🗑️ 🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 15:34:45 UTC No. 16377103
Should scientists be banned from researching certain topics?
🗑️ Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 15:40:04 UTC No. 16377118
Back to your containment board.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 15:48:27 UTC No. 16377134
>>16377118
you can fucking kill yourself
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 15:52:50 UTC No. 16377141
>>16377103
It just doesn't help because our society (government and military) is multiracial so all this is doing is creating division and chaos. In my view the intelligence community is correct to say these narratives are seeded by our adversaries.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 15:54:22 UTC No. 16377144
>>16377141
So certain science should be off limits because it might offend certain people? Wasn't that the exact view of the church during the middle ages?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 15:54:48 UTC No. 16377146
>>16377134
You can't even deny being a /pol/tard. Literally no one cares about your shit opinions.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 15:58:42 UTC No. 16377155
>>16377144
If you're so butthurt about it then why don't you go get your PHD in genetics and spend your own money on bullshit no one cares about so you can *maybe* feel superior to others.
You've already made up your mind what the results are going to be because you're fucking retarded.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 16:00:40 UTC No. 16377157
>>16377155
Justify which data should be censored. Realize that such a justification is precisely sufficient to exterminate others.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 16:02:09 UTC No. 16377158
>>16377146
>/pol/tard
all 4chan is /pol/
🗑️ Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 16:05:13 UTC No. 16377164
>>16377157
>OP finally getting the DATA he requested
pic related
>>16377158
This wasn't always the case. I remember a time before 2016.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 16:15:43 UTC No. 16377175
>>16377141
>while I do have cancer, it would be upsetting to think about this so I'll pretend cancer isn't real and make cancer research illegal
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 16:25:26 UTC No. 16377185
>>16377103
Seems like grounds for a lawsuit.
>>16377118
>>16377146
>>16377155
>it's afraid
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 16:29:30 UTC No. 16377190
>>16377185
Because anyone is afraid of the average /pol/tard.
>>16377158
That wasn't always the case. There was a time before 2016.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 16:30:53 UTC No. 16377191
>>16377118
>OY VEYYYYYY
And yes, we know you are jewish
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 16:34:51 UTC No. 16377196
>>16377118
kys
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 16:36:18 UTC No. 16377200
>>16377191
>and yes, we know you're at the front of the racial IQ curve
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 16:36:22 UTC No. 16377201
>>16377191
It's a woman. When you read the stupidest opinion on internet It's always a woman
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 16:40:42 UTC No. 16377208
>>16377201
>back to your containment board
>opinion
You are literally retarded.
>>16377191
You've barely complained about trannies yet. Are you feeling ok?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 16:42:56 UTC No. 16377211
>>16377201
>>16377191
>muh jews
>muh women
>muh racial IQ
You will never get laid.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 16:51:35 UTC No. 16377224
I received some form of "ethics of science" training where I was told that I shouldn't build super mega bombs or killer robots as a scientist. But in this case, I think it's the responsibility of the media (lol as if) to handle this kind of information after the research is published.
If you have a society that is based on certain principles, and you find out that one of them is wrong, publishing this kind of data will result in chaos, but not publishing it will result in even more chaos down the line when the internal contradictions lead to catastrophic failures eventually. If you build a spaceship while assuming that 1+1=3, you will kill a bunch of people. The same goes for culture.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 17:18:40 UTC No. 16377262
>well, niggers and women are falling at math again
>iq maybe ?
>nah, it's just patriarchal white supremacy
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 17:35:50 UTC No. 16377286
>>16377103
race and iq is the heliocentrism of our age.
Cult of Passion at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 17:38:59 UTC No. 16377292
>>16377103
Dont worry, research continued under the term "Cognition" and thats foundational to IQ (before). Its correlated to "soul science" (BioPhysics based Physiological Phenomenology).
THEY STOPPED NOTHING...only themselves, nothing more...
