Anonymous at Mon, 16 Sep 2024 06:13:28 UTC No. 16382731

Too blurry. Is impossible to say if it was really americans or actually Mexicans that went there in flying saucers to fake the landings for propaganda purposes.

Anonymous at Mon, 16 Sep 2024 06:15:59 UTC No. 16382732

>>16382731
you make a solid 2 beers at midnight point there, I cannot deny.

Anonymous at Mon, 16 Sep 2024 10:32:54 UTC No. 16382885

It's weird to me that people are so adamant about being "not deniers", like simply entertaining the possibility and wondering how plausible it would be means someone is completely off the pale. The actual evidence that people walked in the Moon (as opposed to robots being sent there by rockets alone) is so limited that it's kind of reasonable to ponder and question these things. After all, it's a single historical sequence of events that was barely documented hasn't since been replicated, despite being claimed to be mankind's most defining achievement.

Anonymous at Mon, 16 Sep 2024 10:34:12 UTC No. 16382886

>>16382885
Cigar

Anonymous at Mon, 16 Sep 2024 10:36:56 UTC No. 16382890

>>16382730
You're probably looking at some wind erosion. It's impossible to tell because we've never been able to go there to find out if it has an atmosphere or not.

Anonymous at Mon, 16 Sep 2024 11:01:51 UTC No. 16382908

>>16382890
Mouf, now. Don't mess me about, just do it.

Now.

Anonymous at Mon, 16 Sep 2024 13:47:55 UTC No. 16383131

>>16382885
It was replicated on 12, 14, 15, etc

Anonymous at Mon, 16 Sep 2024 14:29:45 UTC No. 16383200

>>16382730
More than 12'000 years ago true humans (0% chimp genes) went to the Moon and left those marks of activity there. The Moon landings were faked to hide that fact, to provide an explanation for such a thing. Notice how Apollo 13 was the one that failed because mUh bAd nUmBer. Anyone with a working brain knows the landings shown in TV were 100% fake.

Anonymous at Mon, 16 Sep 2024 15:38:13 UTC No. 16383302

>>16382730
Unless your telescope is tens of meters in aperture, and you're observing above the moisture layer of the atmosphere, good luck having the resolution to make out the lunar orbiter images you posted.
I work with an Apollo era engineer, he's one of the most brilliant engineers I've met.

Anonymous at Mon, 16 Sep 2024 15:52:26 UTC No. 16383333

>>16382730
>this black dot at max zoom and lighting definite proof
lmfao. They could actually have staged those before the launch.

Anonymous at Mon, 16 Sep 2024 15:59:43 UTC No. 16383354

>>16383333
omg, quads of truth

Anonymous at Mon, 16 Sep 2024 16:20:27 UTC No. 16383392

>>16382730
Telescope general?
How do I get or DIY one for cheap?

Anonymous at Mon, 16 Sep 2024 16:24:55 UTC No. 16383405

>>16383392
Unironically? Buy a GSO 6 inch mirror and secondary set. For most cases, I'd go with f/6 to f/8. You'll also need a mirror cell, they can usually be bought from the same place you bought the mirror. Then go the dobsonian route and sonotube and plywood mount that bitch together. If anything you'd want to spend the big bucks on the focusing hardware and get a good eye piece. 25ish mm will do.

Facebook marketplace/your local astronomy club is another great place to find cheap telescopes.

Anonymous at Mon, 16 Sep 2024 16:26:00 UTC No. 16383408

>>16383354
I used to believe in digits, but now I think that is how they follow targets.

Anonymous at Mon, 16 Sep 2024 19:29:22 UTC No. 16383708

>>16383405
I don't know shit about telescopes and I don't remember anything about optics. Guess it's time to grab the physics books again...