.
raphael at Wed, 11 Sep 2024 15:22:08 UTC No. 16374351
>>16373813
g is fixed
fluid declines 1 point per decade
raphael at Wed, 11 Sep 2024 15:22:57 UTC No. 16374352
>>16373920
then why does it follow the normal distribution retard which is the basis of stats if you sampled everyone in the world it would create a standard normal distribution. if you deny iq you deny math which makes you a blm supporter nigger
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 07:16:15 UTC No. 16375670
>iq thread
shut up man