🗑️ 🧵 Untitled Thread
Anonymous at Sat, 14 Sep 2024 12:39:00 UTC No. 16379925
can you refute that the twin towers were nuked using science?
https://nitter.poast.org/cirnosad/s
Anonymous at Sat, 14 Sep 2024 12:52:52 UTC No. 16379937
>>16379925
Thread 2
https://nitter.poast.org/cirnosad/s
Anonymous at Sat, 14 Sep 2024 14:31:54 UTC No. 16380000
>>16379925
>>16379937
I don't see much there that can't be explained by large amounts of some other type of explosive, rather than micro-nukes
🗑️ Anonymous at Sat, 14 Sep 2024 19:38:33 UTC No. 16380531
>>16379925
Oy vey, that is antisemitic!
Anonymous at Sun, 15 Sep 2024 17:33:10 UTC No. 16382110
>>16379925
Can't you retards just spend 5 mins studying the behaviour of steel structures during long lasting fires instead of wasting years of your life coming up with shoe size IQ theories about micro nukes?
Anonymous at Sun, 15 Sep 2024 21:22:00 UTC No. 16382308
>>16380000
Molten steel being present at Ground Zero (itself a military term for the site of a nuclear detonation) for six months after the event (according to sources) and up to 3 years after the event (according to other sources now scrubbed from the internet).
Anonymous at Mon, 16 Sep 2024 20:44:40 UTC No. 16383794
>>16382308
>Retard doesn't understand heat transfer