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 18:10:23 UTC No. 16377334
>>16377211
Calling a /pol/tard an incel at this point doesn't even phase them. They have pretty much accepted that fact and just double down on their retarded "jew, nigger, tranny, women" conspiracy theories.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 18:17:31 UTC No. 16377345
>>16377334
>black iqs are a conspiracy POLTARD
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 18:18:32 UTC No. 16377347
I find it funny that a bunch of retards that claim to be the smartest race and sex are bitching that actually smart people aren't doing their bidding to create propaganda for them.
That's assuming the results would be in the favor, of course. They've already made up their minds that they are which is incredibly unscientific or unintelligent in itself but whatever.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 18:28:10 UTC No. 16377354
>>16377347
What bothers me is that ignoring reality hurts scientific progress. If we understood the relationship between genes and intelligence, then we could genetically engineer humans to be smarter, less impulsive, etc. Racism is irrelevant when you understand that we will create a species that will make all humans look like monkeys.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 18:33:58 UTC No. 16377359
>>16377354
what about creating another species constitutes progress according to you? what are you progressing towards?
Yevgeniy Pillman at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 18:35:32 UTC No. 16377362
>>16377292
You have untreated schizophrenia
Please get help
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 18:47:37 UTC No. 16377373
>>16377334
every fact lefturds don't like is a 'conspiracy theory'
🗑️ Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 18:55:10 UTC No. 16377385
>>16377359
Progress is ultimately reducible to positive conscious experiences. That’s where all value in life comes from. It is essentially a consequentialist and “hedonistic” way of thinking. But it’s true, we want to have the most preferable lives, possible. That means ensuring that we first exist at all, which is made more probable with technological advancements, making ourselves more intelligent, more powerful over our environment, etc. In the distant future we will be able to manipulate our own brains, we will be able to perfectly align ourselves with our environment and live happier, more fulfilling lives. Mother Nature is rather indifferent and doesn’t really care about “unnecessary” suffering, so it will be our task to overcome this through our conscious willingness towards positive conscious experiences. In the very end, I imagine a total understanding of science that will allow us to construct the most pleasurable conscious experiences possible, being generated all throughout the universe for eternity. That is how we justify the billions of years of suffering that have led to our existence. There is no other goal worth considering. But of course that’s very far away.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 19:02:40 UTC No. 16377395
>>16377385
What does truth have to do with positive conscious experiences? Do you call things true just to make yourself feel good? How does you feeling good have anything to do with others feeling good?
I don't know. Seems like you have no basis for your understanding and you would rather just project beliefs onto everybody.
🗑️ Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 19:04:59 UTC No. 16377398
>>16377395
Would you rather live a preferable life? Yes or no? It’s basically true by definition..
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 19:29:50 UTC No. 16377424
>>16377345
Blacks gave us Jazz, Rock, hip hop, and some great comedians and actors. Maybe you're just a racist retard that's prone to confirmation bias.
What the fuck have you contributed to society? Oh that's right, absolutely nothing.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 19:33:12 UTC No. 16377431
>>16377345
>doesn't deny being a /pol/tard
>doesn't deny being an incel
but man, you are so much better than black people.
>>16377373
I bet you're a holocaust denier too. It's funny how badly you dumb fucks want to compare IQs when you're in the double digits yourself.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 19:33:56 UTC No. 16377432
>>16377118
>>16377146
Get a knife and cut your throat right now.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 19:35:44 UTC No. 16377435
>>16377416
That meme is wrong, you have to swap asian with jew.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 19:37:08 UTC No. 16377436
>>16377103
Banned by the deep state.
Humans are not allowed to increase their IQ, instead it must be lowered by mixing their blood with beasts.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 19:39:47 UTC No. 16377438
>>16377190
>(((anyone)))
🗑️ Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 19:40:39 UTC No. 16377439
>>16377424
they also commit half the crimes. Not sure if it’s worth it. The US was dominant in the world stage even before blacks were given rights. Civilization advances through technology, not rap and basketball, especially when the cost of that entertainment is high crime rates.
