Anonymous at Wed, 11 Sep 2024 16:34:42 UTC No. 16374470

No that is 0 and 1. Those are the fake primes. 2 just happens to be the most based prime because it is an even natural number.

Anonymous at Wed, 11 Sep 2024 16:41:56 UTC No. 16374490

>>16374470
0 and 1 are not prime.

Anonymous at Wed, 11 Sep 2024 16:46:58 UTC No. 16374499

>>16374490
wrong

Anonymous at Wed, 11 Sep 2024 16:49:29 UTC No. 16374505

>>16374467
Get two boosters right now, you are not supposed to be alive.

Anonymous at Wed, 11 Sep 2024 16:59:31 UTC No. 16374522

>>16374499
1 divides every natural number and 0 can be divided by every natural number

Anonymous at Wed, 11 Sep 2024 17:01:48 UTC No. 16374525

>>16374467
2 is the genghis khan of primes half the integers are its rape babies

Anonymous at Wed, 11 Sep 2024 17:52:49 UTC No. 16374591

>>16374525
1 is the Y-DNA Adam of primes.

Anonymous at Wed, 11 Sep 2024 18:24:52 UTC No. 16374625

>>16374522
>assume the conclusion
first time doing math?

Anonymous at Wed, 11 Sep 2024 18:28:13 UTC No. 16374632

>>16374625
yes I'm proud first timer like you, still owned you tho lol

Anonymous at Wed, 11 Sep 2024 18:40:38 UTC No. 16374647

>>16374632
assuming the conclusion is a beginner's fallacy

Anonymous at Wed, 11 Sep 2024 18:45:44 UTC No. 16374650

>>16374647
I know, we are both playing beginner's fallacy and I am rookie of the year dominated you xD

Anonymous at Wed, 11 Sep 2024 22:31:23 UTC No. 16375021

>>16374467
Unironically true, there's a reason 99% of number theory theorems are for odd primes instead of all primes

Anonymous at Wed, 11 Sep 2024 22:37:01 UTC No. 16375037

>>16375021
Yes and the reason is that 2 is smooth af and doesn't need pages and pages of incel headcanon to describe its relationships.