Anonymous at Wed, 11 Sep 2024 14:43:48 UTC No. 16374299

Everything is exact in nature
>muh uncertain-
no, that at most means you are not allowed to observe it
and for that matter you assume it follows the law exactly

checkmate phd students

Anonymous at Wed, 11 Sep 2024 15:07:51 UTC No. 16374327

>>16374299
Track the path of an electron

Anonymous at Wed, 11 Sep 2024 16:06:20 UTC No. 16374408

>>16374327
Imagine thinking that integrating over all paths with some action means it didn't follow a path.

Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 02:44:11 UTC No. 16375374

>>16374408
that smells like some broglie bohm bullshit talk, homes

Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:23:32 UTC No. 16376642

>>16374285
Time to eat 1.000001 of your meds anon.

Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 13:20:12 UTC No. 16376905

>>16374285
6 000 000 = 300 000 tops
13 / 52 = 100%
9 / 11 = inside job
2 = no. genders
but
0.999... is NOT equal to 1.

Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 16:47:21 UTC No. 16377218

>>16374299
>no, that at most means you are not allowed to observe it

No, it just means that humanity doesn't have the precision tools to measure the exact value. Perfect measurements require perfect scales, simple as.

Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 17:27:01 UTC No. 16377278

>>16374285
The difference is infinity. One one hand, you have a perfect motion that requires no correction, on the other you require unlimited energy to adjust course over every deviation. Why don't you front load the work to make gains?

Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 21:52:15 UTC No. 16377621

Limits, as in calculus, are exact.

Any set of mathematical processes which, when done to 0.999... result in 0.999... , when done to 1 would result in 1. Hence we refer to 0.999... and 1 as mathematically equal. 0.999... is not a limit though, it doesn't approach anything.

Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 23:56:42 UTC No. 16377732

>>16377621
Nonsense.

Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 05:01:33 UTC No. 16378034

>>16374327
You don't even need to invoke invisible particles, track the edge of the ocean, the tide is constantly shifting and as a result, the coastline is impossible to measure.

Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 10:43:48 UTC No. 16378319

>>16378034
just use the average of the coastline during a day

Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 10:47:43 UTC No. 16378322

>>16378319
You can't measure accurately measure it once, let alone many times which would necessitate an average.

Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 11:02:04 UTC No. 16378337

>>16378322
yes i can mesaure it accurately what are you talking about

Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 11:04:35 UTC No. 16378339

>>16378337
No you can't, nobody can, its too amorphous.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coastline_paradox

Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 11:05:53 UTC No. 16378340

>>16378339
>wikipedia

Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 11:10:07 UTC No. 16378344

>>16378340
I accept your concession and retarded inability to use a citation site to check references.