Anonymous at Wed, 11 Sep 2024 23:38:27 UTC No. 16375142

>>16375110
Good luck i suppose.
I would skip trying to learn the script though, that's just a hat on a hat the meat of ithkuil is the sapier-worf hypothesis testing density of the language.

Anonymous at Wed, 11 Sep 2024 23:39:55 UTC No. 16375144

rou aokvyalëi ithkuilö

Anonymous at Wed, 11 Sep 2024 23:45:09 UTC No. 16375155

>>16375142
I will also learn this...

Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 04:34:45 UTC No. 16375477

I'm convinced that to create a conlang that would be a root language (a language that could have a mapping to all other languages) you'd only need infinitives for nouns adjectives verbs subjects and grammar with the grammar infinitive being a lisp. I'm interested in the art aspect, but this is to complicated to use.

Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 04:38:36 UTC No. 16375484

Also the entire subtext of the translations of the language are "I set the woman's hair on fire because she looked me in the eyes after I shot her dog". Which is incredibly fucked up.

Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 05:08:55 UTC No. 16375524

>>16375110
Artificial languages are a waste of time. The purpose of languages is to communicate and to gain information from other people. A language with no speakers is useless. The general idea behind "Ithkuil" is infantile. When I was 10 years old I had a similar idea of creating my own language with a grammar encoding all possible philosophical and linguistic categorizations. I quickly figured out why this is a pointless endeavor though. And you should be able to figure it out, too. Btw, if you want to think and express yourself more philosophically "rigorously" you can already do that in almost every natural language.

>muh Sapir-Whorf
Sapir-Whorf is bullshit and only ever cited by trannies who want to make a case for their pronouns. Whorf has been exposed as a fraudulent scammer.