Image not available

709x1016

FirePotion.jpg

๐Ÿงต Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16382458

Let's say I have a number line which solves for x.
I solve an equation and I get a complex solution.
So now I can make an imaginary plane and I can solve my equation in terms of x and i.
Since i is just another dimension could I not just say that the numbers in terms of i are just the y coordinates in a Cartesian system?
For example couldn't 4x+5i become (4,5)?

Anonymous No. 16382466

Yes, but not in a conventional way. Define your system to not have a y and just use i instead.

Anonymous No. 16382471

>>16382466

But it can be seen as interchangeable. If I have complex solutions I need another plane, and I can arbitrarily designate that plane as a dimension.

Anonymous No. 16383795

>>16382471
The complex numbers have an algebraic structure imposed on them that cartesian coordinates do not.

Anonymous No. 16383946

>>16383795
Yeah, but if both forms are valid, i may be either algebraic or dimensional. If i has a dimensional interpretation, that could lead to new ideas in math and physics.

Anonymous No. 16383948

>>16383946

Like Poincare defined time as an i dimension.