🗑️ Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 19:42:40 UTC No. 16377444
>>16377437
>THERE GOES MY HERO
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 19:44:18 UTC No. 16377446
>>16377424
>Blacks gave us Jazz, Rock, hip hop,
Um, no, no, and no.
Did you ever think of actually going and checking if Blacks really were the first do create these forms of music, or do you just fall in line because Wikipedia says so?
I predict this idea is such a threat to you that you'll sperg out in response to the mere suggestion that maybe, just maybe, I can show proof that the first jazz, rock, blues, and so on songs were from Whites.
🗑️ Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 19:50:29 UTC No. 16377451
>>16377446
next you’ll tell me that a Black man didn’t invent peanut butter
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 19:53:14 UTC No. 16377453
>>16377118
/thread
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 19:53:43 UTC No. 16377454
>>16377398
you moved the goalpost to "preferable", making it a tautology
you're dishonest
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 19:55:40 UTC No. 16377457
>>16377118
>>16377141
>>16377146
>>16377155
>>16377190
>>16377208
>>16377211
>>16377334
>>16377347
>>16377424
>>16377431
go back to reddĂt, you assblasted tranny freak
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 19:57:49 UTC No. 16377462
>>16377453
Why does science hurt your feefees?
🗑️ Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 19:57:49 UTC No. 16377463
>>16377454
That’s what a “positive” conscious experience means IMO. But if you think I misspoke, then so be it. You have nothing else to disagree with than semantics at this point, unless you find something else to nitpick. But it seems we actually agree
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 19:59:35 UTC No. 16377466
>>16377463
not the same anon you were arguing with before
I just saw your goalpost-moving/equivocation while scrolling through the thread, and called it out
no need to be dishonest to make your case
🗑️ Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 20:06:01 UTC No. 16377473
>>16377466
I already explained the equivocation in the original comment >>16377385
> But it’s true, we want to have the most preferable lives, possible
So I already established that I equivocate positive experiences with preferable experiences. In my language it’s the same thing.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 20:06:30 UTC No. 16377475
>>16377398
This is meaningless. What makes a life preferable? How do you know what preferable is? How do you know preferable is the same across groups?
Get off that lean boy
🗑️ Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 20:11:41 UTC No. 16377482
>>16377475
It’s a fact recognized by everyone that an experience can be preferable. For example, you could eat your favorite food or you could eat a mixture of vomit and shit. It’s true that some creatures actually like eating shit, so obviously preferences are subjective to an extent, but the point is that preferences exist, and we will always prefer the preferable by definition. I don’t know how you could possibly argue against that. So a preferable life just refers to a preferable sum of experiences. Intuitively we understand this when we say that some people have better, happier lives than others. Even if they have different preferences, they still fulfill their preferences at a relatively higher rate.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 20:21:42 UTC No. 16377496
>>16377482
Where is this recognized by everyone? I don't remember signing up for a survey where they asked my what I preferred. There are no posted results anywhere confirming that we all agree on preferences. Your samharrisian quibbling is noted, but it is baseless. If truth is grounded in preference, then definitions themselves are grounded in it. And as such, how do you know that the definition is coming from you or someone else's preferences?
I will just ignore your use of the royal we as it needlessly complicates the matter.
>the preferable life just refers to a preferable sum of experiences
Where are these experiences added up? Is that heaven? Is that in history and legacy?
What is the arithmetic here? How is it weighted?
Who is doing the calculus?
Its like you don't even understand that you are directly refuting your premise.
🗑️ Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 20:28:17 UTC No. 16377501
>>16377496
Do you have preferences? Do you think it’s possible for one life to be more preferable than another? If I kidnapped you and tortured you every day, would this be equally preferable to any other life you could live? If not, then you admit that some lives can be more preferable than others, and this implies that a life or lives can be the most preferable overall.
