Image not available

969x821

bab4bb1c50a575e38....png

๐Ÿงต Untitled Thread

Anonymous No. 16416117

Where is he? Where are the discussions with him? I can't find anything

Image not available

720x1019

owr.jpg

Anonymous No. 16416128

>>16416117
LOL, those are some mighty suspicious credentials his claim is based upon.

Anonymous No. 16416132

>>16416117
has he ever said anything interesting that a 140iq haver hasn't already thought of/said?

Anonymous No. 16416167

>>16416117
I did the math one time, if IQ works like I think it does, with a population of 8 billion an IQ above 175 (5 std dev) is meaningless

Anonymous No. 16416172

>>16416167
i was just about to ask this. would you happen to have written down what IQ would uniquely identify a person (eg 174.9193598172, 52.0124124901) for a given population (eg 8.01 B)

Anonymous No. 16416189

>>16416172
you mean the possible IQ?

Anonymous No. 16416191

>>16416189
highest possible*

Anonymous No. 16416197

>>16416172
what does this question even mean? Iq is a probability distribution not a census

Anonymous No. 16416376

His IQ score isn't based on any recognized psychometric exam. It's based on speed reading and memory tricks using a scale made up with no scientific backing to it. He's probably a very intelligent person but claiming a 276 IQ is like claiming to be a bajillionaire.

Anonymous No. 16416665

>>16416117
>the globalists
lmao china has genetically engineered super changs and amerilards are still arguing over which jew candidate to suck off

Anonymous No. 16416718

>>16416197
say the population is 2. i measure one IQ at 110. The other is therefore 90. say the population is 3. I measure two IQs, 66 and 100. The other must be 134.
Say the population is 8 billion. I measure 8 billion IQs which form a normal distibution centered around 100. There are two uniquely identifiying outliers, the max and the min.
Obviously in the real world we have imperfect testing, different tests, not enough data, but the horses are spherical and frictionless on this board.

Anonymous No. 16416749

>>16416128
Did he ever take an actual iq test?

Anonymous No. 16416755

>>16416117
this reads like a restaurant sign that says "#1 Best Ramen (Sale!)"

Anonymous No. 16416788

>>16416117
Don't IQ tests max out at 166?

Image not available

2000x2000

1723391491953027.jpg

Anonymous No. 16416793

>>16416117
>276
>>16416167
This

Anonymous No. 16418182

>>16416128
>>16416117
never ever trust a korean, they are born scammers

Anonymous No. 16418215

>>16416117
what are his thoughts on the CTMU

Anonymous No. 16418349

>>16416117
What is he doing to advance humanity?

Anonymous No. 16418618

>>16416117
South Korea has never won a Nobel Prize in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics.

Anonymous No. 16418886

Looks like a lesbian tho lmao