Anonymous at Sat, 14 Sep 2024 23:58:44 UTC No. 16380938

>>16380927
No, I don't think so, the instinct for self preserevation of those closest to ourselves is clearly the most evolutionarilty selected for.

what does the gender break down look like, does it include those with children?

Anonymous at Sun, 15 Sep 2024 00:07:30 UTC No. 16380944

>>16380927
>openly demonstrates narcissism and superiority complex after seeking out confirmation bias
You know tests like this are purely subjective and if someone is simply virtue signaling for appearance purposes then it would render it completely meaningless, right?

It's funny how people like yourself can't even fathom that there are no "sides" and there's only the illusion of freedom and choice.
Not to mention how your views are a byproduct of your consumerism habits and not something that you arrived at organically, rather picking whatever is socially popular and helps people feel like they fit in with the perceived majority.
Pure midwit behavior that lacks any sort of critical thinking.
There's a reason the aphorism "Know thyself" was such a vital part of coming of age in ancient times so people wouldn't be taken advantage of by bad actors looking to exploit them, which is completely lost these days,

Anonymous at Sun, 15 Sep 2024 02:27:50 UTC No. 16381131

>>16380944
forgot to add, none of this applies to me of course

Anonymous at Sun, 15 Sep 2024 02:49:14 UTC No. 16381154

>>16381131
When all else fails, just LARP as someone else because you can't think of anything to say.
I'm more than aware of my own shortcomings and work hard to overcome them. I also don't need to base my value off a group identity.
Points still stand.

Anonymous at Sun, 15 Sep 2024 02:57:08 UTC No. 16381160

>>16381154
so you DO have the freedom and choice to overcome your own shortcomings? or it would have happened anyway?

🗑️ Anonymous at Sun, 15 Sep 2024 02:59:33 UTC No. 16381163

>>16381154
>I also don't need to base my value off a group identity!!!
>I'm a super special unique snowflake!!!

Anonymous at Sun, 15 Sep 2024 03:36:23 UTC No. 16381214

>>16381160
Context matters. Learn to read.
>>16381163
Boring. Go vent your insecurity elsewhere, goof.
Sorry you got mad over the truth.

Anonymous at Sun, 15 Sep 2024 03:51:26 UTC No. 16381235

>>16381214
see >>16380944

Anonymous at Sun, 15 Sep 2024 03:53:33 UTC No. 16381238

>>16381235
Not how that works, newfag. Embarrassing....
Sorry you got mad over the truth.

Anonymous at Sun, 15 Sep 2024 03:59:05 UTC No. 16381246

>>16380927
I can feel how much more moral and virtuous you are from here and in the rest of the thread.

So above it all and caring! Truly the arbiters of good. Unless someone disagrees or offers a different view then it's billions in property damage and cities burnt down.

Obviously in the most compassionate and moral ways.

Anonymous at Sun, 15 Sep 2024 04:40:44 UTC No. 16381285

>>16381214
>>16381238
posts like this truly demonstrate what an original freethinker you are

Anonymous at Sun, 15 Sep 2024 05:10:58 UTC No. 16381310

>>16381246
Anon, the conservatives are on the left of the image.

Also I’m pretty sure it’s fake and gay.

Anonymous at Sun, 15 Sep 2024 05:13:20 UTC No. 16381312

>>16381310
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-019-12227-0

Anonymous at Sun, 15 Sep 2024 05:23:56 UTC No. 16381324

>>16381312
>look, this nature paper makes it less fake and gay
Anyways, better hope this isn’t true regardless.

Anonymous at Sun, 15 Sep 2024 05:25:17 UTC No. 16381326

>>16381324
>>16381312
Forgot my image

Anonymous at Sun, 15 Sep 2024 05:45:49 UTC No. 16381338

>>16381324
>>16381326
what?

Anonymous at Sun, 15 Sep 2024 05:48:16 UTC No. 16381340

>>16381285
Only you seem consistently concerned with appearances as you continually obsess over it. As I said, I'm not interested in your insecurities.

Anonymous at Sun, 15 Sep 2024 05:51:12 UTC No. 16381342

>>16381340
see >>16380944

Anonymous at Sun, 15 Sep 2024 05:52:44 UTC No. 16381343

>>16381338
My brain doesn’t have the defective part that yours has that says “nature article = true”

Anonymous at Sun, 15 Sep 2024 05:55:40 UTC No. 16381344

>>16381342
Still not how that works. Try again, newfag.
Sorry you got butthurt over the truth.
While the problem is exponentially worse for people who lean left, it doesn't change that too many on the right fall into the same trap.

Anonymous at Sun, 15 Sep 2024 05:57:47 UTC No. 16381347

>>16381344
>one number is exponentially bigger than another number
/sci/let detected

Anonymous at Sun, 15 Sep 2024 05:58:48 UTC No. 16381349

>>16381343
Do you believe anything you read anywhere, or do you base all your knowledge on your direct personal experience? If the latter, ngl that's pretty based

Anonymous at Sun, 15 Sep 2024 06:28:14 UTC No. 16381378

>>16381347
Get a hobby, man. You sound retarded. There's healthier ways to get attention then acting like a fag online.