If you still seem to think that I’m saying everyone has the same exact preferences, then go back and read what I said in the previous comment. But denying that we have preferences at all is retarded and it seems like you are just arguing for the sake of arguing. The understanding that we can attain more preferable experiences and sums of experiences is the whole basis of all our action. Life is meaningless otherwise.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 20:28:33 UTC No. 16377502
>>16377457
You're probably what, 12 years old?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 20:30:12 UTC No. 16377504
>>16377146
xir we are on 4chxn
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 20:31:49 UTC No. 16377508
>NOOO WHY WON'T SOMEONE PUT IN ALL THE WORK AND MONEY TO POSSIBLY GIVE ME A REASON TO SAY I'M BETTER THAN OTHER PEOPLE DESPITE BEING A RETARD INCEL NEET THAT DOES NOTHING WITH MY LIFE
>>16377446
You're retarded.
>>16377457
>>16377432
>>16377438
Same /pol/fag over and over.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 20:33:37 UTC No. 16377512
>>16377504
/pol/ and 2016 are the worst things to happen to 4chan. Now it's just filled with insufferable retards with a reddit superiority complex that just cry about jews, blacks, and trannies.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 20:35:00 UTC No. 16377513
>>16377502
don't project, predditor
>>16377508
>scared of le big bad /pol/
maybe you should've stayed on reddit, tranny freak
cope and seethe, you samefagging stupid rat
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 20:36:19 UTC No. 16377514
>>16377512
>WAAAAAAAH genetics is le mean and scary cuz it invalidates my entire retarded ideology
You reddit tourists are insufferable.
Go back to your shithole containment site, you piece of shit reddit tourist.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 20:36:41 UTC No. 16377515
>>16377501
>>16377501
Hypotheticals really aren't helping you schizo.
So should I live my life according to my preferences or according to what may happen - you kidnapping me and torturing me every day. Which one?
I don't know why you are insisting this as the point to confront you on, but you aren't leaving me much other choice as you have completely retracted from your original point. >>16377385
>Progress is ultimately reducible to positive conscious experiences
>. . .But it’s true, we want to have the most preferable lives, possible
Now you are saying I am denying preferences? Brother, meds. Stick to the point at hand.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 20:40:38 UTC No. 16377518
>>16377439
>Blacks, however, represent 26.6% of total arrests.
It depends on the crime and to be fair these crimes take place in places where none of you live and will ever witness. Most murders and violent crimes are black on black.
If you want to fix crime amongst blacks then you are going to have to drastically change black culture. IQ has very little impact on crime. You take the person out of the culture and you will end up with a perfectly intelligent person.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 20:42:22 UTC No. 16377520
>>16377146
>says the predditor bitching and whining throughout the entire thread about how genetics research is heckin scary
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 20:43:46 UTC No. 16377522
>>16377513
That's not what projecting is. You're like as if chatgpt was trained on /pol/. You just repeat the same retarded insults you're limited intelligence can come up with. The "stupid rat" thing is common among muslims, so you're just some dumb Ahmed that thinks the majority of the world hates jews.
🗑️ Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 20:45:31 UTC No. 16377523
>>16377515
> So should I live my life according to my preferences or according to what may happen - you kidnapping me and torturing me every day. Which one?
I have no idea what you are even trying to ask. My position is clear: you most likely prefer not to be under my control, being tortured every day. So it is in your interest to prevent this from happening. You DO have a preference in this case, though you refused to answer my question and admit that yes, you do have preferences and that yes, it would be more preferable not to be tortured every day, at least on average. You could argue that maybe my torturing you would lead to some overall improvement in your life in the long run, and that’s certainly possible, but that’s true for all things, but we can’t reason like that as we go through life, as we have to stick to what works on average. We all have a good idea that it’s possible to live a bad life, that we could have made better choices in our past, that some people have better lives than others, etc. This is so obvious that it’s ridiculous to argue against it. You are just arguing for the sake of arguing.
