Image not available

536x748

1725845410689193.gif

🧵 Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16375463

Why can't mathematical proofs be developed rationally or algorithmically? Speaking about non-trivial stuff that you win nobel prizes for. Things like solving the 3-body problem. It seems problems of that nature are always handled by someone's intuition for the problem domain, rather than reasoning about it from first principles. Why?

Image not available

1024x1024

abstract black an....jpg

Anonymous No. 16375473

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer-assisted_proof

Anonymous No. 16376870

Cause p doesn't equal NP

Anonymous No. 16376945

>>16376870
Proof?
Also isn't it more about kolmogorov complexity to begin with? P != NP doesn't even apply in all logics.

Anonymous No. 16376957

>>16375463
>Why can't mathematical proofs be developed rationally or algorithmically?
Gödel's incompleteness theorem