Anonymous at Mon, 16 Sep 2024 16:13:51 UTC No. 16383383

>>16383377
or, because someone's going to be an autistic pedant or willfully misunderstand, that's 8th percentile smart.

Anonymous at Mon, 16 Sep 2024 16:19:42 UTC No. 16383390

>>16383377
Another reason not to get too old, after 60 start making arrangements.

Anonymous at Mon, 16 Sep 2024 16:27:16 UTC No. 16383409

>>16383377
>This is why granma can't work a cell phone.
In 70 years you won't be able to use new technology either.
And just like you watched your grandma use a typewriter, your grandchildren will watch you use a keyboard.
I have no idea how kids these days can type so fast on their fucking phones. And it'll only get worse with time.

🗑️ Anonymous at Mon, 16 Sep 2024 16:34:00 UTC No. 16383426

>>16383377
The median IQ globally is like 80 because the third world exists

Anonymous at Mon, 16 Sep 2024 16:36:42 UTC No. 16383431

>>16383377
Nothin you can do, huh. It's not even use it or lose it. It's just lose it. Life is awful, huh?

Anonymous at Mon, 16 Sep 2024 16:37:55 UTC No. 16383433

>>16383431
I like how the only thing science can do is tell you how fucked you are

Anonymous at Mon, 16 Sep 2024 16:45:20 UTC No. 16383445

>>16383377
Brutal

Anonymous at Mon, 16 Sep 2024 17:05:37 UTC No. 16383487

>>16383377
isn't IQ supposed to be age-standardized though?

Anonymous at Mon, 16 Sep 2024 17:06:16 UTC No. 16383490

>>16383487
Aren't faggots supposed to post on AT.com

Anonymous at Mon, 16 Sep 2024 17:06:38 UTC No. 16383492

>>16383409
direct brain-computer interfaces surely

Anonymous at Mon, 16 Sep 2024 17:16:56 UTC No. 16383504

>>16383409
In 70 years people will be lucky to have running water let alone advanced technology.

🗑️ Anonymous at Mon, 16 Sep 2024 18:28:01 UTC No. 16383619

Trump is 78.
If elected he'll be 82 when his term is up. He may choose to extend his term beyond this.

🗑️ Anonymous at Mon, 16 Sep 2024 18:28:41 UTC No. 16383621

>>16383619
It should be illegal for anyone over the age of 50 to be president

Anonymous at Mon, 16 Sep 2024 18:32:06 UTC No. 16383631

>>16383409
>In 70 years you won't be able to use new technology either.
Yeah. Because I'll be literally retarded too just like you.
Stop pretending like with age comes wisdom and it's somehow the kids who are wrong and are magically born proficient with new things, room temp geezer.

>>16383487
There's two versions of the test. One that does, and one that gives an objective score so you can do thing like measure things like cognitive decline over age, so you know how to normalize the first one.

🗑️ Anonymous at Mon, 16 Sep 2024 18:33:41 UTC No. 16383635

>>16383619
>He may choose to extend his term beyond this.
If he does so he'll be doing so unconstitutionally. But that doesn't really matter to his supporters anyway, they cherrypick what parts of it they actually care about so fair enough I guess.

Though it's also not like he's the only septuagenarian or older in congress. We're chock full of em.

Anonymous at Mon, 16 Sep 2024 18:34:16 UTC No. 16383636

Why do people respect university professors when they're all retarded with age

🗑️ Anonymous at Mon, 16 Sep 2024 18:39:11 UTC No. 16383643

>>16383426
Fogeys that started at a 100 in their prime are about on par with the average prison inmate or non-subsaharan developing nation citizen, yeah.

Anonymous at Mon, 16 Sep 2024 18:41:28 UTC No. 16383647

>>16383643
So I could have lived in Zambia and seemed normal this whole time

Anonymous at Mon, 16 Sep 2024 18:46:38 UTC No. 16383653

I wonder what the mode is
Because I wonder how much of it is dragged down by dudes having minor strokes and heart attacks and turning tarded

Anonymous at Mon, 16 Sep 2024 19:01:52 UTC No. 16383676

>>16383636
Tenure.

>>16383647
And a more average person, between the huge intelligence jump and the $0.04 to ZMW 1.00 exchange rate, could go there and live like a business tycoon genius. Full on Idiocracy tier.

They're crazy superstitious too, so you could just go over and scam them even if you didn't have seed money.

Anonymous at Mon, 16 Sep 2024 19:39:58 UTC No. 16383723

>>16383377
85-70 is technically only BORDERLINE retarded.

That said, it is still so low that the US Military, despite being starved for warm bodies with a pulse, refuses to recruit you on the grounds that you will reliably cause more problems than you will fix; You're a detriment to any job they could offer you, even just pushing a broom or being handed a gun and told "this side towards the enemy, charge and fire until one of you is dead," logistically worse than just leaving the position vacant.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=caR69G6wpwU

So, certainly still retarded in the vernacular use of the term.