> Now you are saying I am denying preferences?
Well what are you denying, exactly? Because everything I’m saying is as true as anything can be true.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 20:46:36 UTC No. 16377526
>>16377522
yes it is, dipshit
you're projecting your immaturity
>muslim
not a mudslim, but cute (if desperate) deflection attempt
🗑️ Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 20:52:59 UTC No. 16377533
>>16377518
Both genes and environment matter. You seem quick to say that IQ doesn’t make a difference, but how do you know that? Are we not animals? Do our biological traits not determine our behavior in some way? Do you think chimps could behave like humans if only they were raised as humans? The problem with your way of thinking is that this will completely undermine any attempt to admit that our genes are flawed regardless of our race and try to improve them. Humans are not the peak of intelligent life. We have flaws and it is certainly possible that some individuals are more flawed than others, and that some populations or races on average have more flaws in certain areas, such as less intelligence or a greater predisposition towards violence and short-term thinking. This is not only true across races but also within races, as it’s obviously true that some whites are genetically determined to be less intelligent than other whites. Only a retarded leftist would deny these facts about reality. It’s true that we should try to create more positive conditions for all people, to improve their opportunities. It’s also true that genes still make a difference, and that we won’t necessarily see equality in outcomes for that reason. None of this provides the moral justification for genocide, of course. So there is nothing inherently immoral about recognizing the fact of genetic inequality in our world. It is actually by recognizing inequality that we can fix it!
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 20:57:03 UTC No. 16377539
>>16377523
You are really not good at this. Your are positing that my preferences are tied to some untenable other world where you kidnap and torture me. And that this non-existent other world proves your claims even while you aren't addressing anything related to where you started.
Not a good look.
I will reboot the conversation one more time.
What does truth have to do with positive conscious experiences? Do you call things true just to make yourself feel good? How does you feeling good have anything to do with others feeling good?
🗑️ Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 21:01:54 UTC No. 16377550
>>16377539
Why haven’t you answered my questions?
Do you have preferences?
Do you think some lives are more preferable than others?
Do you care what happens in your life?
Do you feel the inclination to guide your decisions toward a more preferable outcome?
You know the answer is yes, but if you admitted any of it, then it would be obvious that you are just talking out of your ass just to argue pointlessly.
>What does truth have to do with positive conscious experiences? Do you call things true just to make yourself feel good? How does you feeling good have anything to do with others feeling good?
1) It is true that people have preferences
2) I call things true to orient my beliefs and guide reality as I see fit. Preferences exist, therefore I want to satisfy them, and I want others to satisfy their preferences as well.
3) I assume others are like me and also have preferences. If you disagree then you admit that it doesn’t matter what happens to you, it’s all equally preferable anyway. Therefore I can torture you and you won’t even complain.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 21:05:21 UTC No. 16377557
>>16377118
Why are you so afraid lmao? If there really isn't any racial bias on iq, let the people studying that prove it once and for all?? Why scared of definitive proof?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 21:07:08 UTC No. 16377561
>>16377103
Government has already decided the results of human demographic research on intelligence.
If you based your conclusion purely on the data, then they declare you a bigot.
Because data is racist!
🗑️ Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 21:08:50 UTC No. 16377563
>>16377561
I wonder if this also applies for speciesism! We should stop believing that other animals are dumber than humans. No! It’s just a broken system
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 21:16:18 UTC No. 16377573
>>16377550
No wonder you are going through this circuitous route. You don't know logic and you don't know how to read. Shit.
1. You think it is true that people have preferences, but you might only know that about yourself. I don't think you really know that either, because you have tied preferences to truth for some strange reason. This also starts circular by declaring some axiom true - people have preferences - but then preferences decides truth.
2. This doesn't follow from anything and now you have introduced beliefs without connecting truth to preferences. The existence of a preference doesn't mean anything, nor could they necessarily be fulfilled, nor do I think you even know what a preference is. Why do you think others have preferences?
