🗑️ Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 00:54:53 UTC No. 16375250

someone spent tens of thousands of dollars to have that published

Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 08:03:08 UTC No. 16375721

>>16375250
https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/radiology-case-reports/publish/open-access-options

akshually only $550

🗑️ Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 23:51:18 UTC No. 16377724

>>16375202
Trust the science

Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 23:59:40 UTC No. 16377737

>>16375202
hey chatgpt, cut the bullshit and write the fucking paper

Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 13:57:59 UTC No. 16378542

>MDs
this is a fake and gay paid paper in a fake journal that was clearly written by frauds. it has nothing to do with proper publishing.

Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 14:53:17 UTC No. 16378609

>>16378542
>this is a fake and gay paid paper in a fake journal that was clearly written by frauds.

Modern social studies in a nutshell. 90% of the papers published in that field look like they were generated in this postmodern essay generator.

https://www.elsewhere.org/journal/pomo/

🗑️ Anonymous at Sat, 14 Sep 2024 03:26:12 UTC No. 16379525

how did that manage to pass peer review as well as the editing staff at the journal?

Anonymous at Sat, 14 Sep 2024 05:40:10 UTC No. 16379640

>>16379525
>how did that manage to pass peer review as well as the editing staff at the journal?
they also use chatgpt for review

Anonymous at Sat, 14 Sep 2024 08:11:25 UTC No. 16379701

>>16379640

🗑️ Anonymous at Sat, 14 Sep 2024 20:09:29 UTC No. 16380587

imagine you devote your life to doing science and publishing articles and your articles are all published next to a bunch of chatgpt vomit and considered equally important

Anonymous at Sun, 15 Sep 2024 15:41:11 UTC No. 16381992

>>16380587
that's why we need to gate keep what is called "science".
all the trash papers should be put on a "trash" tag on their own webpage. this should work across all devices and platforms.
sociology, psychology, medicine... slop should be put in their own category with a disclaimer that they should not be taken seriously.
only leave the rest of the hard sciences should be called proper science.

🗑️ Anonymous at Mon, 16 Sep 2024 18:17:04 UTC No. 16383585

>>16379525
journals don't make money by not publishing articles, so they publish whatever trash is offered up. the journals will publish anything as long as you're willing to pay their price.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vanity_press

Anonymous at Mon, 16 Sep 2024 22:23:25 UTC No. 16383861

>>16379525
>an Indian pay-to-publish journal
>peer review

🗑️ Anonymous at Wed, 18 Sep 2024 01:23:16 UTC No. 16385475

>>16383585
Newspapers work the same way. If you want an article published, they will publish it, costs a few thousand dollars for big papers like NY Times & Washington Post

Anonymous at Wed, 18 Sep 2024 18:01:15 UTC No. 16386324

>>16375202
In my uni we are encouraged to use AI, especially in research. It pisses me off a lot. When we have a class where we have to do presentations half of the class just read chatgpt nonsense and teachers pretend like it's ok. Literal generation of dependable imbeciles is on the rise.

🗑️ Anonymous at Wed, 18 Sep 2024 18:11:59 UTC No. 16386348

>>16375202
>raneem
>basher
holy kek

Anonymous at Wed, 18 Sep 2024 18:14:10 UTC No. 16386354

>>16375202
>raneem
>ashraf
>mohammad
holy kek

🗑️ Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 01:12:27 UTC No. 16386963

>>16386354

🗑️ Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 19:07:28 UTC No. 16388094

>>16386354

Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 20:39:53 UTC No. 16388208

>>16375202
The best part is how none of the supposedly 8 authors noticed this. I've done enough work of my own to know that every paper with many authors is actually just the work of 1 or two people, but you'd figure someone putting their name down to hog credit would at least read it over.

Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 18:52:23 UTC No. 16389902

>>16388208
>none of the supposedly 8 authors noticed this
none of them exist, their names were ai generated

Anonymous at Fri, 20 Sep 2024 21:31:24 UTC No. 16390213

>>16388208
It's particularly frustrating because I know colleagues, good researchers, who will fucking AGONIZE over the content of their papers - scraping through drafts for weeks looking for anything that might be out of place or could be worded better. And then these kinds of chucklefucks get garbage forced through the pay-to-publish pipeline, slap their name on a bullshit citation, and get hired as doctors, researchers, instructors, etc.