Anonymous at Mon, 16 Sep 2024 20:08:47 UTC No. 16383759

>>16383631
>Stop pretending like with age comes wisdom
And apparently with faggotry also doesn't come literacy.
You learn shit when you're young. Technology just develops so fast now that the people for whom it might as well be alien technology hadn't had the chance to die off.
Being able to push buttons on a screen doesn't make you intelligent.

raphael at Mon, 16 Sep 2024 20:13:37 UTC No. 16383763

>>16383377
why is this new to you

my highschool senior english teacher was in her 70s and could barely work a computer or recall vocab from memory

fucking retard

Anonymous at Mon, 16 Sep 2024 20:19:25 UTC No. 16383770

>>16383759
>Being able to push buttons on a screen doesn't make you intelligent
No, but not being able to do it even after 10 years of daily exposure does make you supremely stupid, and long overdue for a pine box dirt baptism.

Anonymous at Mon, 16 Sep 2024 23:02:50 UTC No. 16383914

>>16383409
>In 70 years you won't be able to use new technology either.
In 70 years OP will be old and therefore retarded.

Anonymous at Mon, 16 Sep 2024 23:20:16 UTC No. 16383931

>>16383377
garbage data, averaging together alzheimers patients with the mentally sound is disingenuous

Anonymous at Tue, 17 Sep 2024 02:40:27 UTC No. 16384104

>>16383723
>IQ of 25
How?
Doesn't it lose any significane that low?
I mean, a fucking gorilla should be smarter than that.

Anonymous at Tue, 17 Sep 2024 14:31:14 UTC No. 16384678

>>16383931
>For example, in 2022, 1.7% of adults aged 65–74 had a dementia diagnosis, compared to 13.1% of those aged 85 and older

Enough to be dropping the score, I admit, but not THAT much that fast.

That said, knowing that about 1 in 7 people over 85 have the memory of a goldfish doesn't help the point that they're not just physically but heavily mentally compromised and shouldn't be trusted with any form of responsibility, much less somebody the highest offices in the land, and really only exist as a societal burden.

Anonymous at Tue, 17 Sep 2024 14:40:20 UTC No. 16384680

>>16383377
This is stupid.
We know that the average IQ was increasing for decades until recently. So of course we expect younger people to be smarter on average. How do you distinguish this from age causing decline?
Then after age 65 or so you're going to be combining scores for people who have suffered head injuries, or who have illnesses or things like Alzheimers with normal people.
What they should have done is compare the same people over time and average the decline.

Anonymous at Tue, 17 Sep 2024 16:35:51 UTC No. 16384807

>>16384104
>Doesn't it lose any significane that low?
Technically, IQ tests are structured in such a way, or should be, so that the answer of actually correct answer is corrected by the number of correct answers that you would have randomly guessed.

Anonymous at Wed, 18 Sep 2024 04:01:45 UTC No. 16385641

>>16383377
by medical definition, retarded
Isn't the medical definition age standardized?

Also Gc still remains pretty strong into old age so this type of "retarded" is clearly different from real retarded.
I propose we call this special "retarded" you have highlighted something different.
Perhaps "old" would be a better word.
It all makes sense that way
>She's literally old. Not exaggerating, not using the term metaphorically or flippantly, literally, by medical definition, old.
>92nd percentile old even, not just a little bit.

Anonymous at Wed, 18 Sep 2024 05:05:16 UTC No. 16385703

>>16383377
IQ measures you ability to problem solve. Neuroplasticity decreases with age. This is an obvious.

Anonymous at Wed, 18 Sep 2024 05:16:56 UTC No. 16385715

>>16383377
Are you just discovering what senility is? As your body ages, the brain too. One can compensate with wisdom and experience, but given enough time senility wins

Anonymous at Wed, 18 Sep 2024 06:05:58 UTC No. 16385750

>>16383377
there's also the fact that people have been through so much by the time they're 70 or so that they know what's important and what's not, and maybe generally don't give a fuck about iPhone's new features or whatever and would rather just deal with more meaningful shit

Anonymous at Wed, 18 Sep 2024 13:25:06 UTC No. 16385995

>>16384104
25 is around the score that toddlers and chimps get if administered the test, so almost.

Anonymous at Wed, 18 Sep 2024 13:27:04 UTC No. 16385997

>>16385641
>Gc still remains pretty strong into old age
No it doesn't. Reread the image.

Anonymous at Wed, 18 Sep 2024 13:30:11 UTC No. 16386001

>>16385750
I had a couple in two days ago that were struggling to buy stools, because the concept of "some of these are bar height (30") some of these are counter height (26") based on the description of your kitchen you need counter height" was just completely beyond their ability to grasp. They stayed in the store talking in circles for nearly two hours.

That's what spurred me to look this up in the first place.

Anonymous at Wed, 18 Sep 2024 14:03:51 UTC No. 16386024

>>16383377
my grandma using new tech with easy. phones and PCs.
It's just your family is a low IQ nogs that need to be removed.

Anonymous at Wed, 18 Sep 2024 14:04:52 UTC No. 16386027

>>16385715
>Bread eater aging

Anonymous at Wed, 18 Sep 2024 22:53:46 UTC No. 16386847

>>16385995
If I remember right, Koko the gorilla was claimed to have an IQ score around the 80s.
They performed a bunch of infant intelligence tests on her.

Anonymous at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 15:25:09 UTC No. 16387830

>>16386847
80 for an infant is markedly different from 80 for adult bud.
there's a reason there's two different tests.