And to turn your quixotic hypothetical on you: if someone were to come and kidnap and torture you, you would prefer such an outcome? Strange. It seems like we can't make it a single post without complete contradiction.
3. You admit you assume 1, so your whole argument is circular. Luckily, you have some retarded notion explaining your reality so it is preferable to just do whatever you are going to do even when it puts you in such humiliating circumstances. Disagreeing with this point also has nothing to do with what I think about myself. The claim that a rock doesn't have preference doesn't really have any bearing on my activities and choices. And here you go talking about torture.
What a crock my guy.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 21:18:30 UTC No. 16377576
>>16377118
You're part of the problem of what's currently making the world worse.
🗑️ Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 21:19:34 UTC No. 16377580
>>16377573
> if someone were to come and kidnap and torture you, you would prefer such an outcome? Strange.
how the fuck did I imply that you absolute retard?
🗑️ Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 21:25:50 UTC No. 16377585
>>16377573
> You think it is true that people have preferences, but you might only know that about yourself
And other people might not be conscious at all. Maybe I’m the only conscious being. So what? I’m still gonna assume that other people have preferences, because if I’m wrong, then there’s no harm done, since nothing I do would violate another’s preferences as they don’t exist. And I think it’s pretty laughable that you are refusing to admit that you yourself have preferences. What even are you trying to get at here? Such a pointless disagreement. I want to make everyone in the universe have a more preferable life and you disagree with this? Fuck off.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 21:27:03 UTC No. 16377587
>>16377424
Blacks would never have even created musical instruments on their own.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 21:28:52 UTC No. 16377590
>>16377580
This is what I am talking about. You just quibble and use things without understanding implications.
>I call things true to orient my beliefs and guide reality . . . I want others to satisfy their preferences as well
> I assume others are like me
This implies that someone torturing you would be doing it for their preference and you want them to do it. This is an easy one man.
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 21:31:28 UTC No. 16377595
>>16377518
You're a science denying retard. Basically all of the scientific literature over the past 40 years has concluded that genetics actually matters far more than we thought and that it plays a much, much larger role than environment.
🗑️ Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 21:33:15 UTC No. 16377596
>>16377590
> This implies that someone torturing you would be doing it for their preference and you want them to do it. This is an easy one man.
not if that interferes with someone else’s preference. Obviously not everyone can satisfy their preferences perfectly when they are at odds with each other. I never implied that this would be possible in our current circumstances. One day we might live in a world where this is more possible, and one person’s preference might not be at the expense of another’s.
You are extremely desperate to put words in my mouth. Go waste time with someone else. I’ve written enough for the readers to see that you are retarded and out of your league here
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 21:38:13 UTC No. 16377605
>>16377596
I haven't put a single word in your mouth. And now you are talking about conflicting preferences. Yet another dimension as you reel back from your bold samharrisian delusion. Run away. I would tell you to think, but I am betting that means group therapy on ribbit. So don't think. Do anything that you aren't currently doing. Do something you would prefer not to.
Trying to pretend like I am the psycho when you were just chomping to discuss torture. Where is the schizo we deserve?
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 21:40:11 UTC No. 16377608
i can't even follow if anything relevant happened in this thread because 2 (or more?) bozos are proclaiming their love for each other with their vitriol. just shut the fuck up
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 23:37:38 UTC No. 16377710
Anonymous at Thu, 12 Sep 2024 23:46:03 UTC No. 16377718
>>16377103
>>16377118
>>16377141
If any of you deny progressing scientific research of our reality to protect subhumans who have no conscious thoughts and live to take our tax dollars, rob our stores, and make life hell on earth one more time, I will bake you in an oven.
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 02:49:35 UTC No. 16377954
>>16377103
yes.
we cant have scientists finding a way to make people more intelligent.
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 10:44:59 UTC No. 16378320
>>16377954
>we cant have scientists finding a way to make people more intelligent.