Anonymous at Sun, 15 Sep 2024 06:50:01 UTC No. 16381415

>>16381378
Like what?

Anonymous at Sun, 15 Sep 2024 07:08:34 UTC No. 16381433

>>16381415
Try meditation or going to the gym.

Anonymous at Mon, 16 Sep 2024 03:00:03 UTC No. 16382611

which of the two groups thinks both of these pelvises potentially are male?

Anonymous at Mon, 16 Sep 2024 03:16:32 UTC No. 16382624

>>16380927
why did they plot this shit on a circle
if it's a 1-16 meme scale, just post the fucking histograms like wtf is this shit, who are they trying to impress? Who in their right mind would think this is a good figure? This isn't a heatmap, it's not mapping anything 2d, it's a fucking violin plot masquerading as a red blob in circles.

Anonymous at Mon, 16 Sep 2024 03:33:10 UTC No. 16382632

>>16382624
holy fucking shit these figures are UGLY
the fucking data points are the center weight of what they drew on the fucking sheet, they didn't even take a distance calculation from the center point.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-019-12227-0
I want to personally meet this mf who designed this piece of shit question and got into Nature

Anonymous at Mon, 16 Sep 2024 04:36:32 UTC No. 16382673

>>16382632
>>16382624
>being this triggered
clearly the contents of the data set upset you

Anonymous at Mon, 16 Sep 2024 05:12:34 UTC No. 16382705

>>16382673
no, it's the fucking image, the dataset is a fucking x/y heatmap for a 16 point scale
I'm halfway reverse-engineering this shit to a 16 point scale again for a seaborne histogram
Their point that the mean for lib/con is clearer with a fucking default box and whisker and whatever fucking graphs they tried in 3b to justify this POS heatmap.
All the data these guys got from the mechanical turk (hello sarr) survey 3a is an x.y position of where they clicked on and a 1-7 bins of lib/moderate/conservative. Instead of doing anything meaningful, like the distance from center, or asking for a choice between 1-16, they made a shitty heatmap and let you go with the conclusions.

Adam Waytz has centered his entire thesis around empathy in society, and he can't even produce a graph that represents that relationship of empathy and ideology. These stats are a fucking joke.
I'm not trusting a graph made up of the political opinions of Indian sockpuppets calculated with an idiot at the helm. His other paper graphs are garbage too, so it's on adam's head.

Anonymous at Mon, 16 Sep 2024 05:23:27 UTC No. 16382710

The amount of /pol/tards on this board is astounding. Do you faggots realize you're a joke to the rest of the internet? When people think of incels, they instantly associate it with /pol/fags.

Anonymous at Mon, 16 Sep 2024 05:26:55 UTC No. 16382712

>>16382710
My only guess is that they think science and clinical studies validate their opinions but they read shit completely out of context, from idiotic right wing click bait sites, or they have no idea how to interpret the data so they just come across as conspiracy theoriat retards.

Anonymous at Mon, 16 Sep 2024 11:06:14 UTC No. 16382912

>>16380927
why do they all point at 2 o clock? couldn't this have been mapped in a 1-D line?

Anonymous at Mon, 16 Sep 2024 11:08:17 UTC No. 16382914

>>16382632
>liberal
>picks high number
>dehumanizes others

Anonymous at Mon, 16 Sep 2024 11:08:42 UTC No. 16382915

>>16382912
It's ready.

Anonymous at Mon, 16 Sep 2024 14:13:05 UTC No. 16383173

I don't like or trust this study. It makes liberals look stupid, when we all know conservatives are the stupid ones

Garrote at Mon, 16 Sep 2024 14:53:43 UTC No. 16383233

>>16383173
Liberals are just trend chasers.

🗑️ Anonymous at Tue, 17 Sep 2024 02:50:23 UTC No. 16384111

>>16383233
Who is it that creates the trends knowing that there will be a group to follow them?

Garrote at Tue, 17 Sep 2024 13:22:15 UTC No. 16384621

>>16384111
The liberals' masters AKA the kikes.

Anonymous at Tue, 17 Sep 2024 19:56:51 UTC No. 16385021

>>16382710
>>16382712
Nothing says you care about other people like importing cheap labour, displacing already marginalized classes and if they dare to speak about it bring more cheap labour, not mention that it's obvious that liberal absolute only care about browns as long they stay as slave calss and flood white voters

Anonymous at Tue, 17 Sep 2024 20:09:04 UTC No. 16385033

Anonymous at Wed, 18 Sep 2024 00:00:49 UTC No. 16385390

>>16385033
the feminism stuff is expected but the "bemoans the non-inclusion of astrology and spirituality" stuff actually pisses me off