That is easy, breed with blue or green eyed people.
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 16:36:21 UTC No. 16378731
>>16377103
the answer to censorship is decentralized, open source, independent research.
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 17:11:46 UTC No. 16378797
>>16377424
Wow nigs invented some shitty degen "hip hop" bullshit that a study found baboons are attracted to lmao. kill that nigga fuck dat bitch ass nigga mufugga!
Truly a great creation that proves nogs are on par with civilization. Lmao, they can keep the rap and fuck off back home and take 60% of homicides and shitting up everywhere.
What does the average non-nig contribute? Being a net tax payer, for one.
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 17:13:46 UTC No. 16378799
>>16377508
>okay maybe they destroy everything cuz they're a bunch of 80 iq primal retards but at least they gave us chimp music bro
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 17:16:06 UTC No. 16378804
>>16377141
>saying every socioeconomic failure of blacks and hispanics is due to raycis wypipo cuz there are no inherent differences isnt incredibly destructive
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 17:32:41 UTC No. 16378845
If Jews can build nuclear weapons, I can query a database. Fuck th NIHGERS
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 17:42:08 UTC No. 16378863
Wouldn't it be racist to fear such a thing in the first place? In fact it would be even more racist now when the fear is not based on actual studies but solely on racist stereotypes. Why would you have the fear towards the study otherwise?
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 18:42:16 UTC No. 16378961
Link to race and IQ is racism. The less IQ is measured, the more racism is experienced. Africans would travel in stars if the whites did not oppress
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 19:47:50 UTC No. 16379052
>>16377144
Basically. Science does not care about your feelings, but the current insane left political movement is based on control of those feelings. Real science eliminates their world view which is why stuff like in OP must be censored.
The SJW mindset dies without censorship, but this of course is not how science is to be done. This is how you know for a scientific fact that there are people doing everything they can to control the population of the world for their own benefit.
This is a scientific fact and there's nothing argue about.
The good news is that you can very easily control and manipulate the people of this leftist ideology because once you understand their programming, you can exploit them as well just like the people at the top. I am very successful because of this.
For example, I am going to give all SJWs in this thread a direct order. Go and buy products that you don't need. You will because I have ensured there is a rainbow sticker on it. Now give me your money because of this. You will do it every time and if you don't various guilt emotions will be activated.
See how easy it is anons?
Anonymous at Fri, 13 Sep 2024 22:41:54 UTC No. 16379255
>>16378961
>Africans would travel in stars if the whites did not oppress
Ummm... past experience does NOT back-up your statement.
Anonymous at Sat, 14 Sep 2024 11:31:35 UTC No. 16379835
>>16377211
Not when I have my way with you pretty boy.
Anonymous at Sat, 14 Sep 2024 11:35:52 UTC No. 16379839
>>16377103
IQ is too murky, the researxh should be tied to something more objective like idk, whats a proxy for intelligence? Brain volume?
Anonymous at Sat, 14 Sep 2024 12:26:37 UTC No. 16379913
>>16377103
Modern day luddites
Anonymous at Sat, 14 Sep 2024 12:33:01 UTC No. 16379922
>>16377334
I systematically disregard people calling others "incels" online, it ironically has the opposite effect on the discourse that you hoped it would.
🗑️ bodhi at Sat, 14 Sep 2024 12:43:30 UTC No. 16379929
>>16377334
what "conspiracy theories?" people who call observed realities "conspiracy theories" are generally either idiots or glowing. Be specific about what you are calling a "conspiracy theory"
Anonymous at Sat, 14 Sep 2024 12:52:24 UTC No. 16379936
>>16379929
It's over in 10 minutes. There'll be no forgiveness bar those who deserve. Rest assured. I'll be with my team also soon.
Anonymous at Sat, 14 Sep 2024 22:14:33 UTC No. 16380794
>>16377437
Sure. And I suspect the "sentence" was in reality three years working in a military lab.
Anonymous at Sat, 14 Sep 2024 22:18:03 UTC No. 16380799
>>16378961
>Africans would travel in stars if the whites did not oppress
When people claim this, I remind them that Africans existed for hundreds of thousands of years before Europeans even existed.
So what is holding them back from the stars?
Anonymous at Sat, 14 Sep 2024 22:27:58 UTC No. 16380814
>>16377103
Race doesn't have biological meaning. How would you define a "white" race? A retarded Turk or swarthy Italian can be "white" if they have a skin color?
Let's say you *prove* there's a genetic link between "race" and IQ, what are you going to do then? America and pretty much every developed world is a multi-racial country. Try going out on the streets and shout bunch of racist or bigoted shit, you'd get punched in the face. Try doing that at your work place, you'd get fired and can never be able to find another job.
Lot of these whites talking 24/7 about "muh race and IQ" are themselves low IQ retards who have double digit IQ. Intelligence and IQ are INDIVIDUAL matric. Just because you belong to one race vs. other doesn't automatically make you less or more intelligent. Your life is your life.
Anonymous at Sat, 14 Sep 2024 22:45:46 UTC No. 16380846
>>16380814
>Let's say you *prove* there's a
Do you know anything at all about the scientific method? Anything?
🗑️ Anonymous at Mon, 16 Sep 2024 04:04:56 UTC No. 16382647
Yes, chud.
Anonymous at Mon, 16 Sep 2024 11:35:38 UTC No. 16382975
>>16380814
>matric
brown
Anonymous at Mon, 16 Sep 2024 12:00:42 UTC No. 16383028
>>16377155
>spend your own money
We did, it’s called taxes
Anonymous at Mon, 16 Sep 2024 12:10:01 UTC No. 16383034
>>16377103
You can research IQ and genetic ancestry correlated persons, because race ain’t real. You get an AI to group people based on their gene traits and don’t assign them a race name. Then test IQ. You’d rename them group A, group B. Etc
Then it’s not racist.
Of course you can adjust for socioeconomic conditions to please those peoples.
Even better than IQ is like a brain scan because then you don’t have to ask questions only whites would know like complex patterns like box circle square.
Anonymous at Mon, 16 Sep 2024 12:11:06 UTC No. 16383036
>>16383028
If you go near the I.M crime you can be spun into maximum crime, you are ordered to never use it. Thus, always be lawful here and don't even consider it. They were spun.
Following my today's sign, I think I'll be doing soon
Anonymous at Mon, 16 Sep 2024 12:12:19 UTC No. 16383039
>>16383036
No tactics at all, not even a fake, not even a re-order. Nothing. Final
Anonymous at Mon, 16 Sep 2024 12:23:04 UTC No. 16383044
>>16377224
I don’t think your analogy makes any sense, probably at all.
Anonymous at Mon, 16 Sep 2024 12:58:53 UTC No. 16383074
>>16377424
fucking kek, (you)
Anonymous at Mon, 16 Sep 2024 14:04:21 UTC No. 16383157
Does anybody got even partial of it on torrent? I don't know why you talk bullshit here, point is to get it have backed up.
Anonymous at Mon, 16 Sep 2024 14:07:58 UTC No. 16383164
>>16377512
/pol/ is over 70% Israel IPs, though, quit with the antisemitism, chud!
raphael at Mon, 16 Sep 2024 15:19:09 UTC No. 16383270
>>16383164
they publish that data?
raphael at Mon, 16 Sep 2024 15:39:43 UTC No. 16383304
>>16383034
thats just being politically correct
i thought race was just skin color and features
Anonymous at Mon, 16 Sep 2024 19:29:24 UTC No. 16383710
>>16377502
worse. his mental abilities have stopped at that age.
Anonymous at Mon, 16 Sep 2024 20:02:12 UTC No. 16383746
>>16377103
i sinced believe now i realized its a emotion who makes you lesser pain as since... hf